Dalelorenzo's GDI Blog
18Apr/210

The Ugly Truth About COVID

Nick Hudson, an actuary and private equity investor, co-founded Pandemics~ Data& Analytics( PANDA) in response to the many threats to civil rights and freedoms that have occurred during the COVID-1 9 pandemic response. While media and public health universities have engaged in a campaign of smoke and mirrors -- one that is perpetuating paralyzing suspicion, needlessly, to this day -- data and points don’t lie.

Hudson and his unit at PANDA, which include a data analyst, economist, medical doctors, large-hearted data analyst and public health professionals, are using live data1 and open science to sanction the public to rehearsal freedom of choice and perpetuate free civilizations. 2

Hudson spoke at the inaugural BizNews Investment Conference in March 2021, and his keynote address is above. He interprets the ugly truth about COVID-1 9, which is that the world is being crippled by fear due to a fallaciou narrative. Anyone who challenges that narrative is being labeled as a lunatic, a danger or a danger to society, which is furthering the repression and unjustified fear.

Bringing COVID-1 9 Truth to Light

George Washington famously said, “Truth will ultimately prevail where there are plans carried out in order to bring it to light.”3 With that in sentiment, Hudson envisioned the “seeds of a great tragedy” being embed with the fictitiou COVID-1 9 narrative, and has established it a mission to get the truth out. So, what is the reality about the pandemic? According to Hudson: 4

A virus that presents increased risk to few and inconsequential jeopardy to most hit some regions

Few are susceptible to severe disease

There are several accessible treatments

Asymptomatic people are not major moves of disease

Lockdowns and disguise commissions haven’t acted and instead justification immense harm

The prone were hurt instead of helped

The misinformation has been spewed from the start, including by World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. In a March 3, 2020, media briefing, he stated, “Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-1 9 cases going to die. By comparison, seasonal influenza generally kills far less than 1% of those infected.”5

But according to Hudson, the 3.4% represents contingency fatality rate( CFR ), which is the number of deaths from COVID-1 9 divided by the number of cases of COVID-1 9, while the 1% is illnes fatality rate( IFR ), or the number of deaths divided by all infected individuals.

“By conflating these two separate pitches( CFR and IFR ), ” Hudson said, “Tedros was effectively lying.” Quantitative scientist John Ioannidis, prof of medication at the Stanford Prevention Research Center, calculated the IFR for COVID-1 9 in its examination of 61 seroprevalence studies, which was a median of 0.23%, and 0.05% in people younger than 70.6

Based on this, the IFR for COVID-1 9 be less than that of the flu. And wouldn’t you know it, in a New England Journal of Medicine editorial published March 26, 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci, lead of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases( NIAID ), and collaborators expressed the view that “the overall clinical consequences of Covid-1 9 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.”7

The media have repressed this reality, Hudson mentioned, along with the fact that there’s a 1,000 times gap in fatality among those younger than 19 and those older than 70 -- something that should have been taken into account in the pandemic response.

Is COVID-1 9 Really a' Novel Virus’?

Further inflaming widespread horror is the idea that COVID-1 9 is a “novel virus, ” which realizes it sound like it’s something humans "ve never" encountered before. But is it certainly? According to Hudson 😛 TAGEND

“The reality is that the coronavirus is a very close relative , not even a separate subspecies, a very close relative of the 2003 SARS virus. There are seven related coronaviruses known to cause disease in humen, probably many others, and four members of them is generally circulation.

Annual, world circulation. So the refer of this malady is terribly inconsistent. Now a rose by any identify, SARS. A variance of SARS. It’s not novel.”

One study even found that 81% of parties not exposed to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that motives COVID-1 9, were still able to mount an immune response against it, which “suggests at least some built-in immune protection from SARS-CoV-2 ... ”8

Nonetheless, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO’s technological lead-in for the COVID-1 9 pandemic, stated that “a majority of the world’s population is prone to infection from this virus.”9 This is the firstly of two key elements that, Hudson said, lead to “homosapienophobia” -- the idea that everyone is dangerous until proven healthy.

The idea of universal susceptibility to COVID-1 9 is nonsense, Hudson observed, as was demonstrated early on with the Diamond Princess cruise ship. Among the 3,711 passengers and crew onboard the Diamond Princess, 712( 19.2%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and of these 46.5% were asymptomatic at the time of testing. Of those showing evidences, simply 9.7% required intensive care and 1.3%( nine) died. 10

PANDA data also goes to show that, starting in February 2021, there was not universal susceptibility to the virus. Their data evidenced cumulative COVID-1 9 deaths per million people. In Africa, Southeast Asia and Oceania, the population fatality rate was 112 per million compared against 710 per million in Europe and the Americas.

As for Africa, Southeast Asia and Oceania, Hudson said, “the population fatality rate there virtually isn’t an epidemic. In a typical time, they’d have 10,000 deaths per million from all causes.”

Suspicion Mongering Over Asymptomatic Spread

The second element that enables the doctrine of “everyone being a danger” to continue is the idea of asymptomatic spread driving sicknes. “I was absolutely aghast to find out the poor quality of the science” behind it, Hudson said.

One of the seminal papers involved one woman who were allegedly infected 16 collaborators while she was asymptomatic. 11 The study was widely used to suggest that asymptomatic spread was following, but controversy later ensued over whether the woman was actually asymptomatic when the others were infected or if she was symptomatic and is dealt with for flu-like evidences at the time. 12

In June 2020, Kerkhove also made it very clear that people who have COVID-1 9 without any indications “rarely” move the disease to others. But in a startling about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement simply the working day later. June 9, 2020, Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of WHO’s emergencies platform, rapidly backpedaled Van Kerkhove’s statement, saying the statements were “misinterpreted or perhaps we didn’t use the most elegant names to explain that.”1 3

“It’s utter, emit stupidity, ” Hudson said, adding that Fauci also stated in January 2020, “asymptomatic transmission has never been the operator of eruptions. The move of eruptions is always a symptomatic person.”1 4

A JAMA Network Open study last-minute obtain, in December 2020, that asymptomatic transmission is not a primary operator of infection within households. 15 A study in Nature Communications likewise met "there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive someone to marked close contacts."1 6

Lockdown Madness

The myth of widespread asymptomatic spread is what was used to justify worldwide lockdowns of healthy parties. “Bruce Aylward will go down in biography as a criminal of stupendou prominence, ” Hudson said, referring to Aylward’s role as the head of a WHO team that toured Wuhan, China, and concluded lockdowns were working to stop COVID-1 9 spread. 17

“He takes a delegation to China, depletes a few days, then comes back and says everyone should follow China’s response, the doctrine of universal susceptibility, ” Hudson said. Yet, prior to the COVID-1 9 pandemic official guidelines for pandemic response designs recommend against large-scale quarantine of the healthy.

In fact, WHO wrote that during an flu pandemic, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry and exit screening and border ending are “not recommended in any circumstance.”1 8P TAGEND

Likewise, in 2021 a study published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation determined no significant benefits on COVID-1 9 instance rise in regions employing more restrictive nonpharmaceutical involvements( NPIs) such as mandatory stay-at-home and business close fiats( i.e ., lockdowns ). 19

Data compiled by PANDA too perceived no link between lockdowns and COVID-1 9 deaths per million people. The illnes followed a path of linear nosedive regardless of whether or not lockdowns were imposed.

What isn’t a lie, however, is that lockdowns cause a great deal of evil. Child mortality, privation, starvation and joblessness is on the increase, as are slows in medical treatment and diagnosis, psychological disorders among youth, suicide and deaths of despair.

