Dalelorenzo's GDI Blog

What Biden’s Vaccine Mandate Means for You

September 9, 2021, in a sweeping ministerial dictate, 1 president Joe Biden mandated all U.S. business with 100 or more employees to require COVID vaccination or weekly testing, or face federal fines of up to $ 14,000 per contravention. Biden likewise told businesses to give time off to employees to receive the injections.

Biden is also command all federal employees and federal contractors to get the shots. For unidentified grounds, postal workers and members of Congress and their staff are exempt from the vaccine mandatory. Biden did not make any exceptions for persons who have already had COVID and recovered, and therefore have antibodies to the virus.

Joe Biden told Americans when he was elected that he would not foisted inoculation edicts. He lied.~ Ronna McDaniel, GOP Chairwoman

He also said he’d use his “power as president" against any bos unwilling to follow the lineup "to get them out of the way.”2 Biden may be biting off more than he can munch, nonetheless, because as of September 11, 2021, 28 positions were already propagandizing back against federal inoculation authorizations. 3

Many States Vow to Fight Back Unconstitutional Mandate

The backlash was swift. The Republican National Committee promptly announced they would sue the Biden administration for problem an “unconstitutional mandate.” GOP Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel questioned a statement: 4

“Joe Biden told Americans when he was elected that he has not been able to impose vaccine commissions. He lied. Now small businesses, works, and kinfolks across the country will pay the price.

Like many Americans, I am pro-vaccine and anti-mandate. Many small businesses and workers do not have the money or legal resources to fight Biden’s unconstitutional actions and autocratic edicts, but when his ordinance goes into effect, the RNC will litigate the administration to protect Americans and their liberties.”

Nebraska Republican Sen. Ben Sasse told the Daily Caller: 5

“President Biden is so desperate to distract from his shameful, incompetent Afghanistan exit that he is saying crazy things and pushing constitutionally flawed ministerial orders.

This is a sardonic attempt to pick a fight and distract from the President’s morally deplorable decision to leave Americans behind Taliban routes on the 20 th anniversary of 9/11. This isn’t how you beat COVID, but it is how you run a distraction expedition -- it’s gross and the American people shouldn’t fall for it.”

In a series of tweets, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem stated: 6,7

“South Dakota will stand up to defend discretion @JoeBiden told you in courtroom, ” and “My legal crew is standing by ready to file our lawsuit the time Joe Biden registers his unconstitutional govern. This gross precedent of federal intrusion will not stand.”

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp also issued a statement saying he intends to “pursue every legal alternative available” to halt Biden’s “blatantly prohibited overreach, ” as did Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, who in a tweet stated :8

“This is exactly the various kinds of large-hearted authority overreach we have tried so hard to prevent in Arizona -- now the Biden-Harris administration is hammering down on private businesses and individual freedoms in an exceptional and dangerous way. This will never stand up in court.

This despotic coming is wrong, un-American and will do far more harm than good. How many proletarians will be dislocated? How numerous adolescents remained out of classrooms? How numerous enterprises penalized? The inoculation is and should be a choice. We must and will push back.”

Florida Governments Face Fines if Following Biden’s Order

In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis countered Biden’s edict with one of his own. Any local government that makes COVID vaccination a requirement for employment will be fined $ 5,000 per misdemeanor. 9 During a September 13, 2021, press conference, DeSantis said 😛 TAGEND

“We are gonna stand for the men and women who are serving us. We are going to protect Florida hassles. We are not gonna to let beings be fired because of a vaccine authorization.

You don't just cast aside people who have been provide reliably over this issue, over what's basically a personal choice on their individual health. We cannot tell these tribes be toss away. We cannot permit their jobs to be destroyed."

I was going to include DeSantis’ speech in this article, but it has since been deleted for “violating YouTube’s community guidelines.” Imagine that, that they would actually remove a legally elected governor’s opinion on this topic because it flouts their autocratic tyranny.

Biden Is Clearly Out of Legal Bounds

Biden’s executive order is unlikely to stand up in field, appreciating how federal ordinance restricts the mandating of emergency use products, which by definition are experimental. As are outlined in a May 2021 report by The Defender: 10

“The bottom line is this: mandating makes authorized for Emergency Use Authorization status( EUA) violates federal ordinance as detailed in the following legal notifications. 11

All COVID inoculations, COVID PCR and antigen research, and masks are purely EU-Aauthorized , no or licensed, by the federal government. Long-term safety and efficacy has not been able to been proven.

EUA commodities are by definition experimental, which requires people be given the right to refuse them. Under the Nuremberg Code, the foundation of ethical drug , no one may be pressured involved in a medical venture. Consent of the person concerned is' absolutely essential.’

Earlier this year, Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense president and general counsel, and advocate Greg Glaser stated that federal regulation vetoes supervisors from mandating EUA COVID vaccines( or EUA COVID-1 9 measures or disguises ). Holland and Glaser wrote: 12

'If a inoculation has been issued EUA by the FDA, it is not fully licensed and must be voluntary. A private defendant, such as an employer, institution or hospital cannot bypas the EUA law, which prohibits mandates. Indeed, the EUA law preventing mandates is so explicit that there is only one precedent subject regarding an attempt to mandate an EUA vaccine.’”

If you’re like most, you’re probably judging, “Well, Biden’s executive order came after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration passed full admiration to the Pfizer/ BioNTech COVID shot Comirnaty, so the inoculation is not under EUA.” You’d be partially right. But largely wrong.

The Difference Between Pfizer’s BNT1 62 b2 Shot and Comirnaty

The FDA did indeed give full permission to Comirnaty, but that product is not predicted to be available for over a year. The only Pfizer shot an existing, called BNT1 62 b2, remains under EUA. We have the FDA to thank for this unusual and befuddling situation, but the key take-home is that while sanction has been granted to Comirnaty, that make is not obtainable.

The FDA demands BNT1 62 b2 to be viewed as interchangeable with Comirnaty, but from a legal perspective they clearly are not same. BNT1 62 b2, being under EUA, is indemnified against monetary liability, whereas Comirnaty, formerly it becomes available, is not have that obligation shield( unless Pfizer/ BioNTech manage to get indebtednes shielding for that concoction before its secrete ).

In other statements, if you’re disabled by the BNT1 62 b2, your exclusively recourse is to apply for compensation from the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Act( CICP ). 13 Compensation from CICP is very limited and hard to get. In its 15 -year history, it has paid under simply 29 demands, fewer than 1 in 10. 14,15, 16

You only qualify if your harm necessitates hospitalization and makes in substantial disability and/ or extinction, and even though they are you fulfill the eligibility criteria, it requires you to use up your private health insurance before it knocks in to pay the difference.

There’s no refund for hurting and suffer, merely lost incomes and unpaid medical invoices. This intends a retired person cannot qualify even if they die or be brought to an end in a wheelchair. Salary compensation is of limited duration, and covered at $50,000 a year, and the CICP’s decision cannot be appealed.

If ordinary circumstances apply to Comirnaty, were you to be injured by that dose, you’d be able to sue for shatters under the national Vaccine Injury Compensation Plan( VICP ), 17 so from a legal view, there’s a rather significant difference between these two products.

Legal Notifications You Can Use

If your supervisor or institution requires you to get a COVID shot, be able to use the law notifications provided by the Children’s Health Defense legal unit. The notices inform employers and educational institutions that they are violating federal law.

Three separate notices are available for download from the Children’s Health Defense Legal Resource page; 18 one for mask edicts, one for PCR testing and a third for vaccines. There, you can also find information on how to request a religious exemption for COVID-1 9 vaccine mandatories in the workplace.

Vaccine Mandate Heralds Communist Style Social Credit System

In a September 13, 2021, bout of Fox News’ Fox& Friends, co-host Rachel Campos-Duffy warned that vaccine mandates are “the beginning of the communist-style social recognition structure, ” adding: 19

“Dr. Anthony Fauci is now saying that if you don’t have the vaccine, you shouldn’t be able to have air travel. I imply, this happens in China. In China ... if you don’t agree with the government, you can’t get on a set. They block you. They have a way to do that, and this is the beginningof that method where if you’re a rebel, if you don’t agree with the party in strength, you will be punished.”

Are we racing toward a social recognition organisation where behavior is either rewarded or punished based on the whims of those in charge of information systems? Biden’s refusal to make exceptions for those with natural exemption, who by no stretch of the imagination actually need or benefit from a COVID shot, seems to indicate we’re surely ability that way.

Giving parties with natural exemption a state passport won’t work for the technocratic elite because the naturally immune aren’t on a inoculation subscription. The entire extent of having a vaccine passport is that you lose your freedom every time a new booster buns out. You either get the booster or lose your freedom.

People with natural exemption can’t be roped into this control scheme. What are they going to force the naturally immune to do in order to keep a valid passport? They can’t make money off natural immunity, and they can’t use it to control.

In a September 13, 2021, letter to Biden, Consumer Brands Association CEO Geoff Freeman registered 19 of 50 questions received from its member firms. 20 Among those questions is whether Biden’s executive order includes religious or medical exceptions, including exception due to natural immunity.

As reported by Newsweek, 21 details of Biden’s plan will be ironed out by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration( OSHA ), but in the meantime, Freeman called on the Biden administration to address some of the most pressing questions.

OSHA Lets Employers Off the Hook for Vaccine Injuries

Speaking of OSHA, in May 2021, the agency quietly revoked2 2 the requirement2 3 for employers who mandate the vaccine to record side effects as a work-related event. By doing so, OSHA counteracted itself and employers from having to pay out workers’ comp if an employee is injured by a mandated COVID shot. OSHA tried to justify its decision, territory 😛 TAGEND

"OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of intimidating works from receiving COVID-1 9 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination tries.

As a reaction, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904 ’s chronicle requirements to require any employers to record craftsman side effects from COVID-1 9 vaccination through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s arrangement at that time to determine very good course of action moving forward."

People With Natural Immunity Turn to the Law

In the days ahead, our justice system is bound to clog up with suits against employers, schools and governments alike. Constitution prof Todd Zywicki recently sued2 4 George Mason University in Virginia over their vaccine edict, as he has natural exemption. Zywicki discussed his lawsuit in an August 6, 2021, Wall Street Journal commentary. 25

His lawsuit pointed out that beings with natural exemption have an increased risk of adverse reactions to the COVID shot -- distributed according to one study2 6 up to 4.4 eras the health risks of clinically significant side effects -- and that the requirement infringes due process privileges, the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment, and is noncompliant with the Emergency Use Authorization. 27

August 17, 2021, George Mason University caved before the suit went to trial and granted Zywicki a medical exemption. 28 Unfortunately, the school did not revise its general policy.

A number of other lawsuits have also been filed, including one by more than a dozen students and Children’s Health Defense against Rutgers University in New Jersey, 29 and one by six Oregon workers who are suing the state on dirts that they already have natural exemption. 30 The plaintiffs include two corrections officers, an EMT, a medical agency director, a school bus motorist and a special agent in charge of an Oregon Department of Justice investigatory unit.

Jason Dudash, administrator of the Oregon chapter of the Freedom Foundation, which is representing the state works, accused Oregon Gov. Kate Brown of becoming “power-hungry amid the pandemic.” “The courts needs to determine a more logical, science-based approach, ” he said. 31

Military Service Members Sue Over Vaccine Mandate

Military service representatives with natural immunity are also suing the Department of Defense, the FDA and the Department of Health and Human Service. As reported by The Defender: 32

“The lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Staff Sergeant Daniel Robert and Staff Sergeant Holli Mulvihill, allege U.S. Sec. of Defense Lloyd Austin dismissed the DOD’s own regulations and formed an entirely new definition of' full immunity’ as being achievable simply by vaccination.

According to the lawsuit, the military’s existing laws and regulations unequivocally equip the exception the plaintiffs seek under Army Regulation 40 -5 62 (' AR 40 -5 62 ’ ), which provides substantiated survivors of an infection a presumptive medical exemption from vaccination because of the natural exemption acquired as a result of having survived the infection ...

Dr. Admiral Brett Giroir, HHS assistant secretary, set forth in an interrogation Aug. 24 with Fox News:' So natural immunity, it’s very important ... There are still no data to suggest inoculation immunity is better than natural immunity. I review both are highly protective.’

Yet on the same day, Austin issued a memo mandating the part Armed Forces be vaccinated, in which he wrote:' Those with previous COVID-1 9 infection shall not be regarded as amply vaccinated.’

In that memoranda, plaintiffs allege Austin organized a brand-new period and perception, which affirms the plain language of DOD’s own regulations, long-standing immunology practice, medical ethics codes and the immense force of scientific manifestation regarding this specific virus.

Plaintiffs claim Austin, who is not a doctor, reformed the DOD’s own regulation without supplying' a scintilla of indicate to patronize it.’ They too allege Austin originated the regulation change without going through the required rulemaking process, in contravention of the Administrative Procedures Act review.”

The lawsuit also points out that Pfizer’s Phase 3 trials, which is the phase in which long-term side effects are detected, won’t be completed until 2023. Moreover, the lawsuit spotlights the fact that Pfizer unblinded the two cohorts in the middle of the test and eliminated the authority group by offering the real “vaccine” to all controls.

In so doing, Pfizer turned research studies from a placebo-controlled blinded trouble into an open observational study, and the FDA allowed it. Observational studies carry nowhere near the same value as placebo-controlled trials, as you don’t have anything to compare the treatment group against. It’s very easy to forget even severe gashes when you have no control group.

Fauci Warns There Will Be' Many More Vaccine Mandates’

As we approach the two-year differentiate of this pandemic, it’s time for our judicial system to kick down and protect the public. The disaster superpowers granted to governors are not supposed to last forever, and the rights yielded us by the U.S. Constitution were never intended to be suspended and tossed aside in times of medical disasters. It’s time this rampant lawlessness got reined in.

Whether or not that will happen remains to be seen. What we can be sure of is that if our law system fails to do its duty, the beacon of freedom in this world will be lost. As reported by CNN, 33 Fauci is out there warning that “if more parties aren't persuaded to get inoculated by messaging from state public officials and' relied political messengers, ’ additional edicts from schools and jobs may be necessary.”

The technocratic elite will take it all the way because they are fighting for the Great Reset. And the Great Reset won’t work if parties are free. They need leveraging over specific populations, which is precisely what vaccine passports are all about.

Jacobson v. Massachusetts: A Ruling With Tragic Consequences

In closing, those who support the mandating of experimental COVID shots will typically point to the 1905 Jacobson v. Massachusetts case, which is often interpreted as apply government the right to force vaccinate everyone for the common good. However, as noted by Alex Berenson in a recent blog announce, 34 we ought to really look at the time at which that decision was given.

In the years circumventing the 1905 Jacobson v. Massachusetts verdict, the U.S. United states supreme court also regulated in favor of racial discrimination, corporate monopoly, child labor and performing questioning government a jailable pique. That same year, in 1905, they settled employees have no rights. In 1923, they ruled minimum wages principles are illegal and in 1927 they OK’d forced sterilization based on the Jacobson ruling.

Most of these verdicts have all along been been invalidated, and for obvious rationalizations. Most beings don’t agree with racial discrimination, monopolies and child labor anymore. Most agree that minimum wage rules are a good thing, and that questioning government is an unassailable right that is necessary for democracy to work. The 1905 Jacobson v. Massachusetts case is no different. It was drawn in and for a different duration, when individual and subject of human rights were routinely quashed.

As noted by National Vaccine Information Center president Barbara Loe Fisher in “How Fear of a Virus Changed Our World”: 35

“Using bad reasoning and bad discipline while leaning heavily on the pseudo-ethic of utilitarianism, state governments were given the green light to legally necessary vaccination based on a' common belief’ that vaccination is safe and effective, rather than proven reality.

Piously waving the greater good pennant to justify throwing political liberty out the door, the court majority ruled that citizens do not have a legal right to be free at all times because there are' manifold self-restraints to which every person is necessarily subjected for the common good’ ...

But the justices too warned that mandatory vaccination regulations should not be forced on a person whose physical health would become vaccination' cruel and inhuman to the last degree.’ They said 😛 TAGEND

'We are not to be understood as holding that the statute was intended to be applied in such a case or, if it was so intended, that the judiciary would not be competent to interfere and safeguard the health and life of the individual concerned.' All regulations, ’ this Court has said,' shall be given a sensible construction’ ...

During this time of horror and fluster, the Jacobson ruling likewise reminds us that it is democratically elected representatives in state assemblies who make public health laws governing people living in different territory. That is because what is not defined in the U.S. Constitution as a federal work is reserved for the states, which is an important check on federal government power.

Elected lawmakers in your district can choose to mandate a few or many vaccines with or without exemptions, while the federal government has the authority to commission vaccinations for people opening the U.S. or traversing commonwealth borders.”

Read more: articles.mercola.com


Tesco and WWF launch climate-friendly cattle feed scheme for dairy farmers

Tesco and WWF launch climate-friendly cattle feed scheme for dairy farmers

Tesco dairy farmers to receive 80 per cent seed give for seeds and herbs it claims can improve animal diseases, spray and soil quality while also cutting releases

Tesco has teamed up with conservation group WWF to launch a new aid intrigue designed to expand the market for sustainable cattle feed for dairy farmers, the supermarket heavyweight uncovered yesterday.

The scheme furnishes 15 farmers in Tesco's Sustainable Dairy Group an 80 per cent subsidy to plant herbal leys, a mixture of flowers, legumes and herbs which are designed to offer health feed for dairy cows while also enriching the clay and improving irrigate character, it interpreted. The feed assortment can also help to reduce the carbon footprint of farms, as it does not need as much artificial nitrogen fertiliser to grow, and even captivates more carbon than other grasses.

The dairy farmers are then also offered competitive rates for their milk to ensure they have enough money to invest in animal welfare and environmental sustainability, Tesco added.

Tom Atkins, Tesco's agriculture manager, indicated by the new strategy would help support the supermarket's aim to halve the environmental impact of its customers' average patronizing basket, by targeting the high-pitched carbon emissions combined with the dairy industry.

"We want to ensure we're do all we can to continue to support our farmers and, in this critical decade for climate and sort, assist realize our dairy farms some of the most sustainable in the world, " said Atkins. "We will continue to work with our farmers to both abbreviate carbon emissions and continue to increase the amount of biodiversity on farm. We will likewise be working together on more innovative initiatives like our herbal leys project, which should introduce massive benefits to its implementation of clay state and biodiversity."

The initiative forms part of an ongoing partnership between Tesco and WWF, and the two plan to continue subsidising seed costs for farmers for the next two years, with deem to potentially offering more farmers the chance to take part in the scheme in future.

Tesco also said it was also planning further measures to cut farm carbon emissions, improve grunge excellence, shorten water habit and improve biodiversity. Since 2016 Tesco sustainable Dairy Group farmers have cut their emissions by 6.5 per cent, but the supermarket said it was now targeting a further 10 per cent of cases cut in radiations by 2025.

Among the 15 farmers already involved in the trial are Amie Lovatt and her husband Chris, who moved a raise in Cheshire. Lovatt said the couple "jumped at the chance to be included in the ordeal as it's important that we all have to find the balance between producing affordable and healthy food and looking after the environment we live in".

"We believe that herbal leys could stipulate a excellent provide answers to that as not only will they improve grime health and formation thanks to their deep beginnings but are also little reliant on artificial fertilisers, " she added.

Read more: businessgreen.com


Get unbreakable online security for under £2 a month with CyberGhost VPN

A two-year subscription to CyberGhost VPN is on sale.

SAVE 85%: A two-year subscription to CyberGhost VPN is on sale for PS1. 63 per month as of Sept. 11, and includes an extra two months for free.

CyberGhost VPN is one of the biggest appoints in the cybersecurity competition, and that's because it gives a good deal of advanced features with an handsome and user-friendly interface.

Users get apps for all heading operating systems, around the clock customer support, and seven simultaneous relationships. CyberGhost VPN also provides access to over 7,000 assure servers set all regions of the world, which sees this VPN one of the best options for unlocking stream locates like Netflix.

With all of this in mind, you're probably thinking that CyberGhost VPN comes with a fee price tag. We get why you would think that, but it's actually not the case. A two-year subscription to CyberGhost VPN is on sale for PS1. 63 per month as of Sept. 11, saving you 85% on list price. This dismissed mean also includes an extra two months of protection for free.

If you're unsure about hit such commitments, CyberGhost VPN offers a somewhat magnanimous 45 -day money-back guarantee. This means you can recover your money if you're not totally satisfied.

Save 85% on a procure subscription to CyberGhost VPN.

Save 85% on CyberGhost VPN

Credit: CyberGhost VPN

Save 85% on CyberGhost VPN

Buying Options

See Details

Explore pertained content:

How to unblock and watch American Netflix in the UK

The best streaming places for watching all your beloved shows

The best VPN distributes in September 2021

Read more: mashable.com


What Is a Yod in Astrology? What The Finger of God Means in a Birth Chart

by mizChartreuse

Do you believe in free will, demise or both? A Yod in your astrology chart can indicate that you're here for a unique spiritual undertaking.

While we all have the power to choose a good part of our predestination, the birth chart is a map to some of the spiritual challenges and jobs we may face in order to grow.

A small number of people are born with a rare formation in their astrology planneds called a Yod, also known as the" finger of God" or" finger of fate ." The Yod is often found in the charts of people whose lives are colored by strength and constant readjustment.

The musician Prince had two Yods in his natal planned. Princess Diana and both of her sons, William and Harry, have birth charts with Yods. Meghan Markle has a double Yod as well.

Yod in Astrology - Prince Yod in Birth Chart

What does a Yod look like in a birth chart and how does a Yod work?

In astrology, a Yod is a unique formation between at least three planets. It looks like a tall, thin triangle.

A Yod aspect pattern is an equilateral triangle made of two planets in sextile( 60 magnitudes) to one another, with both of them modelling an embarrassing 150 -degree quincunx( or inconjunct) inclination to a third planet.

The sextile planets are two zodiac signs apart and form an easy tilt, meaning they tend to communicate and cooperate with each other naturally.

However, both of these planets is a challenging five mansions apart( quincunx) to the planet at the apex of the Yod. The quincunx planet is in a zodiac sign that constitutes an awkward force of friction and change, interrupting the freedom between the two sextile planets.

In Prince's birth chart( above ), you can see that he has not one, but TWO Yods. One points to his 0 grade Defaces in Aries, the other to his 0 position North Node in Scorpio.

The Yod triangles are indicated by the light-green dotted( inconjunct) courses connected by a short blue-blooded( sextile) base.

According to astrologer Kevin Burk, the planet forming the two quincunx sides, called the apex planet, is required to be the fastest-moving of the three planets in order to be allowed to for the configuration to be a “true” Yod. A planet's rush is determined by how close it is to the Sun( the moon/ Mercury being the fastest, Pluto the slowest ). By Burk's theory, Pluto can never be the apex planet, while the moon( the fasted-moving “planet”) can never be one of the base planets. Not all astrologers agree with this theory, but it's worth considering.

What does the yod exemplify?

A Yod is relatively rare, and can be seen as “fated.”

In any planned, an inconjunct/ quincunx facet is a challenge because the zodiac signs involved speak different languages by element, modality and polarity. As such, they require flexibility--like living with a roommate who has radically different prices, political reclines and wonts from yours.

Since a Yod involves three or more planets, that potentially chaotic impression is multiplied--and necessaries finesse to navigate.

The natural predilection between planets in vistum is to look for a target of offset and accommodation. The Yod's challenge is that the 150 -degree quincunx aspect connects zodiac signs with no common ground. Thus, there is no point of counterbalance, creating a frustrating dynamic that stymies progress or foliages the person feeling like every select they constitute comes with a sacrifice.

The Yod is also described as embodying" a crisis in timing ." Since the three zodiac signs involved speak different languages, when a Yod is activated, there are multiple, distinct access that the person can respond to a challenge. To resolve the tension, one of the two planets has to act in a manner that is contrary and uncomfortable to the nature of its sign.

How do Yod-bearers experience life?

Yods epitomize patterns in families that have previous for contemporaries. Carriers of the" Finger of Fate" can also feel insecure, or have trouble expressing themselves. They may find themselves in surprising situations. Beings with Yods in their planned have a restlessness, a sense of their unique purpose and a calling to be their genuine souls at any outlay.

The discomfort of a Yod tends to manifest more in the mental and feelings realms. Yod people may ever feel like some crucial understanding or piece of information is missing--one that would help transcend the rub sense that things are not quite as they should be.

If you have one or more yods, the following points suffers may be familiar:

You are not aware of how the Yod actually shows itself

You derive strong, returning responses from your environment that you don't understand

Your mothers had trouble apprehend you as small children( and as young adults)

You ploy through intense occasions that they are able to burst other people's atmospheres

You ordeal things "out of the blue" that are beyond the pale of general life-time happens

What pass your course often involves some scare, outrage, certificate menace, or some other unpleasant statu over which you cannot practise any affect. Strange events simply "happen," often out of the blue

How the Yod announces you forth: Spiritual assigning of a Yod

Simply employed, the role of Yod bearer is to break ancestral decorations. Yods are strange, but also reasonably metaphysical and fated. Those who have Yods in birth certificates shows are here to shed light upon structures that going to go unaddressed for contemporaries.

Yod countrymen know they have a distinct function of being in the world. Whether it is possible they ever actually discover or pursue their purpose, their continued existence interrupts the status quo.

Yods and the British royal family

Princess Diana, bear July 1, 1961, had a Yod in her astrological graph with Mercury( in Cancer) and Pluto( in Virgo) at the basi, pointing to an apex of Jupiter in Aquarius in her second home of money and toil. When we look at how activated Yods disrupt ancient patterns, their own lives in the British Royal family was certainly a catalyst for revolutionary changes.

In the book Diana: Her True Story, Diana stimulated notes about ever feeling different, like she was carrying a burden that she was unable to articulate, but always knew was there. Her intuition, she said, informed her that lifetime would be a winding road, ever feeling segregated from others; never feeling in the best place.

That is quite the description of how the Yod offices in an individual!

It’s worth noting that both Diana’s grandmother and father had secret said that he hoped that she is increasingly becoming the Princess of Wales, and that was fulfilled in Diana’s life. However, Diana herself never felt happy about it, and we know how that "fairy tale" culminated for her.

Even stranger? Both Princess Diana’s children, Monarches William and Harry, have Yods in their graphs as well! Prince William’s yod has a wound-healing theme, placing at his Venus+ Chiron in Taurus, with Libra Pluto and Sagittarius Neptune at the base.

Prince Harry has two yods in his map: the first has a base of Scorpio Pluto to Sagittarius Neptune/ Capricorn Jupiter, all drawn attention to his 0 grade Gemini North Node of predestination. The second yod has a base of Sagittarius Mars and Libra Venus, pointing to his Taurus Moon, the luminary which represents the mother in astrology.When Monarch Harry married American actress Meghan Markle, the world was abuzz and the new Duchess dealt with endless criticism and outright intolerance. Duchess Meghan also has two yods in her plot, one pointing to her Taurus Chiron with a Libra Pluto and Sagittarius Neptune basi; the other pointing to her Neptune, with a base of Chiron sextile her Cancer Ascendant.

We can clearly see that the yod moves in lineages, as it does is applied to generational know-hows toy out over epoch. Prince William’s wife, Kate Middleton, does not have a yod, and their lives have relatively toed the line when it comes to royal duties.

In contrast, the younger Prince Harry and his wife Duchess Meghan both have two yods, and their grouped together performed billows unlike anything seen in the history of that clas. Drawing from what he saw the press do to his mother until she died, Harry refused to allow history repeat itself with his wife Meghan, who said she was suicidal at times. After not having certificate, and upon learning that their new child wouldn’t have a title, Harry and Megan chose to step down from their imperial duties and depart from the United Kingdom for the United Commonwealth, where they currently live.

6 gratuities for living with a yod

From Karan Hamaker-Zondag's" The Yod Book" -

1. Live out and ordeal sensations; don't be overpowered or swept apart by them

2. Retain integrity at all costs; dare to become aware of who you are, in spite of your doubts

3. Watch out that you don't fix exaggerated religious evaluate to anything outside yourself

4. Try not to do anything too progressive( as in upheaving and discontinuing your life to procreate drastic varies ); try to pick up the strand of their own lives as much as possible

5. Don't be afraid to run into a jam

6. Dare to wait and dare to let things take their track as they will

The paradox is: disintegrations are actually the unusually behavior to get out of a jam, so don’t fear them. In information, welcome them! Hamaker-Zondag’s guidance is to imagine that when everything seems hopeless, senseless, or without prospect, something deep inside you is budding and will soon be of great value.Humans love to jump into “doing” mode to “fix” difficulties, but everyone can benefit from the practice of starting with looking at how they are being. If you have a yod and are experiencing challenge, give it be. Mixtures automatically present themselves, often without your having had to do anything for it. Simply look for and discover the seeds.

So although yods are strange, the answer to a yod organisation is literally this: simply be mutable.

Black& lily-white yod explain from http :// theastrologydictionary.com

The post What Is a Yod in Astrology? What The Finger of God Mean in a Birth Chart emerged first on Astrostyle: Astrology and Daily, Weekly, Monthly Horoscopes by The AstroTwins.

Read more: astrostyle.com


More Good News on Ivermectin

When it comes to the treatment of COVID-1 9, numerous Western nations have been hobbled by the politicization of medication. Throughout 2020, media and countless public health professionals warned against the use of hydroxychloroquine( HCQ ), despite the fact that numerous practicing doctors were praising its ability to save patients. Most have been stillness through online censoring. Some even lost their jobs for the “sin” of publicly sharing their success with the drug.

Another decades-old antiparasitic narcotic that may be even more useful than HCQ is ivermectin. Like HCQ, ivermectin is on the World Health Organization’s list of crucial stimulants, but its benefits are also being ignored by public health officials and immersed by mainstream media.

Ivermectin is a heartworm medication that has was demonstrated to impede SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro. 1 In the U.S ., the Frontline COVID-1 9 Critical Care Alliance( FLCCC) has been calling for widespread adoption of Ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-1 9.2, 3

In the video above, Dr. John Campbell interrogations Dr. Tess Lawrie about the pharmaceutical and its utilize against COVID-1 9. Lawrie is a medical doctor and Ph.D. researcher who has done a lot of work in South Africa.

She’s also the director of Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd ., 4 which has its headquarters in the U.K ., and she cured unionize the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development( BIRD) panel5 and the International Ivermectin for COVID Conference, viewed April 24, 2021.

Ironically, as a consultant to the World Health Organization and many other public health arrangements, her largest buyers are the exceedingly ones who today actively muffling the use of this drug.

Ivermectin Useful in All Stages of COVID

What constitutes ivermectin particularly useful in COVID-1 9 is that there slogs both in the initial viral phase of the illness, when antivirals are expected, as well as the inflammatory stage, when the viral consignment plummets off and anti-inflammatories become necessary.

According to Dr. Surya Kant, a medical doctor in India who has written a white paper6 on ivermectin, the remedy abbreviates replication of the SARS-CoV-2 virus by several thousand times. 7 Kant’s paper produced various Indian regions to start using ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and as medication for COVID-1 9 in the summer of 2020.8

In the video, Lawrie examines the social sciences behind her recommendation to use ivermectin. In summary 😛 TAGEND

* A scientific review by Dr. Andrew Hill at Liverpool University, funded by the WHO and UNITAID and published January 18, 2021, knew ivermectin abbreviated COVID-1 9 extinctions by 75%. It also increased viral authorization. This finding was based on a review of six randomized, held ordeals involving a total of 1,255 patients.

* Lawrie’s meta-analysis, published February 8, 2021, located a 68% reduced by demises. Now, 13 studies were included in the analysis. This, she illustrates, is an underestimation of the helpful impact, since they are included a study in which the ascertain appendage was given HCQ.

Since HCQ is an active care that has also been shown to have a positive impact on outcomes, it’s not surprising that this particular study did not rate ivermectin as better than the restraint medicine( which was HCQ ).

* Contributing two brand-new randomized restraint trials to her February analysis that included data on mortality, Lawrie published an updated analysis March 31, 2021, explain a 62% reduction in deaths.

When four studies with increased risk of bias were removed during a precede sense analysis, they culminated up with a 72% reduced by extinctions. Sensitivity evaluations are done to double-check and confirm results.

WHO Still Was unwilling to Recommend Ivermectin

Curiously, when the WHO finally updated its lead on ivermectin at the end of March 2021,9, 10 they held it a thumbs-down, saying more data are needed. They simply recommend it for patients who are enrolled in a clinical experiment. Yet they based their negative recommendation on a review that included precisely five studies, which ended up presenting a 72% reduction in deaths.

Lawrie points out gaps in this WHO analysis, such as two studies deemed by Lawrie to have a high risk of bias being rostered by the WHO team to have a low-toned jeopardy of bias.( In the interrogation, she explains why she considers them to have a high risk of bias .)

What’s more, in the WHO’s summary of observes, they abruptly include data from seven studies, which compounded show an 81% reduction in extinctions. The confidence interval is also astonishingly high-pitched, with a 64% reduced by demises on the low extremity, and 91% on the high end.

What’s more, their absolute effect appraisal for standard of care is 70 deaths per 1,000, comparison with just 14 deaths per 1,000 when analyse with ivermectin. That’s a reduction in deaths of 56 per 1,000 when using ivermectin. The confidence interval is between 44 and 63 fewer deaths per 1,000.

Despite that, the WHO refuses to recommend this stimulant for COVID-1 9. Rabindra Abeyasinghe, a WHO representative to the Philippines, commented that using ivermectin without “strong” evidence is “harmful” because it can give “false confidence” to the public. 11

As noted by Daniel Horowitz in an April 1, 2021, section in The Blaze, 12 “That sure voices a great deal like telling people if they wear a mask indoors, they won’t get COVID. Tragically, when they inevitably do get the virus, the world-wide health nobilities "ve got nothing" to treat them with.”

Doctors Urge Acceptance of Ivermectin to Save Lives

As mentioned earlier, in the U.S ., the FLCCC has also been calling for widespread adoption of ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the medicine of all phases of COVID-1 9.13, 14

FLCCC president Dr. Pierre Kory, onetime prof of medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has testified to the benefits of ivermectin before a number of COVID-1 9 boards, including the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in December 2020,15 and the National Institutes of Health COVID-1 9 Treatment Guidelines Panel January 6, 2021.16 As noted by the FLCCC: 17

“The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-1 9, to keep those with early manifestations from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover.

Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin is effectively a' miracle drug’ against COVID-1 9 and called upon the government’s medical arbiters ... to urgently re-examine the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician auxiliaries to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-1 918 ...

... innumerable clinical studies -- including peer-reviewed randomized seen inquiries -- registered gigantic magnitude benefits of Ivermectin in prophylaxis, early care and also in late-stage disease. Taken together ... dozens of clinical ordeals that have now emerged from around the world are substantial enough to reliably assesses clinical efficacy.

... data regarding 18 randomized ensure tests that included over 2,100 patients ... demonstrated that Ivermectin displays faster viral authorization, faster time to hospital discharge, faster is necessary to clinical improvement, and a 75% reduction in mortality rates.”1 9

A one-page summary2 0 of the clinical trial evidence for Ivermectin can be downloaded from the FLCCC website. A more comprehensive, 31 -page review2 1 of trials data has been issued in the periodical Frontiers of Pharmacology.

At the time of this writing, the number of trials involving ivermectin has risen to 55, including 28 randomized assured contests. A listing of all the Ivermectin experiments done to date, with links to the published studies, can be found on c1 9Ivermectin. com. 22

The FLCCC’s COVID-1 9 protocol was first dubbed MATH +( an acronym based on the key components of the medication ), but after various tweaks and modernizes, the prophylaxis and early outpatient medication protocol is now known as I-MASK +23 while the hospital treatment has been renamed I-MATH +, 24 due to the addition of ivermectin.

The two protocols2 5,26 are available for download on the FLCCC Alliance website in variou usages. The clinical and scientific the reasons for the I-MATH+ infirmary etiquette has also been peer-reviewed and being issued in the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine2 7 in mid-December 2020.

NIH Loosens Restrictions, FDA Warns Against Prophylactic Use

In mid-January 2021, the NIH did rewrite its guidelines on ivermectin, in big percentage thanks to the data presented by Kory and others. However, while the NIH no longer warns against its operation, they too is not outright recommends the following, and they did not grant ivermectin emergency utilize authorization.

As a answer, countless patients in the U.S. still struggle to access the drug, as countless physicians are unwilling to prescribe it off-label against health officials’ recommendations.

At this momentous occasion, we must therefore choose, will we continue to be held ransom by corrupt administrations, health authorities, Big Pharma and billionaire sociopaths, or will we do our moral and professional duty to do no harm and ever do the best for those in our upkeep? The latter includes urgently are to achieve collaborators around the world to discuss which of our tried and tested, safe, older remedies can be used against COVID.~ Dr. Tess Lawrie

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has adopted an even less favorable stance, March 9, 2021 actually issuing a consumer warning March 5, 2021, to not use ivermectin as a prophylactic. 28 The FDA also has not approved ivermectin for prevention of or medicine for SARS-CoV-2. 29

The International Ivermectin for COVID Conference

April 24 through 25, 2021, Lawrie hosted the first International Ivermectin for COVID Conference online. 30 Twelve medical experts3 1 from around the world shared their knowledge during this conference, remembering mechanism of act, protocols for prevention and treatment, including so-called long-hauler syndrome, research findings and real world data.

All of the lecturings, which were recorded via Zoom, can be viewed on Bird-Group.org. 32 In her closing address, Lawrie territory: 33

"The story of Ivermectin has highlighted that we are at a remarkable moment in medical history. The implements that we use to heal and our communication with our patients are being systematically undermined by relentless disinformation stemming from corporate greed.

The story of Ivermectin shows that we as a public have misplaced our trust in the authorities and have underestimated the extent to which money and power corrupts.

Had Ivermectin being were engaged in 2020 when medical collaborators around the world first notified the authorities to its efficacy, millions of lives could have been saved, and the pandemic with all its affiliated suffering and loss introduce into a rapid and timely end.

Since then, hundreds of millions of beings have been involved in the largest medical venture in human history. Mass vaccination was an unproven novel therapy. Hundreds of billions will be made by Big Pharma and paid for by the public.

With politicians and other nonmedical types prescribing to us what we are allowed to prescribe to the ill, we as physicians, have been put in a position such that our ability to uphold the Hippocratic oath is under attack.

At this momentous point, we must therefore choose, will we continue to be held ransom by tainted bands, health authorities, Big Pharma, and billionaire sociopaths, or will we do our moral and professional duty to do no harm and ever do the best for those in our upkeep?

The latter includes urgently are to achieve collaborators around the world to discuss which of our tried and researched safe older prescriptions can be used against COVID.”

During the conference, Lawrie proposed that physicians around the world join together to constitute a new people-centered World Health Organization. "Never before has our persona as physicians been so important because never before have we become complicit in cause so much harm, ” she said.

Read more: articles.mercola.com


From elements to engagement: how to use storytelling for effective business communication

Launched in 2012, YourStory's Book Review region features over 315 claims on imagination, invention, entrepreneurship, and digital transformation. See too our pertained pillars The Turning Point ,~ ATAGEND Techie Tuesdays , and Storybites .

Frameworks, samples, and tips for business communication are effectively presented in the book, What's Your Story? The Essential Business Storytelling Handbook by Adri Bruckner, Anjana Menon, and Marybeth Sandell.

Storytelling is for everyone in the business world- masters, managers, purveyors, auctions crews, columnists, and reporters, the authors begin.

Now based in Barcelona, Adri Bruckner is a inventive communications professional with event in journalism and PR. Anjana Menon is founder-editor of Mint and runs content programme consultancy Content Pixies. Marybeth Sandell is co-author of Introduction to Data Visualisation and Storytelling.

Here are my key takeaways from the 280 -page book, summarised as well in the table below. See also my its consideration of the related works Once Upon an Innovation ,~ ATAGEND Story 10 X ,~ ATAGEND Five Stars ,~ ATAGEND Let the Story Do the Work ,~ ATAGEND Stories for Work ,~ ATAGEND Stories at Work , and Data Story .

Entrepreneurs was necessary to check out YourStory’s Changemaker Story Canvas , a free visualisation tool for startups and trailblazers, and Pitch Tips for Startups .

The 16 sections in the book are packed with good( and bad) examples of storytelling in practice in the corporate and startup worlds; there are activities and employs as well. Though a number of online resources are referenced, there is surprisingly no bibliography of related notebooks, or an index.

TI. Elements

“Every good story is about a person, or people, with a quagmire or menace they are able to overcome, use knowledge, unity and determination, ” the authors describe. It throws "the consumers " in the centre, and not only a commodity or feature.

The message of the tale should give the company’s mission. For instance, the World Wildlife Fund’s mission is to conserve nature; specific messaging has been about expeditions like donations to save koalas. The narrative should prepared a point of view, and justify what’s in it for the customer.

Stories should have killer headlines. “A headline that snoozes, loses, ” the authors warn. Headlines should have verbs, be simple, and grasp attending- without being clickbait. They should rank most in search engines makes as well.

A handy acronym regarding this matter is TACT- experience, attractiveness, precision, and truth. Headline generator implements are offered by companionships like Portent and Hubspot.

After the headline, a good guide can tempt the reader to read on by adding credibility( data) and a human tone( quotes ). Short-lived questions can arouse interest as well. The columnists give result examples of an anecdote, literary or racial note, pierce, and contrast.


Visuals help make a message compelling, believable, understandable, and authoritative- they can increase the likelihood of the letter being shared further as well. “We’ve been connected to epitomes for more than 30,000 years, but writing didn’t begin until around 3,000 BC, ” the authors explain, strengthening the communicative power of images.

“The first picture was taken about 175 several years ago, ” they supplement. It is a good pattern to have an archive of searchable and labeled personas and videos, and include captions and in-figure names when is set out in stories. A number of tools are available to create infographics, graphs, timelines, maps, and Venn sketches.

“Data adds accuracy to your narrative while attaining it most compelling and credible, ” the authors emphasise. “Data assistances register changes, the progress and comparisons, ” they add.

The compounding of data, visuals and narrative can be quite compelling, with elements of logic, design and feelings.

At the same time, attention should be taken to avoid data overload. “Select one main crowd to anchor your floor, ” the authors advise. The rest can sound last-minute in a table or anatomy. Tools like TheCalculatorSite.com assistance contextualise very large numbers.


[ Sustainability Agenda] This eco-friendly Chennai startup sells over 1 lakh bamboo toothbrushes in a quarter

The columnists caution against fake news and manipulation, and caution books to check which organisation has paid for research cited in the news.

The writers likewise indicate standing away from too much jargon, which they group into three forms: corporate( eg. right-sizing, synergy ), consultant( eg. low-hanging fruit, bandwidth, directionalise ), and cultural( nuances specific to a nation ).

“People want to hear storeys about people. Their fights, their feats, hopes and dreams, gaffes, and successes, ” the authors affirm. “Stories procreate associates, empathy and trust between parties, ” they add.

Corporate stories should show compassion, empathy and has pledged to motives, particularly for younger publics. A full-length interview itself can make for a good story, eg. based on procedures like the Proust questionnaire.

CSR legends can be particularly effective, by foreground responsible rules of the company and its employees. The authors quote IKEA and ING as legend instances in this regard.

2II. Channels

The scribes describe mass media views from the macro rank( owned, geographical reach) and micro stage( word overflow, newsroom characters ). They give a range of engagement tips for pitching legends, eg. nurture their interaction with reporters, give time-sensitive exclusivity.

Social media has democratised knack, while also being a loud and horded home, the authors observe. They cite Red Bull as an effective multi-platform storytelling brand.

The writers map out social media demographics by category, eg. Facebook( older contemporaries ), Instagram( young adults) and Snapchat( teens ). LinkedIn’s top countries are the US, India and China. YouTube is the second-most-used search engine after Google, and the go-to place for recreation and educational videos.

Some social media business have been involved by quarrels( eg. Facebook ), so the authors advise firstly checking if this may create mistrust and adversely affect brand image. "Theres been" polarisation on programmes like Twitter.

“The shiniest brand-new tool still won’t make up for a narration badly told, ” the authors caution. Engagement via social media necessary having an open culture and being adroit in responding to potential backlash.


[ Product Roadmap] Using tech, how Khatabook realise incremental shifts in its produce to touch 10 million useds

Stories and words can be amplified via influencers, and community forums like Reddit and Quora. The scribes cite Mumsnet as an efficient open forum for the parenting community.

“Podcasting, corporate videos and vlogging can be done alone but often necessitate the assistance of experts, ” the authors observe, though many patterns from home studios likewise bristled. GIFs have become popular on social media as well. GE, eBay and Unilever have effectively used podcasts.

Sponsored content, advertorials, and sponsored experiment can be used for storytelling and messaging as well. But the authors caution about ethical issues like conflict of interest by the media for paid and partnered content.

Platforms like Outbrain, Sharethrough, and Taboola offer targeted rationing for advertorials. SAP has built credibility for SAP Revelation essays written by in-house professionals, and Patagonia has strong messaging on its website about environmental activism.

3III. Application and integration

The last-place part of the book ties together these components and canals of storytelling, in specific contexts like captain floors, crisis management, public speaking, and company reports.

The chapter on manager legends is outstanding, with valuable tips-off and instances. The leader’s personality and storey should align with the overall firebrand, connect with publics, and be authentic.

Examples from IBM, Walmart and GM are cited, as well as Richard Branson, Warren Buffet, and Oprah Winfrey. In some occurrences, catchy mentions too fit the leaders’ public personalities, and the persona or tone can be adjusted for different channels and audiences.

“Creating a personal brand fails somewhere between a scientific and an artistry, ” the authors affirm. It makes frequent review and recalibration as well.

Communicating during a crisis calls for being “honest, forthcoming, straightforward, and sensitive.” Response teams, exercise, templates, and situation projecting are key here. Not scheming well for a crisis can lead to damage to brand, public safety and financial insurance, the authors caution.


The 5' Ts’ of crisis communication: how to tackle and learn lessons from junctures

They cite bad examples of crisis management( BP during the 2010 lubricant flood; Union Carbide and the 1984 Bhopal gas leak) and good ones( Johnson& Johnson and the 1982 Tylenol crisis; KFC during the 2018 chicken scarcity; Starbucks and sense training in 2018; New Zealand PM during the 2020 pandemic ).

Depending on gathering size, public speaking can be effective if the speaker is comfortable in the character, an expert in the topic, and can direct audience questions. Degree floors can vary in format, from missile drawn attention to predominantly likeness. The writers caution that webinar fatigue is setting in for online occurrences, hence messaging should be smart or immersive.

Company reports need not be dull and difficult to read- storytelling and intend can be effectively integrated now as well. Examples include human interest narratives and suit studies, featuring customers and employees.

“Design is a memorable non-verbal storytelling boost, ” the authors explain. Examples include Austria Solar( report could be read only when the special pages were exposed to sunlight ), and O’Right( report deals reproduced on recycled bamboo and plastic ).

4The road ahead

The final chapter homes future vogues such as experiential material via help of AR( Pokemon Go) and VR( eg. IKEA, Qantas, BBC, Barcelona Water, National Highway Safety ).

The power of the crowd for content generation has been effectively used in marketing by Apple (' Shot on iPhone’ ), IKEA (' At Mine’ ), and Starbucks( White Cup Contest for decoration ). Procedures like gamification have been used by Tata NX Zero Sugar( guess amount of carbohydrate in daily alcohols ).

The book outcomes rather unexpectedly with this chapter; an epilogue with updated information about storytelling in the pandemic period and beyond, or use of the book for training workshops, would have been a welcome addition, for example. Still, the book equips a beneficial single-volume steer to a wide spectrum of business communication and storytelling.

YourStory has also published the billfold' Proverbs and Quotes for Entrepreneurs: A World of Inspiration for Startups’ as a artistic and motivational template for trailblazers( downloadable as apps here: Apple ,~ ATAGEND Android ).

YourStory’s flagship startup-tech and leadership meeting will be restored virtually for its 13 th edition on October 25 -3 0, 2021. Sign up for updates on TechSparks or to express your interest in partnerships and speaker opportunities here.

For more on TechSparks 2021, click here.

Applications are opened for Tech3 0 2021, a register of 30 most promising tech startups from India. Apply or nominate an early-stage startup to become a Tech3 0 2021 startup here.

Edited by Teja Lele Desai

Read more: yourstory.com


Should Unvaccinated People Be Put on No-Fly List?

In June 2021, the U.S. National Security Council secreted a brand-new “National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism” document. 1 While it’s being mainly formulated as a tool to fight White supremacy and political bigotry, the definition of what constitutes a “domestic terrorist” is incredibly vague and based on creeds rather than specific behaviors.

It’s not difficult to imagine this policy being used to silence political foe simply by labeling anyone who disagrees with the government as a domestic terrorist and billing them with a hate crime.

We’re previously verifying signs suggesting that this is the path we’re on. July 28, 2021, Dr. Peter Hotez published a paper2 in PLOS Biology titled “Mounting Antiscience Aggression in the United Commonwealth, ” in which he suggests praising Dr. Anthony Fauci and other scientists has to be labeled a “hate crime.” Commenting on the working paper, Paul Joseph Watson at Summit News writes: 3

“This is yet another transparent effort to dehumanize anti-lockdown demonstrators and demonize people who purely want to exercise bodily autonomy while elevating Fauci and his ilk to Pope-like status. Science isn’t supposed to be a religious creed that is set in stone, it’s an ever-evolving knowledge base that changes and improves thanks to dissent and skepticism.”

Science Depends on Questioning and Challenging Presumption

Attorney Jonathan Turley also responded to Hotez’s paper in an August 4, 2021, blog pole, saying: 4

“’Religion is a culture of religion; discipline is a culture of doubt.’ Feynman’s statement captivates how science depends upon constant question and difficult of presumptions ...

[ T] now remain important debates over not just the underlying science relation to Covid-1 9 but the implications for such science for public policies. Criminalizing the various aspects of that debate would ratchet up the threats against those with dissenting ends, including scientists. That would damage not just free speech but discipline in the long run.”

Should We Have Protected Years That Cannot Be Questioned?

Turley likewise notes how obliging scientists a protected class( and one would assume only those with specific political tilteds) is a slippery slope that will likely have inconvenient forks: 5

“The federal hate crime principles focus on basis of a person’s characteristics of race, belief, ethnicity, tribe, gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity. We have visualized calls for adding professings like police officer, which I likewise defended.

As with police officer, the inclusion of such professings would have a direct and inimical impact on free speech in national societies. Indeed, it would create a slippery slope as other professings requirement inclusion from reporters to diplomats to physicians. Hate crimes would speedily apply to a wide array of beings due to their occupations.”

Will America Accept No-Fly List for Unvaccinated?

Writing for The Atlantic, 6 onetime auxiliary secretary for Homeland Security Juliette Kayyem posits that people who do not want to be part of the COVID injection experiment “need to bear the burden” when it comes to preventing the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

“The number of COVID-1 9 subjects deters proliferating, even if they are outstandingly safe, effective vaccines are widely available, ” Kayyem writes. 7 “Many public organizations are responding by reimposing masking rules on everyone.

But at the present stage of the pandemic, tougher universal limiteds are not the solution to continuing viral spread. While flying, inoculated beings should no longer carry the burden for unvaccinated beings.

The White House has repudiated a nationwide inoculation edict ... but a no-fly list for unvaccinated adults is an self-evident stair that the federal government should take.

It will help limit the risk of transmission at destinations where unvaccinated beings excursion -- and, by establishing standards that restrict specific advantages to vaccinated parties, will too cure raise the stagnant vaccination rates that are maintaining both the economy and society from perfectly recovering.”

Travel Ban Identified as Effective Coercion Strategy

According to Kayyem, traveling in general and flying in particular is not a human right, and putting unvaccinated mortals on a no-fly list is a matter of national protection, in the sense that the country needs to protect itself from parties capable of spreading this dangerous virus.

She makes no mention of the scientifically proved reality that no one is of the COVID shots actually prevent you from getting infected, and that “vaccinated” mortals carry the same viral quantity as the unvaccinated, 8,9 which means they’re just as infectious. The main difference is that injected men might not realize that they’re carriers, as the primary impact when the injections do work is lessening manifestations of infection.

Kayyem likewise cites a New York Times and Kaiser Family Foundation poll in which 41% of unvaccinated respondents had said prohibition on airline wandering would sway its final decision, including 11% of those “adamantly opposed” to vaccination. In other commands, where free doughnuts and million-dollar lotteries have failed to coerce people to get the shot, an airline circulate boycott might do the trick.

Despite her onetime posture within government, she makes no mention of laws forbidding coercion of medical volunteers, such as the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 45 CFR 46( subpart A, the Belmont report ), 10 the Covenant on civil and political rights on Civil and Political Rights treaty, 11 the Declaration of Helsinki1 2 or the Nuremberg Code. 13 Supreme court rulings have also clarified that Americans have the right to choose their own health care in general. 14,15

Reframing to Confuse the Issue

Kayyem hints circumventing such basic human rights by reframing the question. She writes: 16

“The public debate about drawing vaccination a precondition for travel, employ, and other activities has described this approach as inoculation authorizations, a expression that ... suggests that unvaccinated parties are being sought around arbitrarily.

What is actually going on, chiefly, is that institutions are altering responsibilities to unvaccinated beings ... rather than imposing greater burdens on everyone.

Americans still have a choice to go unvaccinated, but that planneds giving up on sure-fire societal benefits. Nobody has a constitutional freedom to attend The Lion King on Broadway or work at Disney or Walmart ... People who still want to wait and see about the vaccines can continue doing so. They exactly can’t restrain pushing all the costs on everyone else.”

As pointed out by Swift Headline, 17 the owner of Atlantic magazine, Laurene Powell Jobs, the billionaire widow of Steve Jobs, owns two private jets herself, devoting her the freedom of the media to fly around the world at will, regardless what vaccine mandates might be in place. Many other ultra-rich beings would also be able to ignore the rules due to wealth alone, virtually turning them into a protected class. Swift Headline points out this projection: 18

“The Atlantic went on to say unvaccinated people who are exercising their individual privileges as free Americans' do not deserve’ to be a' protected class’ ...

Jobs’s wealth and class status is detailed in Breitbart News’ Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow’s book,' Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Decay, ’ which' exposures the obscured connections between the establishment media and the activist left.’

As Marlow details, Jobs’s past is a privileged one ... Jobs' married shaft and inherited a good deal of money, and her capital is tied together in some of world’s biggest companionships, ’ Marlow continues.' She is the establishment.’”

The Price of Admission to Society

August 2, 2021, the San Francisco Chronicle also published an belief piece1 9 by the Chronicle editorial board, in which they advocated we ought to “Make vaccination the price of admission to society.” One course to evaluate the reasonableness of such a hypothesi is to replace COVID “vaccination” with anything else. How about: “Make proof of contraception use the price of admission to prohibits and nightclubs.”

“Make clear skin the price of admission to gyms and public swimming pools.” “Make being taller than 5’ 9” the price of admission to theme parks.” “Make having a BMI below 25 the price of admission to airline flights.” “Make proof of not having an illness the price of admission to in-hospital care.”

According to the Chronicle editorial board, “the unvaccinated account for over 95% of hospitalizations and deaths.”2 0 The council is not quote where it got that data from, so let’s review the source of that data.

In an August 5, 2021, video account, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky noted that this statistic was obtained by looking at hospitalization and death data from January through June 2021 -- a timeframe during which the vast majority of the United Government population were unvaccinated.

The narrative that we’re in a' pandemic of the unvaccinated’ was created by exploiting statistics from a time period when the U.S. as a whole was largely unvaccinated. When you look at more recent data, present trends is swaying in the opposite direction.

January 1, 2021, merely 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had received one or more shots, 21 and as of June 15, 48.7% have been completely “vaccinated.”2 2

The CDC has also pointed out that you are not considered “fully vaccinated” until two weeks after your second dose( in the case of Pfizer or Moderna ), which is given six weeks after your firstly shot. 23 This meant that if you receive your first dose on June 1, you won’t be “fully vaccinated” until eight weeks later, around August 1.

So, the narrative that we’re in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” was created by exerting statistics from a time period when the U.S. as a whole was largely unvaccinated. When you look at more recent data, present trends is swinging in the opposite direction.

Vaccinated Now Comprise the Bulk of Hospitalizations

For example, August 1, 2021, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, chairman of Israel’s Public Health Work, announced half of all COVID-1 9 illness were among the fully injected. 24

A few days later, August 5, Dr. Kobi Haviv, chairman of the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that 95% of severely ill COVID-1 9 patients are perfectly inoculated, and that they make up 85% to 90% of COVID relevant hospitalizations overall. 25

In Scotland, official data on hospitalizations and demises testify 87% of those who have died from COVID-1 9 in the third wave that began in early July were inoculated, 26 and in Gibraltar, which has a 99% COVID jab compliance rate, COVID clients have risen by 2,500% since June 1, 2021.27

A CDC investigation of an outbreak in Barnstable County, Massachusetts between July 6 through July 25, 2021, learnt 74% of those who received a diagnosis of COVID1 9, and 80% of hospitalizations, were among the amply inoculated. 28,29 Most, but not all, had the Delta variant.

“What the breakthrough cases appear to show is that the delta variant of the coronavirus is more easily carried and transmitted by injected people than its predecessors, ” the Chronicle editorial board writes. 30

“In any case, the greater apparent transmissibility of the variant builds it that much more important to protect as many parties as is practicable from severe COVID by increasing inoculation rates.”

What the board appears to be saying is that unvaccinated people must be protected against severe infection, against their will, if need be, and the most efficient way to do that is to discriminate against them and treat them like second-class citizens.

Again, a simple way to check the reasonableness of this argument is to swap out the COVID reference for something else. How about, “It’s important to protect as numerous people as possible from dying in automobile collisions by fostering vehicle tolls so fewer people can get behind the wheel.”

Can' Big Brother’ Save You From a Virus?

As early as April 2020, The Times in the U.K. weighed in with similar suggestions, territory “We need Big Brother to beat this virus.”3 1 Clare Foges, the author of the piece in question, went on to say, “Don’t make the political liberty foyer blind us given the fact that greater position surveillance, including ID cards, is required.”

The argument that Big Brother can protect us from infection is outlandish on its face, because no extent of parties surveillance can avoid microscopic viruses from circulating.

The No. 1 region of viral spread is in institutions, such as nursing homes and infirmaries, more the staff within them are among the most well-trained in pathogenic controller. If drilled hospital faculty can’t prevent the spread of viruses, how can government officials do it?

Importantly, the reason that we need vaccine passports to prove we’re “clean” enough to participate in society immediately falls apart when you take into account the fact that the COVID shots do not provide immunity. You can still be infected, carry the virus and spread it to others.

We’ve already seen various examples of situations where 100% of beings were fully “vaccinated” against COVID-1 9 hitherto an eruption appeared. We’ve even considered over 100 amply COVID introduced parties die from COVID in one state alone, Massachusetts, 32 so it is likely there are now many thousands of perfectly “vaccinated” who have died from COVID.

Even a 100% Vaccination Rate Cannot Eliminate COVID

Most recently, Carnival cruise words experienced an eruption despite every last person on that ship having proof of COVID “vaccination.”3 3 The cruise liner had even intentionally shortened ability from 4,000 to 2,800 to provide ample social distancing capability. None of the measures acted. People got sick anyway, which obligates perfect gumption if you be reminded that the shot doesn’t provide immunity, merely symptom reduction.

Cases such as these clearly reveal that even if everyone gets the shot, SARS-CoV-2 will mutate and continue to circulate, taking beings out here and there. To think that giving up basic rights and naturalness are responding simply isn’t logical. Taking responsibility for your own health is, and that includes deciding if and how you want to protect yourself from SARS-CoV-2.

Not everyone is deathly afraid of COVID-1 9. Many realize there are safe and effective treatments available, such as the Front Line COVID-1 9 Critical Care Alliance’s I-MASS Prevention and At-Home Treatment protocol and I-MASK+ Early Outpatient Treatment protocol.

Nebulized hydrogen peroxide can also be used for prevention and treatment of COVID-1 9, as detailed in Dr. David Brownstein’s case paper3 4 and Dr. Thomas Levy’s free e-book, “Rapid Virus Recovery.” And if there’s effective treatment, there’s little need to risk permanent side effects from an experimental gene technology that can only ply a shrink wander of protection in the first place.

Read more: articles.mercola.com


A ‘Leap’ Toward Humanity’s Destruction

Wellcome leap

This article primarily appeared on Unlimited Hangout.

The world’s richest medical investigate footing, the Wellcome Trust, has teamed up with a pair of onetime DARPA leads who improved Silicon Valley’s skunkworks to usher in an age of nightmarish surveillance, including for children older and younger as 3 month age-old. Their agenda can only advance if we allow it.

A UK nonprofit with ties to world-wide decay throughout the COVID-1 9 crisis as well as historical and current ties to the UK eugenics action launched a global health-focused DARPA equivalent last year. The move travelled largely unnoticed by both mainstream and independent media.

The Wellcome Trust, which has arguably been second only to Bill Gates in its ability to influence contests during the COVID-1 9 crisis and vaccination campaign, launched its own world-wide equivalent of the Pentagon's reticent investigate agency last year, officially to combat the "most pressing health challenges of our time."

Though first envisioned of in 2018, this particular Wellcome Trust initiative was spun off from the Trust last-place May with $300 million in initial fund. It promptly captivated two onetime DARPA executives, who had previously served in the upper echelons of Silicon Valley, to manage and plan its portfolio of projects.

This world-wide health DARPA, known as Wellcome Leap, seeks to achieve "breakthrough scientific and technological solutions" by or before 2030, with a focus on "complex world health challenges." The Wellcome Trust is open about how Wellcome Leap will apply the approaches of Silicon Valley and venture capital firms to the health and life science sector.

Unsurprisingly, their three current programs are poised to develop incredibly invasive tech-focused, and in a number of cases overtly transhumanist, medical engineerings, including a program alone focused on using artificial intelligence( AI ), portable sensors, and wearable brain-mapping tech "for childrens" 3 years old and younger.

This Unlimited Hangout investigation explores not only the four current programs of Wellcome Leap but likewise the person or persons behind it. The arising representation is of an fantastically malevolent assignment that poses not only a great threat to current culture but to the future of humanity itself. An upcoming Unlimited Hangout investigation will examine the history of the Wellcome Trust along with its role in recent and current events.

Leap's Leadership: Merging Man and Machine for the Military and Silicon Valley

The intentions of the Wellcome Leap are made clear by the woman chosen to lead it, onetime chairman of the Pentagon's DARPA, Regina Dugan. Dugan began her occupation at DARPA in 1996; she passed a counterterrorism task force in 1999 before leaving DARPA about a year later.

After departing DARPA, she cofounded her own venture capital firm, Dugan Ventures, and then became special adviser to the US Army's vice chief of staff from 2001 to 2003, which coincides with the attacks of Afghanistan and Iraq. In 2005, she developed a defense-focused tech conglomerate announced RedXDefense, which contracts with the military and specifically for DARPA.

In 2009, under the Obama administration, Dugan was appointed director of DARPA by Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Much was compiled over her being the first girl chairman of relevant agencies, but she is best remembered at relevant agencies for her so-called "Special Forces" approach to invention. During her term, she created DARPA's now defunct Transformational Convergence Technology Office, which focused on social networks, synthetic biology, and machine intelligence.

Many of the topics previously to be organized by that bureau are now overseen by DARPA's Biological Technology Office, which was created in 2014 and focuses on everything "from programmable microbes to human-machine symbiosis." The Biological Technologies Office, like Wellcome Leap, engages a mixture of "health-focused" biotechnology programs and transhumanist endeavors.

Right before leaving the top capacity at DARPA, Dugan greenlighted the agency's initial investments in mRNA vaccine technology, which led to DARPA's investments in Pfizer and Moderna shortly after. The DARPA scientist who lobbied Dugan to back the program, Dan Wattendorf , now labor as the director of Innovative Technology Solutions at the Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation.

While Dugan's efforts at DARPA are recollected lovingly by those in the national-security state, and also by those working in Silicon Valley, Dugan was investigated for conflicts of interest during her experience as DARPA's director, as her conglomerate RedXDefense acquired millions in Department of Defense contracts during her tenure.

Though she had recused herself from any formal role at the company while heading DARPA, she continued to hold a significant financial stake in the company, and a military investigation later discovered she had infringed moralities rules to a significant degree.

Instead of being held accountable in any way, Dugan went on to become a top executive at Google, where she was brought on to manage Google's Advanced Technology and Product Group( ATAP ), which it had spun out of Motorola Mobility after Google's acquisition of that company in 2012. Google's ATAP was modeled after DARPA and filled other ex-DARPA officials besides Dugan.

At Google, Dugan oversaw various programmes, including what is now the basis of Google's "augmented reality" business, then known as Project Tango, as well as "smart" clothing in which multitouch sensors were knitted into textiles. Another projection that Dugan produced involved the purpose of applying a "digital tattoo" to unlock smartphones. Perhaps most controversially, Dugan was also behind the process of drafting a "digital authentication pill."

According to Dugan, when the pill is immersed, "your entire body becomes your authentication token." Dugan made the pill and many of her other efforts at Google as working to fix "the mechanical mismatch between humans and electronics" by making engineering that mixes the human body with machines to going degrees.

While serving in this capacity at Google, Dugan chaired a committee at the 2013 Clinton Global Initiative called "Game-Changers in Technology" and attended the 2015 Bilderberg meeting where AI was a primary topic of discussion.

In 2016, Dugan left Google for Facebook where she was chosen to be the first head of Facebook's own DARP-Aequivalent research agency, then known as Building 8. DARPA's ties to the beginnings of Facebook were discussed in a recent Unlimited Hangout report.

Under Dugan, Building 8 invested heavily in brain-machine interface technology, which has since produced the company's "neural wearable" wristbands that claim to be able to anticipate movements of the handwriting and digits from mentality signals alone. Facebook showcased prototypes of the project earlier this year.

Dugan left Facebook precisely eighteen months after joining Building 8, announcing her projects "to focus on building and contributing a brand-new endeavor, " which was apparently a have referred to Wellcome Leap. Dugan later said it was as if she had been training courses for her persona at Wellcome Leap ever since participate the workforce, making it as the spire of her career.

When invited in an interview earlier this year who the customer of Wellcome Leap are, Dugan dedicated a long-winded answer but basically responded that the project suffices the biotech and pharmaceutical industries, international organizations such as the UN, and public-private partnerships.

In addition to her persona at Wellcome, Dugan is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations-sponsored taskforce on US Technology and Innovation policy, which was formed in 2019. Other members include LinkedIn's Reid Hoffman, McKinsey Institute Global Chairman James Manyika, onetime head of Google Eric Schmidt and President Biden's controversial top discipline consultant Eric Lander.

The other exec at Wellcome Leap, chief operating officer Ken Gabriel, has a background closely tied to Dugan's. Gabriel, like Dugan, is a former planned manager at DARPA, where he produced the agency's microelectromechanical organizations( MEMS) investigate from 1992 to 1996.

He served as deputy managing director of DARPA from 1995 to 1996 and became head of the Electronics Technology Office from 1996 to 1997, where he was reportedly responsible for about half of all federal electronics-technology assets. At DARPA, Gabriel worked closely with the FBI and the CIA.

Ken Gabriel Ken Gabriel- COO of Wellcome Leap. Source: Wellcome Leap

Gabriel left DARPA for Carnegie Mellon University, where he was in charge of the Office for Security Technologies in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. That power was created after 9/11 precisely to help meet the national-security needs of the federal government departments, according to Carnegie Mellon's announcement of the program.

Around that same time, Gabriel became regarded as "the architect of the MEMS industry" due to his past work at DARPA and his founding of the MEMS-focused semiconductor company Akustica in 2002. He acted as Akustica's chairman and chief technology officer until 2009, at which epoch he returned to work at DARPA where he dished as the agency's deputy director, running instantly under Regina Dugan.

In 2012, Gabriel followed Dugan to Google's Advanced Technology and Product Group, which he was actually responsible for creating. According to Gabriel, Google cofounders Larry Page and Sergey Brin assignment Gabriel with creating "a private sector ground-up model of DARPA" out of Motorola Mobility. Regina Dugan was placed in charge, and Gabriel again performed as her deputy.

In 2013, Dugan and Gabriel co-wrote a piece for the Harvard Business Review about how DARPA's "Special Forces" innovation approach could revolutionize both both the public and private sectors if more widely applied.

Gabriel left Google in 2014, well before Dugan, to serve as the president and CEO of Charles Stark Draper Laboratories, better known as Draper Labs, which develops "innovative technology solutions" for the national-security community, with a focus on biomedical organisations, vitality, and space technology. Gabriel held that position until he abruptly resigned in 2020 to co-lead Wellcome Leap with Dugan.

In addition to his persona at Wellcome, Gabriel is also a World Economic Forum "technology pioneer" and on the board of directors of Galvani Bioelectronics, a seam venture of GlaxoSmithKline, which is intimately linked to the Wellcome Trust, and the Google affiliate Verily.

Galvani focuses on the development of "bioelectronic medicines" that are related to "implant-based modulation of neural signals" in an overt move by the pharmaceutical industry and Silicon Valley to normalize transhumanist "medicines."

The longtime chairman of the board of Galvani, on which Gabriel dishes, was Moncef Slaoui, who led the US COVID-1 9 inoculation growth and dissemination program Action Warp Speed. Slaoui was relieved of its own position at Galvani this past March over well-substantiated claims of sexual harassment.

Jeremy Farrar, Pandemic Narrative Manager

While Dugan and Gabriel ostensibly guide the organization, Wellcome Leap is the brainchild of Jeremy Farrar and Mike Ferguson, who serve as its leads. Farrar is the director of the Wellcome Trust itself, and Ferguson is agent chair of the Trust's board of governors.

Farrar has been lead of the Wellcome Trust since 2013 and has participates actively in critical decision making at the highest level globally since the beginning of the COVID crisis. He is too an agenda contributor to the World Economic Forum and cochaired the WEF's Africa meeting in 2019.

Farrar's Wellcome Trust is also a WEF strategic partner and cofounded the COVID Action Platform with the WEF. Farrar was more recently behind the creation of Wellcome's COVID-Zero initiative, which is also bind to the WEF.

Farrar has formulated its own initiative as "an opportunity for companies to advance the science which will eventually reduce business disruption." Thus far it has persuaded titans of finance, including Mastercard and Citadel, to invest millions in research and development at makings favored by the Wellcome Trust.

Wellcome Trust Director Jeremy Farrar with NTI Co-Chairman Sam Nunn Wellcome Trust Director Jeremy Farrar with NTI Co-Chairman Sam Nunn, who led the 2001 Dark Winter exercise.

Source: NTI.com

Some of Wellcome's controversial medical-research projects in Africa, as well as its ties to the UK eugenics advance, were investigated in a December article published at Unlimited Hangout.

That report too explores the intimate alliances of Wellcome to the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-1 9 vaccine, the purpose of applying which has now been restricted or banned in several countries. As mentioned in the introduction, the Wellcome Trust itself is the victim of an upcoming Unlimited Hangout investigation( Place 2 ).

Jeremy Farrar, who was born in Singapore in 1961, had previously been conductor of the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit in Ho Chi Minh City, beginning in 1998. During that time, he authored innumerable epidemiological research papers. He claimed in a 2014 Financial Times article that his decision to move to Vietnam was due to his indifference for discussion auditoriums full of lily-white men.

Southeast Asia was obviously a much less adjusted environment for someone in the medical-research industry wishing to indulge in groundbreaking research. Although based in Vietnam, Farrar was sent by Oxford to many locations around the globe to study epidemics happening in real time.

In 2009, when swine influenza was creating disruption in Mexico, Farrar jumped on an aeroplane to dive right into the action, something he too did for subsequent world-wide outbreaks of Ebola, MERS, and avian flu.

Over the past year, many questions have arisen regarding exactly how much power Farrar exercises over world public health policy. Recently, the US president's chief medical adviser, Anthony Fauci, was forced to release his emails and match from March and April 2020 at the request of the Washington Post.

The released emails disclose what appears to be a high-level conspiracy by some of the top medical officials in the US to falsely claim that COVID-1 9 could only have been of zoonotic parentage, despite clues to the contrary. The emails were heavily redacted as such emails frequently are, supposedly to protect the information of the people involved, but the "( b )( 6) " redactions also protect much of Jeremy Farrar's input into these discussions.

Chris Martenson, financial researcher and post-doctorate student of neurotoxicology and founder of Peak Prosperity, has had some insightful observations on the matter, including asking why this protection has been offered to Farrar given that he is the director of a "charitable trust." Martenson went on to question why the Wellcome Trust was involved at all in these high-level discussions.

One Fauci email, dated February 25, 2020, and sent by Amelie Rioux of the WHO, stated that Jeremy Farrar's official persona at that time was "to act as the board's focal point on the COVID-1 9 outbreak, to represent and advise the board on the science of the eruption and the financing of the response."

Farrar had previously chaired the WHO's Scientific Advisory Council. The emails likewise prove the prep, within a ten-day period, of the SARS-CoV-2 "'origins" paper, which was entitled "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2" and was accepted for booklet by Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020.

The paper claimed that the SARS-CoV-2 virus could only have come from natural causes as opposed to gain-of-function research, a claim formerly deemed as truth in the mainstream but which is coming back under appreciable inquiry in recent weeks.

Shaping the presentation of an beginning floor for a virus of global relevance is something Farrar has been involved with before. In 2004-5, it was reported that Farrar and his Vietnamese colleague Tran Tinh Hien, the weaknes lead at the Hospital for Tropical Infection, were the first to identify the re-emergence of the avian influenza( H5N1) in humans.

Farrar has portrayed the start tale on many occasions, territory: "It was a boy. She caught it from a pet duck that just died and she'd dug up and reburied. She survived." Harmonizing to Farrar, its own experience prompted him to found a global network in conjunction with the World Health Organization to "improve regional responses to disease outbreaks."

An article published by Rockefeller University Press's Journal of Experimental Medicine in 2009 is dramatically named, "Jeremy Farrar: When Disaster Strikes." Farrar, when referring to the H5N 1 parentage narration stated: "The WHO people--and this is not a criticism--decided it was unlikely that the child had SARS or avian influenza.

They left, but Professor Hien abode behind to talk with the child and her mum. The girlfriend admitted that she had been quite sad in the previous days with the death of her baby duck. The daughter and her brother had pushed over burying the duck and, because of this argument, she had gone back, excavate up the duck, and reburied it--probably so her friend wouldn't know where it was buried.

With that biography, Professor Hien phoned me at home and said he was worried about the child. He made some swabs from the child's nose and throat and bring them back to the hospital. That night the laboratory ranged research on the samples, and they were positive for Influenza A."

With Farrar now having been uncovered as an instrumental part of the team that crafted the official story regarding the parentages of SARS-CoV-2, his previous assertions about the root of past outbreaks should be scrutinized.

As the director of a "charitable trust, " Jeremy Farrar is almost completely inexplicable for his involvement in crafting contentious narratives related to the COVID crisis. He continues to be at the forefront of the world-wide response to COVID, in part by launching the Wellcome Leap Fund for "unconventional programmes, funded at scale" as an overt attempt to create a global and "charitable" version of DARPA.

Indeed, Farrar, in conceiving Wellcome Leap, has arranged himself to be just as, if not more, instrumental in build the foundation for the post-COVID era as he was in building the foundation for the COVID crisis itself.

This is significant as Wellcome Leap CEO Regina Dugan has labeled COVID-1 9 this generation's "Sputnik moment" that will launch a new age of "health innovation, " much like the launching of Sputnik started a global technological "space age." Wellcome Leap fully intends to lead the pack.

"Rulers" of the Gene-Sequencing Industry

In contrast to the overt DARPA, Silicon Valley, and Wellcome ties-in of the others, the chairman of the board of directors of Wellcome Leap, Jay Flatley, has a different background. Flatley is the long-time head of Illumina, a California-based gene-sequencing hardware and software beings that is believed to currently predominate the field of genomics.

Though he stepped down from the board of Illumina in 2016, he has continued to serve as the executive chairman of its board of directors. Flatley was the first to be chosen for a lead statu at Wellcome Leap, and he was responsible for suggesting Regina Dugan for the organization's chief executive officer, according to a recent interrogation given by Dugan.

Illumina Campus Illumina Campus. Source: Glassdoor

As a profile on Illumina in the business magazine Fast Company records, Illumina "operates behind the scenes, selling hardware and services to companies and research prisons, " among them 23 andMe. 23 andMe's CEO, Anne Wojcicki, the sister of YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki and the spouse of Google cofounder Sergey Brin, told Fast Company, "It's crazy. Illumina is like the ruler of this whole universe and no one knows that."

The report aware of the fact that 23 andMe, like most business that furnish DNA sequencing and analysis to purchasers, utilizations machines produced by Illumina.

In 2016, Illumina propelled an "aggressive" five-year plan to "bring genomics out of research labs and into doctors' offices." Given the current state of things, peculiarly the global pushing toward gene-focused vaccines and rehabilitations, that programme, which concludes this year, could not have been any better timed.

Illumina's current CEO, Francis DeSouza, previously held key posts at Microsoft and Symantec. Also in 2016, Illumina's executive squads calculate a future in which humans are gene measured from birth to grave for both health and commercial purposes.

Whereas most companies have contended financially during the coronavirus pandemic, some have pictured a big an increasing number of profits. Illumina has witnessed its share price double since the start of the COVID crisis.

The company's$ 1 billion plus in revenues during the last tax year was obviously helped by the quick approval of the NovaSEQ 6000 machines, which can test a large number of COVID tests more quickly than other manoeuvres. An man machine has a hefty price tag of roughly$ 1 million, and thus they are mostly found at elite equipment, private labs, and top-tier universities.

Jay Flatley Jay Flatley, Executive Chairman, Illumina, speaking at World Economic Forum in Davos 2018. Source: WEF

In addition to his long-standing leader character at Illumina, Jay Flatley is also a "digital member" of the World Economic Forum as well as the lead independent director of Zymergen, a WEF "tech pioneer" company that is "rethinking biology and reimagining the world."

Flatley, who has also attended several Davos satisfies, has addressed the WEF on the "promise of precision[ i.e ., gene-specific] medicine."

At another WEF panel meeting, Flatley, alongside UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock, promoted the relevant recommendations of building genomic sequencing of newborns at birth the norm, claiming it had "the potential to change the healthcare system from reactive to preventative."

Some at the panel called for the genomic sequencing of babies to eventually become mandatory.

Aside from Flatley as private individuals, Illumina as a company is a WEF partner and plays a key role in its pulpit regarding the future of health care. A top Illumina executive also acts on the WEF's Global Future Council on Biotechnology.


Wellcome Leap currently has four curricula: Multi-Stage Psych, Delta Tissue, 1KD, and HOPE. HOPE was the first program to be announced by Wellcome Leap and stands for Human Organs, Physiology and Engineering. According to the full program description, HOPE strives "to leverage the supremacy of bioengineering to advance stem cells, organoids, and entire part the mechanisms and ties-in that recapitulate human physiology in vitro and regenerate vital gatherings in vivo."

human organs physiology and engineering Source: Wellcome Leap, https :// wellcomeleap.org/ hope /

HOPE consists of two main program destinations. First, it seeks to "bioengineer a multiorgan platform that recreates human immunological responses with sufficient faithfulnes to doubled the predictive appreciate of a preclinical tribulation with respect to efficacy, toxicity and immunogenicity for therapeutic interventions."

In other names, this bioengineered programme mimicking human organs would be used to test the effects of pharmaceutical products, including vaccines, which could create a situation in which animal inquiries shall be substituted for ordeals on gene-edited and raised organs.

Though such an advance would certainly be helpful in the sense of reducing often unethical animal experimentation, trusting such a novel organization to allow medical treatments to go straight to the human-testing phase would also require trusting the institutions developing that system and its funders.

As it stands now, the Wellcome Trust has too many ties to distort actors in the pharmaceutical industry, having initially begun as the "philanthropic" arm of UK drug giant GlaxoSmithKline, for anyone to trust what they are producing without actual independent affirmation, given the histories of some of their partners in fudging both animal and human clinical test data for inoculations and other products.

The second destination of HOPE is to open up the use of machine-human hybrid organs for transplantation into human being. That objective focuses on restoring "organ performs employing grown organs or biological/ synthetic composite systems" with the later goal of bioengineering a fully transplantable human organ after several years.

Later on in the program description, nonetheless, the interest in merging the synthetic and biological becomes clearer when it districts: "The hour is right to foster synergies between organoids, bioengineering and immunoengineering technologies, and breakthrough the state-of-the-art of in vitro human biology ... by building controllable, accessible and scalable systems."

The program description document also notes the interest of Wellcome in genetic-engineering approaches for the "enhancement of wanted owneds and insertion of traceable markers" and Wellcome's ambition to reproduce the building blocks of the human immune system and human organ arrangements through technological means.

Transhumanist Toddlers?

The second program to be pursued by Wellcome Leap is called "The First 1000 Epoches: Promoting Healthy Brain Networks, " which is abbreviated as 1KD by the organization. It is arguably the most unsettling program because it seeks to use young children, specifically infants from three months to three-year-old toddlers, as its test subjects.

The program is being overseen by Holly Baines, who previously acted as programme developing produce for the Wellcome Trust before assembling Wellcome Leap as the 1KD platform leader.

the first 1000 days Source: Wellcome Leap, https :// wellcomeleap.org/ 1kd /

1KD is focused on developing "objective, scalable ways to assess a child's cognitive health" by monitoring the brain development and serve of infants and toddlers, countenancing practitioners to "risk-stratify children" and "predict responses to interventions" for the development of brains.

The program description document notes that, up to this point in biography, "our primary opening into the developing brain has been neuroimaging proficiencies and animal representations, which can help identify quantitative biomarkers of[ neural] structure state and characterise system differences underlying behaviours." It then include an indication that advances in technology "are opening added possibles in young infants."

The program description goes on to say that artificial neural network, a word of AI, "have demonstrated the viability of modelling network pruning process and their purchases of complex behaviours in much the same way as a developing brain, " while improvements in machine learning, another subset of AI, can now be used to extract "meaningful signals" from the brains of newborns and young children.

These algorithms can then be used to develop "interventions" for young children regarded by other algorithms to be in danger of having underdeveloped brain function.

The document goes on to note the promise of "low-cost portable sensors, wearables and home-based systems" in "providing a new opportunity to assess the influence and dependency of brain development on natural physical and social interactions."

In other statements, this program seeks to use "continuous visual and audio recordings in the home" as well as wearable machines on children to collect millions upon millions of data points. Wellcome Leap describes these wearables as "relatively unassuming, scalable electronic medals that rally visual, auditory and flow data as well as interactive peculiarities( such as turn-taking, speeding and reaction times ). "

Elsewhere in the document there is a call to develop "wearable sensors that assess physiological criteria predictive of brain health( e.g ., electrodermal work, rate of respiration, and heart rate) and wireless wearable EEG or eye-tracking technology" for use in infants and children three and under.

Like other Wellcome Leap planneds, this technology is being developed with the intention of starting it mainstream in medical discipline within the next five to ten years, meaning that this system--although made as a direction to monitor children's brain functioning to improve cognitive outcomes--is a recipe for total surveillance of children and very young children as well as a means for altering their brain functioning as algorithms and Leap's programmers see fit.

1DK has two main program aims. The first is to "develop a fully integrated model and quantitive appraisal tools of network developed as the first 1000 periods[ of life-time ], sufficient to predict EF[ ministerial serve] constitution before a child's first birthday."

Such a pose, the specific characteristics speaks, "should predict contributions of nutrition, the microbiome and the genome" on brain shaping as well as the effects of "sensimotor and social interactions[ or shortfall thereof] on structure snipping processes" and EF outcomes. The second purpose makes it clear that widespread adoption of such neurological-monitoring technologies in children and babes is the endgame for 1DK.

It states that the program plans to "create scalable methods for optimising promotion, prevention, screening and therapeutic involvements to improve EF by at least 20% in 80% of children before age 3. "

True to the eugenicist ties of the Wellcome Trust( to be considered more in-depth in Part 2 ), Wellcome Leap's 1DK notes that "of interest are betterments from underdeveloped EF to normative or from normative to well-developed EF across the population to deliver the most significant impact."

One of the goals of 1DK is thus not treating illnes or addressing a "global health world challenge" but instead experimenting on the cognitive augmentation of children use symbolizes developed by AI algorithms and invasive surveillance-based technology.

Another unsettling aspect of the program is its plan to "develop an in vitro 3D intelligence assembloid that mimics the time formation" of a developing brain that is akin to the poses put forward by monitoring the brain development of babes and children.

Later on, the program description calls this an "in-silico" framework of a child's brain, something of obvious interest to transhumanists who identify such a development as a harbinger of the so-called singularity.

Beyond that, it appears that this in-silico and thus synthetic simulate of the intelligence is planned to be used as the "model" to which infant and children brains are influenced by the "therapeutic interventions" mentioned elsewhere in the program description.

It should be clear how malevolent it is that an organization that brings together the worst "mad scientist" motivations of both the NGO and military-research macrocosms is openly planning to conduct such experimentations on the brains of newborns and toddlers, considering them as datasets and their psyches as something to be "pruned" by machine "intelligence."

Allowing such a program to advance unimpeded without pushback from the public would convey granting a perilous schedule targeting society's youngest and most vulnerable members to potentially advancement to a place where it is difficult to stop.

A "Tissue Time Machine"

The third and second-most recent program to join the Wellcome Leap lineup is called Delta Tissue, abbreviated by the organization as DT. Delta Tissue aims to create a platform that observers changes in human-tissue function and interactions in real term, ostensibly to "explain the status of a disease in each person and better predict how that canker would progress."

Referring to this platform as a "tissue time machine, " Wellcome Leap realise Delta Tissue as being able to predict the onslaught of infection before it appears while also allowing for medical interventions that "are targeted to the individual."

delta tissue Source: Wellcome Leap, https :// wellcomeleap.org/ delta-tissue /

Well before the COVID era, accuracy medication or prescription "targeted or accommodated to the individual" has been a code phrase for therapies based on patients' genetic data and/ or for cares that vary nucleic acid( e.g ., DNA and RNA) function itself. For example, the US government defines "precision medicine" as "an rising approach for illnes medicine and prevention that makes into account individual variability in genes, environment, and life-style for each person."

Similarly, a 2018 newspaper published in Technology notes that, in oncology, "precision and personalized medicine ... promotes the development of specialized medicines for each specific subtype of cancer, based on the measurement and manipulation of key patient genetic and omic data( transcriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics, etc .). "

Prior to COVID-1 9 and the inoculation roll out, the mRNA vaccine technology used by the DARP-Afunded firms Moderna and Pfizer were marketed as being precision medicine managements and were largely referred to as "gene regimen" in media reports.

They were also promoted heavily as a progressive technique of treating cancer, forming it unsurprising that the Delta Tissue program at Wellcome Leap would use a similar justification to develop a program that aims to offer tailor-make gene rehabilitations to beings before the onslaught of a disease.

This Delta Tissue pulpit works to combine "the latest cell and material profiling technologies with recent advances in machine learning, " that is, AI.

Given Wellcome Leap's connections to the US armed, it is worth noting that the Pentagon and Google, both onetime employers of Wellcome Leap CEO Regina Dugan and COO Ken Gabriel, work collaboratively since last-place September on using AI to predict disease in humans, first focusing on cancer before expanding to COVID-1 9 and every sicknes in between.

The Delta Tissue planned seemed to have pertained aims, as its program description makes clear that the programme eventually aims to use its pulpit for a multitude of cancers and infectious diseases.

The ultimate goal of this Wellcome Leap planned is "to eradicate the obstinately challenging cankers that case so much suffering around the world." It plans to do this through AI algorithms, nonetheless, which are never 100 percentage accurate in their predictive clevernes, and with gene-editing therapies, nearly all of which are novel and have not been well tested.

That latter point is important given that one of the main methods for gene-editing in humen, CRISPR, has been is located within several studies to cause appreciable damage to the DNA, damage that is largely irreparable( realise here, here and here ).

It seems probable that a person placed on such a hi-tech medical treatment path will continue to need a never-ending series of gene-editing treatments and perhaps other invasive hi-tech medications to mitigate and succeed the consequences of unwieldy gene splicing.

Total Surveillance to Treat "Depression"

Wellcome Leap's most recent program, launched this very week, is called "Multi-Channel Psych: Revealing Mechanisms of Anhedonia" and is officially focused on creating "complex, biological" managements for depression.

multi channel psych Source: Wellcome Leap, https :// wellcomeleap.org/ mcpsych /

Those behind Wellcome Leap frame their own problems they aim to tackle with this program as follows 😛 TAGEND

"We understand that synaptic ties serve as the currency movements neural communication, and that strengthening or dampening these connects can facilitate learning new behavioral approaches and ways and means to looking at the world.

Through studies in both animal sits and humans, we have discovered that emotional states are encoded in complex neural network task motifs, and that instantly changing such patterns via brain stimulation can change climate. We also know that disruption of these delicately offset systems can be achieved through neuropsychiatric illness."( emphasis added)

They add that "biologically located treatments" for dimple "are not being coincided to the biology of the human beings they're being used in, " and, thus, managements for dip need to be tailored "to the specific biology" of individual patients. They clearly state that what needs to be addressed in order to make such personal modifications to treatment is to gain "easy access to the biological substrate of depression--i.e. the brain."

Wellcome Leap's program description notes that this effort will focus specifically on anhedonia, which it defines as "an impairment in the effort-based reward system" and as a "key symptom of sadnes and other neuropsychiatric illnesses." Notably, in the fine print of the document, Wellcome Leap commonwealths 😛 TAGEND

"While there are many definitions of anhedonia, we are less interested in the investigation of increased consummatory desire, the general experience of solace, or the inability to experience pleasure. Rather, as per the specific characteristics above, we will prioritize investigations of anhedonia as it relates to disabilities in the effort-based reward system--e.g. shortened motivation to complete assignments and abridged capacity to apply effort to achieve a goal."

In other texts, Wellcome Leap is only interesting to treating the various aspects of depression that interfere with an individual's ability to work , not in improving an individual's quality or pleasure of life.

Leap tones, in discussing its goals, that it seeks to develop patterns for how patients respond to treatments that include "novel or existing behavior modification, psychotherapy, drug, and neurostimulation options" while also capturing an individual's "genome, phenome[ the sum of an individual's phenotypic mannerisms ],[ neural] system connectivity, metabolome[ the sum of an individual's metabolic characters ], microbiome, remuneration processing plasticity heights, " among others.

It eventually aims to predict the relationship between an individual's genome to how "reward processing" runs in the psyche. It implies that the data used to create this simulation should involve the use of wearables, stating that researchers "should seek to leverage high frequency patient-worn or in-home amounts in addition to those obtained in the clinic, hospital or laboratory."

One of the central research areas included in the program sounds to "develop new scalable assessment an instrument for reliable and high-density quantification of humor( both subjectively reported and objectively quantified via biometrics such as voice, facial expression, etc .), sleep, movement, reward system functioning, endeavour/ motivation/ power degrees, social interaction, caloric intake, and HPA axis output in real-world situations."

The HPA( hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal) axis is mentioned throughout the document, and this is significant as it is both a negative and positive feedback system regulating the mechanisms of stress reactions, exemption, and also fertility in the human body.

The latter is of particular importance given the Wellcome Trust's ties to the UK eugenics move. It is likewise worth noting that some commercially available wearables, such as Amazon's Halo, once quantify mood, sleep, and movement.

The program's columnists go even further than the above in terms of what they wish to monitor in real meter, territory, "We solely encourage the development of non-invasive technology to immediately interrogate human mentality state." Patterns include "a non-invasive spinal tap equivalent, " "behavioral or biomarker examinations of neural plasticity, " and "single-session neural monitoring abilities that outlines a treatment-predictive mentality state."

In other paroles, this Wellcome Leap planned and its scribes seek to develop "non-invasive" and, likely, wearable engineering capable of monitoring an individual's mood, facial expressions, social interactions, attempt and motivating, and potentially even thoughts in order to "directly interrogate human brain state."

To think that such a maneuver would stay only in the realm of research is naive, especially given that WEF luminaries have openly spoken at Davos convenes about how authorities plan to use such technology widely on its own population as a means of pre-emptively targeting would-be dissension and ushering in an era of "digital dictatorships."

The focus on treating only the aspects of depression that interfere with a person's work further suggests that such technology, once developed, would be used to ensure "perfect worker" behavior in manufactures where human craftsmen are rapidly being replaced with AI and machines, intending the rulers can be more selective about which beings continue to be employed and which do not.

Like other Wellcome Leap planneds, if accomplished, the fruits of the Multi-Channel Psych program will likely be used to ensure a population of docile automatons whose shifts and thinkings are heavily surveilled and monitored.

The Last Leap for an Old Agenda

Wellcome Leap is no small endeavor, and its administrators have the funding, force, and connections to make their dreams actuality. The organization's leadership includes the key force behind Silicon Valley's pushing to commercialize transhumanist tech( Regina Dugan ), the "architect" of the MEMS industry( Ken Gabriel ), and the "ruler" of the burgeoning genetic-sequencing industry( Jay Flatley ).

It too benefits from the funding of the world's largest medical-research foundation, the Wellcome Trust, which is also one of the leading actions in mold genetics and biotechnology research as well as health plan globally.

A 1994 Sunday Times investigation into the Trust noticed ... ... that "through[ Wellcome Trust] grants and sponsorships, government agencies, universities, hospitals and scientists are forced all regions of the world. The trust distributes more coin to establishments than even the British government's Medical Research Council." It then memo 😛 TAGEND

"In bureaux on the building's first floor, decisions are contacted that affect lives and health on scales comparable with minor conflicts. In the conference room, high above wall street, and in the gather dorm, in the basement, verdicts in biotechnology and genetics are handed down that will help shape the human race."

Little has changed regarding the Trust's influence since that essay was published. If anything, its influence on study tracks and decisions that will "shape the human race" has only grown. Its ex-DARPA officials, who have invested their vocations advancing transhumanist engineering in both the public and private sectors, have overlapping points with those off Wellcome Leap.

Dugan's and Gabriel's commercial projections in Silicon Valley has indicated that Leap presided over by those who have long sought to advance the same engineering for profit and for surveillance. This drastically debilitates Wellcome Leap's claim to now be pursuing new information and communication technologies to merely improve "global health."

type from your brain Regina Dugan's Keynote at Facebook F8 2017. Source: YouTube

Indeed, as this report has shown, most of these technologies would be used in a deeply disturbing era of mass surveillance over both the external and internal activities of human beings, including young children and babes, while also creating a new period of remedy based predominantly on gene-editing regimen, the risks of which are considerable and too regularly downplayed by its promoters.

When one understands the insinuate ligament that has long existed between eugenics and transhumanism, Wellcome Leap and its passions see excellent smell. In a recent section written by John Klyczek for Unlimited Hangout, it was noted that the first director general of UNESCO and onetime president of the UK Eugenics Society was Julian Huxley, who coined the call "transhumanism" in his 1957 diary New Bottles for New Wine.

As Klyczek wrote, Huxley argued that "the eugenic goals of biologically engineering human growth should be refined through transhumanist engineerings, which integrate the eugenic methods of genetic engineering with neurotech that consolidates human beings and machines into a new organism."

Earlier, in 1946, Huxley noted in his vision for UNESCO that it was essential that "the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at bet so that much that is now preposterous may at least become thinkable, " an startling testimony to form so soon after the end of World War II.

Thanks in vast duty to the Wellcome Trust and its affect on both policy and medical research over the course of several decades, Huxley's dream of rehabilitating eugenics-infused discipline in the post-World War II era could soon becomes a reality. Unsurprisingly, the Wellcome Trust hosts the archive of the formerly Huxley-led Eugenics Society and still boasts close ties to its successor organization, the Galton Institute.

The over-riding question is: Will we admit ourselves to continue to be controlled into allowing transhumanism and eugenics to be openly prosecuted and normalized, including through initiatives like those of Wellcome Leap that seek to use newborn and toddlers as test subjects to advance their frightening see for humanity?

If well-crafted advertising slogans and media campaigns painting dreams of utopia such as "a world without disease" are all that is needed to convince us to give up our future and our children's future to armed agents, corporate directors, and eugenicists, then there is little left of our humanity to surrender.

Read more: articles.mercola.com


Government Wants to Dictate Truth

“Misinformation is much more destructive when it emanates from a monopolistic' Ministry of Truth, ’” Hannah Cox, material manager for Foundation for Economic Education, writes in a July 25, 2021, commodity. 1

“[ Anthony] Fauci can’t get his own details straight-out, yet the government wants to decide what’s' misinformation’ on social media, ” she adds, pointing to National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases( NIAID) lead Fauci’s information during a recent Congressional committee hearing in which Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky ., questioned him about his funding of gain-of-function research on coronaviruses. Cox writes: 2

“In his opening statement, Paul invoked an academic paper3 that further are questioning the causes of the COVID-1 9 variance that upended the world.

'We hypothesize that the direct progenitor of SARS-CoV may have originated after sequential recombination happens between the precursors of these SARSr-CoVs, ’ stated the numerous scientists and doctors who authored the research.

The data is the last in a long line of evidence that has emerged indicating the viability of the theory that the disease not only came from a lab, but that the NIH actually funded the laboratory and research that may have displayed it.

But in a May hearing, when primarily pressed on it by Dr. Paul, Fauci denied that his agency funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology( WIV ).

Those evidences were brought into doubt. The NIH did fund experiment at WIV that analyzed bat specimens collected from caves in China to study their potential for infecting humans. The subsidy was uttered in a roundabout way through a nonprofit announced EcoHealth.”

When pulped, Fauci contended "hes never" lied before Congress, and would not retract his May 11, 2021, word in which he claimed the NIH has “never funded gain-of-function research.” According to Fauci, the PLOS Pathogens paper4 Paul interposed as evidence has been “judged by qualified candidates, up and down the series, as not being gain-of-function.”

“It appears that instead of arguing the actual data, Fauci is now resorting to semantics around the definition of' gain-of-function, ’” Cox writes, 5 “but even to a scientific amateur it is becoming increasingly clear that Fauci misled the American public for some time on this matter. He knew he allowed the funding required and was not forthcoming on that fact -- even when asked by a sitting Senator.”

Paul Highlights Verbatim Admission

Paul performs nothing more affected with the semantics defense and has publicly announced Fauci out as a storyteller. In a July 20, 2021, tweet, Paul said, 6 “Yes, Dr. Fauci’s NIH did fund the Wuhan Virology Lab. Here’s the verbatim admission from their prime scientist Dr. Shi Zhengli.”

plos pathogens

In a follow-up tweet on that same day, Paul territory: 7

“MIT biologist Kevin Esvelt evaluated this paper that was published with financial assistance from Dr. Fauci’s NIH/ NIAID and concluded' particular skills that the researchers used seemed to meet the definition of gain-of-function.’”

July 20, 2021, Paul went on the Hannity program, 8 announcing he “will be sending a letter to Department of Justice asking for a criminal referral because he[ Fauci] has lied to Congress, ” a misdemeanour punishable by up to five years in prison, supplementing “We have scientists "thats been" lined up by the dozens be mentioned that the research he was funding was gain-of-function.” A month earlier, May 12, 2021, Paul offset the same argument, telling Fox News: 9

“What Dr. Fauci said yesterday was verifiably false. He said no NIH fund came to the Wuhan Institute for advantage of perform. Well, the primary physician there, the one they announce ... the bat girl ... wrote a paper that MIT scientists have look back that they said was advantage of part -- signifying juicing up these viruses to meet them very potent and foul humans.

She wrote this paper and, in the present working paper, recognise her funding came from Dr. Fauci’s group, the NIAID, which is part of NIH. So, he is verifiably telling you something that is not true. In the concession application ... it says it is for gain of part ... So, Dr. Fauci came to Congress yesterday and lied.”

WIV Deleted US Research Partners from Website

Before March 2021, NIAID collaboration and funding of research at the WIV could easily be verified simply by visiting the WIV’s website where it scheduled its research partners. However, shortly after Fauci certified in a Senate hearing in March 2021,10 the WIV unexpectedly deleted mentions of its cooperation with the NIAID/ NIH and various other American research partners.

As of March 21, 2021, the lab’s website scheduled the following U.S.-based research partners: University of Alabama, University of North Texas, EcoHealth Alliance, Harvard University, the National Academy of Health( NIH ), the United States, and the National Wildlife Federation. 11

The next day, merely two remained: EcoHealth Alliance and the University of Alabama. 12 At the same time, the WIV likewise removed studies with hallmark descriptions of gain-of-function research on the SARS virus. 13

According to investigative journalist Ben Swann, 14 the NIH/ NIAID has funded gain-of-function research to the tune of at least $41.7 million. Up until 2014, this research was conducted by Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina( UNC ). In 2014, the U.S. government issued a postponement on federal gain-of-function research funding due to safety, ethical and moral concerns raised within the scientific community.

At that quality, NIAID funding for this kind of research started being funneled through the EcoHealth Alliance to the WIV. Swann scrutinizes certificates he imagines is proof that Fauci lied to Congress, including a paper1 5 entitled “SARS-Like WIV1-CoV Poised for Human Emergence, ” submitted to PNAS in 2015 and subsequently be made available in 2016. In this paper, the authors be said that 😛 TAGEND

“Overall, the results from these studies foreground the utility of a platform that leverages metagenomics findings and reverse genetics to identify prepandemic threats.

For SARS-like WIV1-CoV, the data can inform surveillance curricula, improve diagnostic reagents, and promote effective therapies to mitigate future coming occurrences. However, structure new and chimeric reagents must be carefully weighed against possible gain-of-function( GoF) concerns.”

At the end of that paper, the authors thank “Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein.” They likewise specify that the research was supported by the NIAID under the grant awards U19AI109761 and U19AI107810, which together total $41.7 million.

Grant Letter Dispels Semantics Defense

A letter1 6,17 from the Department of Health and Human Services( DHHS) to the director of propositions at UNC Chapel Hill, discussing grant U19AI107810, too keeps a crick in Fauci’s attempt to change the definition of gain-of-function, and stands in direct challenge to its statement of claim that the NIAID has never funded gain-of-function research, and that Baric’s research never involved gain-of-function. The October 21, 2014, symbol states, in part 😛 TAGEND

“NIAID has determined that the above referenced grant may include Gain of Function( GoF) investigate that is subject to the recently-announced U.S. Government funding pause ...

The following specific targets appear to involve research covered under the pause: Project 1: Role of Uncharacterized Genes in High Pathogenic Human Coronavirus Infect -- Ralph S. Baric, PhD -- Project Leader. Specific Aim 1. Novel Functions in virus replication in vitro. Specific Aim 3. Novel operates in virus pathogenesis in vivo.”

' Fauci Found It Appropriate to Lie’

“This would certainly not be the first time Fauci has been caught giving the American people false information, ” Cox writes. 18 “From the very beginning of the crisis, Fauci noted it appropriate to lie to the people and control valuable report in various regions of the pandemic.”

She goes on to highlight Fauci’s ever-changing opinion about cover-up wearing. Scientific evidence pictures face masks do not prevent viral afflictions. 19 This includes COVID-1 9-specific research2 0,21 from Denmark, which pointed out that mask wearing may either reduce your risk of SARS-CoV-2 illnes by as much as 46%, or increase your risk by 23%. Either way, the vast majority -- 97.9% of those who didn’t wear cover-ups, and 98.2% of those who did -- remained infection free.

Among mask wearers, 1.8% ceased up testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, compared to 2.1% among limitations. When they removed those who did not adhere to the recommendations for use, the research results remained the same -- 1.8%, which suggests adherence stimulates no divergence. Among those who reported wearing their face mask “exactly as instructed, ” 2% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 comparison with 2.1% of the controls.

Back in March 2020, Fauci was on the right track, publicly be said that cover-ups cannot prevent viral infection. The video above boasts one such expression. At the time, Fauci stated2 2 that “people should not be walking around with masks” because “it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.” Merely symptomatic individuals and health care workers were urged to wear them.

Fauci even pointed out that mask wearing has “unintended consequences” as “people keep fidget with their mask and they hinder touching their face, ” which may actually increase the risk of contracting and/ or spreading the virus.

In February 2020, Surgeon General Jerome Adams too sent out a tweet pushing Americans to stop buying masks, saying they are "NOT effective."2 3( He has all along been removed that tweet .) Adams likewise points out that if tattered or directed improperly, face concealments can increase your risk of infection. 24

Fauci Admits Issuing Intentional Misinformation

By July 2020, Fauci declared his initial dismissal of face cover-ups was an intentional fib, as there was a shortage of personal protective material( PPE) at the time and he wanted to ensure there would be enough for frontline employees. 25 “If we listen to Fauci’s account, he basically believed it was alright to prioritize some men over others and lie to parties in the process, ” Cox writes. 26

This is a classic portrait of the use of what Plato calls the Nobel Lie. It is fine to lie as long as it is for the greater good. Fast-forward a few weeks, and by the end of July 2020, Fauci indicated lending goggles and full face shields, in addition to a concealment, ostensibly because the mucous membranes of your eyes could potentially serve as entryways for viruses as well. 27

Interestingly enough, a March 31, 2020, report2 8 in JAMA Ophthalmology observed SARS-CoV-2-positive conjunctival specimens( i.e ., specimen taken from the eye) in exactly 5.2% of shown COVID-1 9 patients( two out of 28 ). What’s more, taint of the eyes is likely chiefly the result of touching your eyes with contaminated fingers, and if "youre wearing" goggles or a face shield, you may be more prone to touch your eyes to rub away sweat, moisture and/ or scratch an itch.

Fauci’s destructive track record of misinformation, laid bare throughout his numerous rounds with Rand Paul, demonstrates why the government has no business trying to be a monolithic source and judge of truth.~ Hannah Cox, Foundation for Economic Education

Around December 2020, recommendations for double-masking emerged, 29 gaining impetu through substantial media coverage as we moved into the first weeks of 2021,30 at which occasion Fauci agreed that wearing two disguises instead of merely one was “common sense” as it would likely ply greater safety. 31

By early May 2021, Fauci introduced the suggestion that we might also start wearing face cover-ups during influenza season after the COVID-1 9 pandemic fades “to help avoid spreading or contracting respiratory illnesses like the flu.” Mid-July 2021, Fauci also insisted mothers should continue to mask children aged 2 and older, saying: 32

“Unvaccinated children of a certain age greater than two years old should be wearing concealments. No doubt about that. That’s the way to protect them from get infected, because if they do, they can then spread the infection to someone else.”

No brand-new scientific suggestion to carry disguising against respiratory viruses has been presented, however. Cox likewise points out that Fauci recommended national institution closes even if they are published science depicted children are predominantly immune3 3,34 to SARS-CoV-2 infectious diseases and are not significant vectors for spread. 35 More recent research3 6 depicts children, when infected, likewise have a survival rate of 99.995%.

Government Nominates Itself as Ministry of Truth

“To add insult to injury, the government has nominated itself as the sole umpire of truth when it comes to information on the coronavirus, ” Cox writes, computing: 37

“The Biden Administration has claimed misinformation on social media platforms is' killing people’ and has openly been persuading Facebook to remove poles that do not align with their narrative ... This is concerning for several reasons.

First and foremost, it is a violation of free speech and the free market for the government to tell any private business how to run its operations. Plain and simple.

Additionally, the government has no business being in a position of determining what the truth is or is not. They’ve been caught lying more meters than we can count and are likely to continue, established how misinforming the public often serves to increase their own power.

The government’s track record of correct by no means begins with COVID, but has certainly grown with it. This is the last entity we should rely with a monopoly over information.

Fauci’s devastating track record of misinformation, laid bare throughout his many rounds with Rand Paul, indicates why the government has no business trying to be a monolithic source and expert of truth.”

Senator Introduces Bill to Force Online Censorship

July 22, 2021, The Wall Street Journal3 8 reported Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn ., first introduced a statement “that would strip online programmes such as Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc. of their indebtednes armours if their engineerings spread misinformation related to public-health emergencies, such as the Covid-1 9 pandemic.”

Section 230 protects internet stages from suits arising from content generated by consumers and third parties. Klobuchar’s bill would create an exception to this law, the Health and Human Services department( HHS) would be responsible for dictating what state message are accurate and what is misinformation.

Internet pulpits would then be required to censor accordingly or face possible prosecution. Time will tell if this bill will pass and stand up to law scrutiny.

As noted by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in an April 5, 2021, ruling3 9 in which he weighed in on the ability of social media beings to control free speech, “The government cannot accomplish through threats of untoward government act what the Constitution proscribes it from doing directly.”

After Censorship, Will Social Credit System Be Far Behind?

If government censorship becomes law, will a social approval plan based on government narrative adherence be far behind? “We need to act now to block Britain’s social credit system, ” columnist Ross Clark writes in a July 24, 2021, Spectator article. 40

While Clark, exactly 12 daytimes earlier, had estimated it might take two to five years for a British COVID vaccination passport scheme to transition into a full-blown social ascribe plan like that of China, in reality, it’s already being reeled out.

“This morning it was reported that the government is planning to introduce a health app in January which will observe our supermarket, our practise positions, or intake of fruit and vegetables -- and reinforce us with righteousnes stations which we can exchange for deductions, free tickets ... and other goodies, ” Clark writes. 41

Considering the whole world is acting in lockstep -- as was indicated and therefore recommends the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” report4 2 -- it’s probably merely a matter of time before the same types of social ascribe composition “carrot” comes dangled in front of our faces here in the United States.

First Comes the Carrot, Then the Stick

Looking back, it’s easy to see how the carrot and the affix have been intermittently used to herd the population toward a wanted objective. While coming everyone injected with SARS-CoV-2 spike inducing mRNA is clearly one goal, it’s not the only one.

As indicated by Clark, a social recognition organization that gifts outside organizations complete control over your life is also being introduced, one tiny stair at a time. And, like with the COVID jabs, carrots to get parties to freely embrace this social credit system are deployed firstly. The stick will come out last-minute, as it has with the COVID shots.

ABC News panelist Margaret Hoover recently told George Stephanopoulos she visualizes government ought to reach life “almost impossible” for people who reject the COVID shot. 43

To that intent, she proposes acquiring COVID injectables a requirement for government-provided health and financial services, such as VA treatment, Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security remittances, “because ... we are going to have to take care of you on the back end.”

PayPal to Block Certain Financial Transactions

Those relying on Social Security aren’t the only ones who might begin to feel the sting of the put. More than 150 health care workers were recently burnt from Houston Methodist for refusing the experimental COVID jab, 44 and many other professings face the same “jab or job” dilemma.

PayPal is also use the stick against the self-employed and small businesses that aren’t toeing the desired line. It recently partnered with the Anti-Defamation League’s Center on Extremism “to investigate how extremist and hate changes in the United Regime take advantage of financial programmes to fund their criminal activities, ” Reuters reported, July 26, 2021,45 with the aim of “disrupting” such transactions.

The headline, “PayPal to Research Event That Fund Hate Groups, Extremists, ” had originally included the word “Blocking.” Perhaps announcing that PayPal will actually block the financial transactions of those suspected of harboring anti-government feelings was too great a truth bomb for the average Reuters audience?

Targeted entities include individuals and companies suspected of supporting white supremacy and anti-government narrations, and anyone spreading information materials and/ or profiting from antisemitism, islamophobia, racism, anti-immigrant, anti-Black, anti-Hispanic and anti-Asian bigotry.

The information collected will be shared with other international financial institutions, law enforcement and policymakers. It doesn’t take a genius to deduce where this might end up, considering intelligence agencies are already deploying sophisticated cyberwarfare tools against civilians. 46,47, 48 As reported by independent investigative reporter Whitney Webb in an section for Unlimited Hangout: 49

“British and American state intelligence agencies are' weaponizing truth’ ... in a recently announced' cyber war’ to be required by AI-powered judges of truth against information sources that challenge official narratives.”

While it can cause discomfort, the best defense is a serene pique. If you don’t like where things are headed, pleasant insubordination is likely to be the most effective way to push back, be it against concealment authorizations, action vaccinations, a two-tier society of injected/ unvaccinated with unequal rights and advantages, obligatory inoculation passports, a social recognition system, or all of the above.

Read more: articles.mercola.com


COVID-19 pandemic: Tata Steel initiatives reach 1 mn beneficiaries: Chairman N Chandrasekaran

To combat COVID-1 9 pandemic, initiatives by Tata Steel including supplying 61,000 tonnes of liquid oxygen from its facilities to moods for setting up 1,600 hospital bunks for medication of fouled has benefitted about one million people, Chairman N Chandrasekaran has said.Those reach from international efforts were not only the employees and their families but too the community members in and around our operating points, he said."The past 18 months have been challenging for all of us in many ways. We have learnt unprecedented seasons due to the spread of the COVID-1 9 pandemic across the world and it has not yet abetted with numerou variants of the virus still a threat to human lives."As part of the efforts to combat COVID-1 9, your business #CombatCovid19 programme and direct COVID-Care support has reached the lives of over 1 million beneficiaries, " the Chairman said.The chief of the sword giant said to help the nation during the second motion of the pandemic, Tata Steel took significant steps to supply medical oxygen to several states in India and till mid-June, 2021, gave 61,000 million tonnes liquid oxygen from its installations.In addition, Tata Steel organization undertake several outreach programmes for the community to extend help and support on health, livelihood and sustenance of the marginalised section of the society, he said."Your company continues to be committed to do its best and ply necessary support to the community and the commonwealth at this time of crisis, " he asserted.As the purposes of the pandemic, the Indian steel industry has also suffered product losses due to the national lockdown especially in the first two quarterss of the financial year.But, they recovered gradually in the third largest and fourth part driving in strong revival in the domestic steel demand and backlash in manufacturing and infrastructure development activity in India, he added.Tata Steel is currently the world countries second-most geographically diversified sword producer and one of the few steel functionings that are fully integrated from mining to the manufacturing and marketing of finished products.Set up in 1907, it has to its recognition development of Indias firstly industrial metropolitan at Jamshedpur and is among the leading world-wide sword companies.For the Financial year 2020 -2 1, the consolidated revenues of the company increased by five per cent to Rs 1,56, 294 crore while the consolidated earning after imposition also increased to Rs 8,190 crore.

Read more: economictimes.indiatimes.com