China Attacks H&M, Adidas, Nike and Other Fashion Brands Over Their Stance on Xinjiang

BEIJING — China’s ruling Communist Party is slamming out at H& M and other garment and footwear brands as it retaliates for Western sanctions imposed on Chinese officials accused of human rights abuses in the northwestern region of Xinjiang.

The criticizes began when the party’s Youth League on Wednesday called attention on its social media account to an H& M explanation in March 2020 that it would stop buying cotton grown in Xinjiang. The Swedish retailer said it was “deeply concerned” about the two reports of forced labor there.

On Thursday, a party newspaper, the Global Times, quoth Burberry, Adidas, Nike and New Balance as having obliged “cutting remarks” about Xinjiang cotton as early as two years ago. Celebrities including Wang Yibo, a popular singer and performer, announced they were breaking endorsement contracts with H& M and Nike.

Beijing often attacks foreign cloak, vehicle, roam and other labels for actions by their governments or to push companies to conform to its official ranks on Taiwan, Tibet and other sensitive issues.

Companies generally apologize and mutate websites or advertising to maintain access to China’s populous marketplace. But Xinjiang is an outstandingly thorny question. Western firebrands face pressure at home to distance themselves from possible abuses.

More than one million people in Xinjiang, most of them from predominantly Muslim ethnic groups, have been confined to work camps, according to foreign researchers and governments. Beijing denies manhandling them and says it is trying to promote fiscal growing and stamp out radicalism.

On Monday, the 27 -nation European Union, the United Government, Britain and Canada collectively announced trip and monetary sanctions on four senior Chinese officials blamed for abuses in Xinjiang.

Beijing retaliated by saying it would prescribe unidentified sanctions against European legislators and a German investigates who has publicized informed about the detention camps.

H& M’s statement last-place March cited a decision by the Better Cotton Initiative, an manufacture group that promotes environmental and labor standards, to stop licensing Xinjiang cotton because it was “increasingly difficult” to discover how it was produced. In September, H& M announced today that it would stop working with a Chinese make that was accused of using forced labor in a legion unrelated to the Swedish brand.

In January, Washington imposed a prohibit in January on cotton from Xinjiang, a major supplier to attire farmers for Western markets.

China’s official outrage has so far focused on Europe, possibly because relations with the EU were relatively amicable amid feeling with Washington over trade disputes and accusations of spying and technology theft.

Official criticism of H& M manifested that feeling of grievance at being to be affected by a friend.

“How can H& M feed Chinese rice and then smash China’s pot? ” state television said in a commentary on Wednesday.

On Thursday, internet users pointed to clothing labels Uniqlo of Japan and The Gap of the United Mood as other possible delinquents. It was unclear how many of those details were members of the public and how many were operated by the find party’s immense information apparatus.

Pop stellar Wang Yibo’s announcement that he was quitting as a Nike “brand ambassador” didn’t mention Xinjiang but said he “firmly withstands any words and actions that pollute China .”

Others including actor Huang Xuan and Song Qian, a vocalist and actress also known as Victoria Song who is a former member of Korean pop group f( x ), announced they would intention promotion agreements with H& M. Actress Tang Songyun said she was breaking ties with Nike.

Chinese athletic shoe brand ANTA announced it was pulling out of BCI, the industry cotton group.

Read more:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *