Democrats Blame Republicans for Defunding Police

Most of us recall as children get into a dispute with another baby and then blaming him for starting a fight. When Mom approached “youve said”, “he reached me first.” The other child disavows it and accuses you of thumping him firstly.

As adults we become more sophisticated when lying. That’s why White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said last week in a briefing that “Some might say that the other party was for defunding the police…” all because congressional Republicans won’t sign off on two “infrastructure” proposals.

Psaki is channeling the line of the working day from Democrats who want to divert attention from Democratic mayors and city councils across the country who have voted to take money away from police agencies, compelling cops to quit, retire and becoming it difficult to attract brand-new drafts.

The happenings say otherwise, that’s if realities content anymore.

Oakland, California, a city run and devastated by Democrats for years, decided to cut the police budget by $ 18 million while crime is spiraling out of control. Shootings in Oakland have increased by 70 percentage, homicides by 90 percentage and carjackings by 88 percentage. Crimes, assaults, and other crimes have also significantly increased.

Anyone who doesn’t see a connection between cutting police budgets and rising crime is inhaling narcotic, which by the way is becoming law in more countries.

At least 13 other cities have chipped police funds, municipalities all run by Democrats.

Forbes magazine is keeping track. Perhaps the most ridiculous decision, among many, is one made by the city council in Austin, Texas. Forbes reports it “vot( ed) unanimously to cut $ 150 million( roughly one-third) from the police budget, reinvesting much of that summing-up in social programs, including menu access, brutality prevention and abortion access.

How does “abortion access” reduce violent and property crime, specially since abortion is violence against innocent unborn human life?

It’s not that social programs are an untried policy to reduce crime. Trillions have been spent on them. “Midnight basketball” was tried during the Clinton administration on the theory that shooting hoops would dissuade teens from shooting each other. Like so many other feel-good curricula, this one failed to reach its stated destination. At least in that basketball bill was a provision to hire 100,000 added police officers.

The rationale we have the law and police officers sworn to enforce it( and politicians who make words to uphold the law) is that there are people who won’t obey the existing legislation under any circumstances. The left has used incidents of police brutality and alleged racist behavior to advance an schedule that sufferings the most people who want and need police shelter.

TV interviews of residents in cities and places with massive minority populations have shown they don’t want fewer police, but more. They don’t feel safe and now neither do increasing numbers of police officers who horror for their lives and occupations if they attempt to apprehend suspects.

Democrats have not been able to get apart with their ludicrous allegation that Republicans are responsible for defunding police without a compliant media and the supposed disappearing of Trump-era fact-checkers.

Thomas Jefferson was right when he said about liars: “He who permits himself to tell a lie once, discovers it much simpler to do it a second and third time,’ til at length it becomes habitual…”

Ms. Psaki, are you and your peer Democrat places great importance?

Read more:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *