Dalelorenzo's GDI Blog
18Aug/210

Should Unvaccinated People Be Put on No-Fly List?

In June 2021, the U.S. National Security Council secreted a brand-new “National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism” document. 1 While it’s being mainly formulated as a tool to fight White supremacy and political bigotry, the definition of what constitutes a “domestic terrorist” is incredibly vague and based on creeds rather than specific behaviors.

It’s not difficult to imagine this policy being used to silence political foe simply by labeling anyone who disagrees with the government as a domestic terrorist and billing them with a hate crime.

We’re previously verifying signs suggesting that this is the path we’re on. July 28, 2021, Dr. Peter Hotez published a paper2 in PLOS Biology titled “Mounting Antiscience Aggression in the United Commonwealth, ” in which he suggests praising Dr. Anthony Fauci and other scientists has to be labeled a “hate crime.” Commenting on the working paper, Paul Joseph Watson at Summit News writes: 3

“This is yet another transparent effort to dehumanize anti-lockdown demonstrators and demonize people who purely want to exercise bodily autonomy while elevating Fauci and his ilk to Pope-like status. Science isn’t supposed to be a religious creed that is set in stone, it’s an ever-evolving knowledge base that changes and improves thanks to dissent and skepticism.”

Science Depends on Questioning and Challenging Presumption

Attorney Jonathan Turley also responded to Hotez’s paper in an August 4, 2021, blog pole, saying: 4

“’Religion is a culture of religion; discipline is a culture of doubt.’ Feynman’s statement captivates how science depends upon constant question and difficult of presumptions ...

[ T] now remain important debates over not just the underlying science relation to Covid-1 9 but the implications for such science for public policies. Criminalizing the various aspects of that debate would ratchet up the threats against those with dissenting ends, including scientists. That would damage not just free speech but discipline in the long run.”

Should We Have Protected Years That Cannot Be Questioned?

Turley likewise notes how obliging scientists a protected class( and one would assume only those with specific political tilteds) is a slippery slope that will likely have inconvenient forks: 5

“The federal hate crime principles focus on basis of a person’s characteristics of race, belief, ethnicity, tribe, gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity. We have visualized calls for adding professings like police officer, which I likewise defended.

As with police officer, the inclusion of such professings would have a direct and inimical impact on free speech in national societies. Indeed, it would create a slippery slope as other professings requirement inclusion from reporters to diplomats to physicians. Hate crimes would speedily apply to a wide array of beings due to their occupations.”

Will America Accept No-Fly List for Unvaccinated?

Writing for The Atlantic, 6 onetime auxiliary secretary for Homeland Security Juliette Kayyem posits that people who do not want to be part of the COVID injection experiment “need to bear the burden” when it comes to preventing the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

“The number of COVID-1 9 subjects deters proliferating, even if they are outstandingly safe, effective vaccines are widely available, ” Kayyem writes. 7 “Many public organizations are responding by reimposing masking rules on everyone.

But at the present stage of the pandemic, tougher universal limiteds are not the solution to continuing viral spread. While flying, inoculated beings should no longer carry the burden for unvaccinated beings.

The White House has repudiated a nationwide inoculation edict ... but a no-fly list for unvaccinated adults is an self-evident stair that the federal government should take.

It will help limit the risk of transmission at destinations where unvaccinated beings excursion -- and, by establishing standards that restrict specific advantages to vaccinated parties, will too cure raise the stagnant vaccination rates that are maintaining both the economy and society from perfectly recovering.”

Travel Ban Identified as Effective Coercion Strategy

According to Kayyem, traveling in general and flying in particular is not a human right, and putting unvaccinated mortals on a no-fly list is a matter of national protection, in the sense that the country needs to protect itself from parties capable of spreading this dangerous virus.

She makes no mention of the scientifically proved reality that no one is of the COVID shots actually prevent you from getting infected, and that “vaccinated” mortals carry the same viral quantity as the unvaccinated, 8,9 which means they’re just as infectious. The main difference is that injected men might not realize that they’re carriers, as the primary impact when the injections do work is lessening manifestations of infection.

Kayyem likewise cites a New York Times and Kaiser Family Foundation poll in which 41% of unvaccinated respondents had said prohibition on airline wandering would sway its final decision, including 11% of those “adamantly opposed” to vaccination. In other commands, where free doughnuts and million-dollar lotteries have failed to coerce people to get the shot, an airline circulate boycott might do the trick.

Despite her onetime posture within government, she makes no mention of laws forbidding coercion of medical volunteers, such as the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 45 CFR 46( subpart A, the Belmont report ), 10 the Covenant on civil and political rights on Civil and Political Rights treaty, 11 the Declaration of Helsinki1 2 or the Nuremberg Code. 13 Supreme court rulings have also clarified that Americans have the right to choose their own health care in general. 14,15

Reframing to Confuse the Issue

Kayyem hints circumventing such basic human rights by reframing the question. She writes: 16

“The public debate about drawing vaccination a precondition for travel, employ, and other activities has described this approach as inoculation authorizations, a expression that ... suggests that unvaccinated parties are being sought around arbitrarily.

What is actually going on, chiefly, is that institutions are altering responsibilities to unvaccinated beings ... rather than imposing greater burdens on everyone.

Americans still have a choice to go unvaccinated, but that planneds giving up on sure-fire societal benefits. Nobody has a constitutional freedom to attend The Lion King on Broadway or work at Disney or Walmart ... People who still want to wait and see about the vaccines can continue doing so. They exactly can’t restrain pushing all the costs on everyone else.”

As pointed out by Swift Headline, 17 the owner of Atlantic magazine, Laurene Powell Jobs, the billionaire widow of Steve Jobs, owns two private jets herself, devoting her the freedom of the media to fly around the world at will, regardless what vaccine mandates might be in place. Many other ultra-rich beings would also be able to ignore the rules due to wealth alone, virtually turning them into a protected class. Swift Headline points out this projection: 18

“The Atlantic went on to say unvaccinated people who are exercising their individual privileges as free Americans' do not deserve’ to be a' protected class’ ...

Jobs’s wealth and class status is detailed in Breitbart News’ Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow’s book,' Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Decay, ’ which' exposures the obscured connections between the establishment media and the activist left.’

As Marlow details, Jobs’s past is a privileged one ... Jobs' married shaft and inherited a good deal of money, and her capital is tied together in some of world’s biggest companionships, ’ Marlow continues.' She is the establishment.’”

The Price of Admission to Society

August 2, 2021, the San Francisco Chronicle also published an belief piece1 9 by the Chronicle editorial board, in which they advocated we ought to “Make vaccination the price of admission to society.” One course to evaluate the reasonableness of such a hypothesi is to replace COVID “vaccination” with anything else. How about: “Make proof of contraception use the price of admission to prohibits and nightclubs.”

“Make clear skin the price of admission to gyms and public swimming pools.” “Make being taller than 5’ 9” the price of admission to theme parks.” “Make having a BMI below 25 the price of admission to airline flights.” “Make proof of not having an illness the price of admission to in-hospital care.”

According to the Chronicle editorial board, “the unvaccinated account for over 95% of hospitalizations and deaths.”2 0 The council is not quote where it got that data from, so let’s review the source of that data.

In an August 5, 2021, video account, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky noted that this statistic was obtained by looking at hospitalization and death data from January through June 2021 -- a timeframe during which the vast majority of the United Government population were unvaccinated.

The narrative that we’re in a' pandemic of the unvaccinated’ was created by exploiting statistics from a time period when the U.S. as a whole was largely unvaccinated. When you look at more recent data, present trends is swaying in the opposite direction.

January 1, 2021, merely 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had received one or more shots, 21 and as of June 15, 48.7% have been completely “vaccinated.”2 2

The CDC has also pointed out that you are not considered “fully vaccinated” until two weeks after your second dose( in the case of Pfizer or Moderna ), which is given six weeks after your firstly shot. 23 This meant that if you receive your first dose on June 1, you won’t be “fully vaccinated” until eight weeks later, around August 1.

So, the narrative that we’re in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” was created by exerting statistics from a time period when the U.S. as a whole was largely unvaccinated. When you look at more recent data, present trends is swinging in the opposite direction.

Vaccinated Now Comprise the Bulk of Hospitalizations

For example, August 1, 2021, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, chairman of Israel’s Public Health Work, announced half of all COVID-1 9 illness were among the fully injected. 24

A few days later, August 5, Dr. Kobi Haviv, chairman of the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that 95% of severely ill COVID-1 9 patients are perfectly inoculated, and that they make up 85% to 90% of COVID relevant hospitalizations overall. 25

In Scotland, official data on hospitalizations and demises testify 87% of those who have died from COVID-1 9 in the third wave that began in early July were inoculated, 26 and in Gibraltar, which has a 99% COVID jab compliance rate, COVID clients have risen by 2,500% since June 1, 2021.27

A CDC investigation of an outbreak in Barnstable County, Massachusetts between July 6 through July 25, 2021, learnt 74% of those who received a diagnosis of COVID1 9, and 80% of hospitalizations, were among the amply inoculated. 28,29 Most, but not all, had the Delta variant.

“What the breakthrough cases appear to show is that the delta variant of the coronavirus is more easily carried and transmitted by injected people than its predecessors, ” the Chronicle editorial board writes. 30

“In any case, the greater apparent transmissibility of the variant builds it that much more important to protect as many parties as is practicable from severe COVID by increasing inoculation rates.”

What the board appears to be saying is that unvaccinated people must be protected against severe infection, against their will, if need be, and the most efficient way to do that is to discriminate against them and treat them like second-class citizens.

Again, a simple way to check the reasonableness of this argument is to swap out the COVID reference for something else. How about, “It’s important to protect as numerous people as possible from dying in automobile collisions by fostering vehicle tolls so fewer people can get behind the wheel.”

Can' Big Brother’ Save You From a Virus?

As early as April 2020, The Times in the U.K. weighed in with similar suggestions, territory “We need Big Brother to beat this virus.”3 1 Clare Foges, the author of the piece in question, went on to say, “Don’t make the political liberty foyer blind us given the fact that greater position surveillance, including ID cards, is required.”

The argument that Big Brother can protect us from infection is outlandish on its face, because no extent of parties surveillance can avoid microscopic viruses from circulating.

The No. 1 region of viral spread is in institutions, such as nursing homes and infirmaries, more the staff within them are among the most well-trained in pathogenic controller. If drilled hospital faculty can’t prevent the spread of viruses, how can government officials do it?

Importantly, the reason that we need vaccine passports to prove we’re “clean” enough to participate in society immediately falls apart when you take into account the fact that the COVID shots do not provide immunity. You can still be infected, carry the virus and spread it to others.

We’ve already seen various examples of situations where 100% of beings were fully “vaccinated” against COVID-1 9 hitherto an eruption appeared. We’ve even considered over 100 amply COVID introduced parties die from COVID in one state alone, Massachusetts, 32 so it is likely there are now many thousands of perfectly “vaccinated” who have died from COVID.

Even a 100% Vaccination Rate Cannot Eliminate COVID

Most recently, Carnival cruise words experienced an eruption despite every last person on that ship having proof of COVID “vaccination.”3 3 The cruise liner had even intentionally shortened ability from 4,000 to 2,800 to provide ample social distancing capability. None of the measures acted. People got sick anyway, which obligates perfect gumption if you be reminded that the shot doesn’t provide immunity, merely symptom reduction.

Cases such as these clearly reveal that even if everyone gets the shot, SARS-CoV-2 will mutate and continue to circulate, taking beings out here and there. To think that giving up basic rights and naturalness are responding simply isn’t logical. Taking responsibility for your own health is, and that includes deciding if and how you want to protect yourself from SARS-CoV-2.

Not everyone is deathly afraid of COVID-1 9. Many realize there are safe and effective treatments available, such as the Front Line COVID-1 9 Critical Care Alliance’s I-MASS Prevention and At-Home Treatment protocol and I-MASK+ Early Outpatient Treatment protocol.

Nebulized hydrogen peroxide can also be used for prevention and treatment of COVID-1 9, as detailed in Dr. David Brownstein’s case paper3 4 and Dr. Thomas Levy’s free e-book, “Rapid Virus Recovery.” And if there’s effective treatment, there’s little need to risk permanent side effects from an experimental gene technology that can only ply a shrink wander of protection in the first place.

Read more: articles.mercola.com

Comments (0) Trackbacks (0)

No comments yet.


Leave a comment

No trackbacks yet.