Education has been interrupted for an estimated 1.6 billion children, Hudson said, and a questionnaire of 2,000 U.S. adults is demonstrated that 1 in 6 Americans started rehabilitation for the first time during 2020. Almost half( 45%) of the survey respondents reconfirmed that the COVID-1 9 pandemic was the driving reason that triggered them to seek a therapist’s help. 20 According to Hudson 😛 TAGEND

“Perhaps the hardest thing for me to swallow about all of this is in undergraduate epidemiology, it is a well-known finding that when you are confronted with a disease with sharp-worded perimeter graduation, as you are with coronavirus , appropriate measures to generally hushes the spread of the disease have the effect, reliably, of switch the disease onu onto the vulnerable, who we should be protecting. They degenerate coronavirus mortality.”

Mask Rhetoric Is Misleading

It’s been touted that face concealments are essential to stopping the spread of COVID-1 9 and trying to save 130,000 lives in the U.S. alone. 21 But in 2019, the The world health organisation analyzed 10 randomized self-restrained trials and concluded, “there was no evidence that facemasks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”2 2

Only one randomized self-restrained trial has been conducted on mask usage and COVID-1 9 transfer, and it located disguises did not statistically significantly reduce the incidence of infection. 23

You may remember that in the early days of the pandemic, face masks were not recommended for the general public. In February 2020, Christine Francis, the expert consultants for illnes avoidance and control at WHO headquarters, was incorporated in a video, holding up a expendable face mask.

She said, “Medical disguises like this one cannot protect against the brand-new coronavirus when abused alone ... WHO only recommends the use of masks in specific cases.”2 4 As of March 31, 2020, WHO was still advising against the use of face masks for parties without manifestations, stating that there is “no evidence” that such concealment utilization prevents COVID-1 9 transmitting. 25

But by June 2020, the rhetoric change over time. Citing “evolving evidence, ” WHO overturned their recommendation and began advising governments to encourage the general public to wear masks where there is widespread transmission and physical distancing is difficult. 26 Yet that very same day, June 5, 2020, WHO published an announcement stating: 27

“At present, "were not receiving" direct suggestion( from studies on COVID-1 9 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy beings in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-1 9. ”

The U.S. Hubs for Disease Control and Prevention did a same about-face on cover-up application, citing research studies of two hair dressers in Missouri, who had allegedly been symptomatic with COVID-1 9 and styled 139 clients’ hair.

None of the clients tested positive for COVID-1 9, which the CDC suggested was because they and the stylists wore cover-ups. 28 Hudson concludes, nonetheless, that the customers were probably young and not suggestible to the virus in the first place.

Another study published in the CDC’s journal Emerging Infectious Diseases territory, “We did not find evidence that surgical-type face disguises are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when threadbare by infected persons( informant hold) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility.”2 9

PANDA data also pictured no differences in transmission in moods with concealment commissions and those without. Still, state officials are now advising you should double or triple up on disguises to compile them work better.

Vaccine Being Sold as a Ticket to Freedom

People who stand to move countless billions out of COVID-1 9 inoculations are now selling them as air tickets to freedom, Hudson moods 😛 TAGEND

“How convenient that we now have a logic that tells us that we need to inoculate 7.8 billion people for an illness that has a convey survival rates of 99.95% for parties under the age of 70. The profiteering here is naked. It is transparent.”

It’s a sad situation when adolescents, who aren’t at high risk, are lining up for vaccines really to get their freedoms back, he contributes. When you supplement in all the other divergences and lies -- PCR assessments that are not capable of diagnosing infectiousness, overstated extinction numbers, restrictions on travel, media hype and arbitrary conventions, like the CDC’s recent change in physical distancing in classrooms from 6 hoofs to 3 feet3 0 -- it’s as though we’re living in an Orwellian reality.

With looming vaccine passports, the loss of personal immunities is at an unprecedented level, while beings are generally “enslaved by fear” -- dread of infection or reinfection, “long COVID, ” resurgence and mutant variants. “The underpinnings of our civilization are under threat, ” Hudson memo, and we have a choice. “We’ve been pushed up against a cliff, will we be pushed off or will we push back? ”

He urges beings to support the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for “focused protection” and locating a middle ground between fastening down an entire economy and simply “letting it rip.” As of April 4, 2021, the declaration has mustered 41,890 signatures from medical practitioner and over 13,796 signatures from medical and public health scientists. 31

In addition, the declaration is open for public signatures and has compiled 764,089 from concerned citizens various regions of the world. The website allows you to read and sign the declaration, refutes many frequently asked questions, shares the social sciences behind the proposals and explains how the declaration was written.

PANDA also published a etiquette for reopening civilization “to provide a road map out of the devastate hertz of lockdowns.”3 2 Hudson repeated Nelson Mandela, who territory firmnes is not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. We all need to strive for courage and foundation awareness campaigns aimed at stopping the pernicious narrative, counteracting dread and protecting future freedom.

Read more: articles.mercola.com

17Mar/210

COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Are Gene Therapy

As calls for obligatory COVID-1 9 vaccination grow various regions of the world, it's becomes increasingly crucial to understand what these insertions actually are. The mRNA "vaccines" created by Moderna and Pfizer are in fact gene cares.

As I'll explain below, there's simply no way around this, and drug manufacturers and public health officials must be made to admit this point. Why? Because it makes all the divergence in the world. You cannot mandate a gene therapy against COVID-1 9 any more than you can force entire populations to undergo gene therapy for a cancer they do not have and may never be at risk for.

Interestingly enough, mainstream media, knowledge checkers and various manufacture front groups hold the gene regiman assert is bogus, even though every single detail about the vaccines screams otherwise. Why are they spreading this disinformation? Why do they not want you to know what these injections actually are?

In short, they know labeling them as "gene therapies" would be like slapping a skull and crossbones label on them. Most parties have enough common sense have discovered that gene therapy is a different ballgame from a regular vaccination, and might be a bad thought, especially for children and younger someones.

mRNA 'Vaccines' Fulfill None of the Criteria for a Vaccine

To start, let's take a look at some basic definitions of words. Harmonizing to the U.S. Cores for Disease Control and Prevention, a inoculation is: 1

"A product that animates a person's immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease."

Immunity, in turn, is defined as:

"Protection from an infectious disease, " meaning that "If "youre ever" immune to an illness, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected."

That's the medical explanation. The legal explanation, in the few cases where it has been detailed, is equally unequivocal:

Iowa code2 -- "Vaccine wants a specially developed antigen dispensed to person or persons for the purpose of providing immunity."

Washington state code3, 4 -- "Vaccine necessitates a been prepared by a killed or attenuated living micro-organism, or fraction thereof ... " The statute too specifies that a vaccine "upon immunization induces exemption that protects us against infection ... "

These clarities, both medical and law, present problems for mRNA "vaccines, " since 😛 TAGEND

mRNA infusions do not impart immunity. Moderna and Pfizer both be recognized that their clinical troubles aren't even looking at immunity. As such they is not fulfill the medical and/ or legal interpretation of a vaccine.

They do not impede transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection. As such they do not fulfill the medical and/ or law explanation of a vaccine.

Dictionaries Attempt to Rewrite Medical Terms

We should not be fooled by attempts to condition the public to accept redefined words. As of February 2019, Merriam-Webster defined5 "vaccine" as "a preparation of killed microbes, living attenuated organisms, or living fully venomous creatures that is administered to produce or artificially increase exemption to a particular disease." By February 26, 2021, the government has informed the definition of "vaccine" to: 6

"A preparation that is administered( as by injection) to stimulate the body's immune response against a particular contagious diseases 😛 TAGEND

a: an antigenic preparation of a often inactivated or attenuated ... pathogenic negotiator( such as a bacterium or virus) or one of its components or makes( such as a protein or toxin)

b: a preparation of genetic fabric( such as a rope of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic essence( such as a fragment of virus spike protein) "

Let's be clear. Merriam-Webster does not dictate medical jargon. It can be used, nonetheless, to confound beings. For now, all medical dictionaries still show the traditional explanation of vaccine, 7 as Merriam-Webster did up until this year. That said, I would not be surprised if modifies are prepare there as well, eventually, if the misrepresentation of COVID-1 9 mRNA inoculations is allowed to stand.

mRNA Therapy Doesn't Satisfy Public Health Measure Directive

There's also the issue of whether a gene regiman is likely to be mandated, and you are able to hinge on it being accepted as a inoculation. The 1905 Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts8 essentially fixed that collective benefit supersedes individual benefit.

Since mRNA rehabilitations do not interpret the immunized party immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective help that annuls individual jeopardy, and therefore cannot be mandated.

Put another way, the decision quarrels( although legal expert diverge on some of the finer detailed description of its interpretation) that it's acceptable for some individuals to be harmed by a public health directive as long as it benefits the collective. Nonetheless, if vaccination is a public health measure meant to protect and benefit the collective, then it would need to accomplish two things 😛 TAGEND

Ensure that the vaccinated person is rendered immune from the disease.

Inhibit transmission of the disease from the vaccinated person to other characters.

We're now back to the original question that mRNA regimen for COVID-1 9 do not accomplish either of these things. Since these gene therapies do not render the person immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective advantage that usurps individual threat.

On the contrary, the only one benefiting from an mRNA "vaccine" is the individual receiving the gene therapy, since all they are designed to do is minimize clinical indications are connected with the S-1 spike protein.

In other utterances, they won't retain you from going sick with SARS-CoV-2; they just expected to minimize your illnes symptoms if or when you do get infected. So, coming inoculated protects no one but yourself. Since you're the only one who will collect a benefit( less severe COVID-1 9 evidences upon illnes ), the justification to accept the risks of the care "for the greater good" of your community is blatantly irrational.

Sell mRNA Therapy as Vaccine Violates Federal Law

Since mRNA "vaccines" do not match the medical and/ or law description of a vaccine, directing to them as inoculations, and commerce them as such, is a deceitful practice that violates9 15 U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 10 the existing legislation that decides advertising of medical practises.

The lack of accomplished human tribulations too keeps these mRNA produces at odds with 15 U.S. Code Section 41. Per this law, 11,12 it is unlawful to advertise "that a product or service can thwart, consider, or medication human malady unless you own skillful and reliable technical manifestation, including, where needed, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the amount claimed are true at the time they are made."

Here's the problem: The primary end point in the COVID-1 9 "vaccine" troubles does not constitute an actual inoculation inquiry end point because, again, vaccine visitation end point have to do with immunity and dissemination reduction. Neither of those was measured.

What's more, key secondary end points in Moderna's trial include prevention of severe COVID-1 9 canker( defined as need for hospitalization) and prevention of illnes by SARS-CoV-2, irrespective of symptoms. 13,14 However, Moderna did not actually measurement charge of infection, stating that it was too "impractical" to do so.

That conveys there's no evidence of this gene therapy having an impact on infection, for better or worse. And, if you have no evidence, you cannot fulfill the U.S. Code requirement that states you must have "competent and reliable scientific attest ... substantiating that the amount claimed are true."

Making materials worse, both Pfizer and Moderna are now eliminating their control radicals by offering the real vaccine to any and all placebo recipients who are interested it. 15 The studies are supposed to go on for a full two years, but by eliminating the domination group, judging the efficiency and jeopardies is going to be near absurd.

What Makes COVID Vaccines Gene Therapy?

Alright. Let's move on to the definition of "gene therapy." As detailed on MedlinePlus.gov's "What Is Gene Therapy" page: 16

"Gene care is an experimental procedure that uses genes to treat or thwart ailment ... Researchers are researching several comings to gene care, including: ... Introducing a brand-new gene into the body to help fight a disease ...

Although gene regiman is a promising treatment alternative for a number of ailments( including inherited disorders, some types of cancer, and sure-fire viral infections ), the technique remains risky and is still under study to make sure that it will be safe and efficient. Gene therapy is currently being tested simply for diseases that have no other cures."

Here, it's importance noting that there are many different treatments that have been shown to be very effective against COVID-1 9, it is therefore certainly does not qualify as an illness that has no cure. It realise sense that gene therapy should be restricted to fatal cancers, as this is the only time that making drastic perils might be warranted. That said, here's how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines gene therapy: 17

"Human gene therapy strives to modify or operate the showing of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cadres for therapeutic abuse. Gene therapy is a technique that revises a person's genes to treat or medication cancer. Gene cares can manipulate by various mechanisms 😛 TAGEND

* Superseding a disease-causing gene with a healthy imitation of the gene

* Inactivating a disease-causing gene that is not functioning properly

* Pioneering a new or modified gene into the body to help treat a disease"

November 17, 2020, the American Society of Gene+ Cell Therapy( ASGCT) announced "COVID-1 9 Vaccine Candidates Show Gene Therapy Is a Viable Strategy, " noting that: 18

"Two COVID-1 9 vaccine experiments, both of which use messenger RNA( or mRNA) engineering to teach the body to fight the virus, have reported efficacy over 90 percent.

These results, announced by Moderna on Nov. 16 and by Pfizer and its partner BioNTech on Nov. 9 ... demonstrate that gene care is a viable strategy for developing vaccines to combat COVID-1 9.

Both vaccine candidates use mRNA to platform a person's cadres to make countless two copies of a fragment of the virus. The fragment then provokes the immune organization to attack if the real virus tries to invade the body."

mRNA Deliver New Genetic Instructions

As explained in the ASGCT's video above, mRNA are molecules that contain genetic teaches for establishing numerous proteins. mRNA "vaccines" deliver a synthetic form of mRNA into your cadres that carry the instruction to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the antigen, that then activates your immune structure to produce antibodies. Then there's Moderna's tribulation website, 19 where they describe their technology thus 😛 TAGEND

"Typical inoculations for viruses are made from a diminished or inactive virus, but mRN-A1 273 is not made from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It is made from messenger ribonucleic battery-acid( mRNA ), a genetic code that tells cells how to clear protein, which assistant the body's immune system make antibodies to fight the virus."

November 18, 2020, Wired magazine made a big deal about COVID-1 9 vaccines being "genetic vaccines, " mention: 20

"The active ingredient inside their shot is mRNA -- portable cords of genetic code that contain the ideas for proteins. Cells use mRNA to get those specs out of hard-bitten DNA storage and into their protein-making mills. The mRNA inside Pfizer and BioNTech's vaccine targets any cadres it contacts to run a coronavirus spike-building program."

Importantly, as reported by David Martin, Ph.D ., 21,22 "Moderna ... describes its concoction not as a inoculation, but as 'gene care technology' in SEC filings. This is because neither Moderna nor Pfizer ... stimulate any affirms about their commodities procreating exemption or frustrating transmission." Additionally, Moderna's SEC filings solely state that "Currently, mRNA is considered a gene rehabilitation make by the FDA, " as well. 23

mRNA Is 'Proven Form of Gene Therapy'

In a February 2021 essay, MIT Technology Review reviewed the history of mRNA technology in general, and Moderna's in particular, stating: 24

"Vaccines were not their focus. At the company's founding in 2010, its leaders imagined they might be able to use RNA to replace the introduced proteins that even up most of the biotech pharmacopoeia, virtually inducing dopes inside the patient's own cadres from an RNA blueprint. 'We were requesting, could we turn a human into a bioreactor? ' says Noubar Afeyan, the company's cofounder ... "

Bloomberg, in August 2020, reported2 5 that the Moderna vaccine would seek to transform your organization into "a vaccine-making machine." The New York Times was more to the level. In May 2020, they reported2 6 that "Researchers at two Harvard-affiliated hospitals are adapting a confirm use of gene therapy to develop a coronavirus vaccine." Read it again -- A established pattern of gene therapy.

So, to summarize: The definition of "genetic" is something relating to genes, and the definition of "therapy" is the medical treatment of a disease. The interpretation of "gene therapy" is the process of modifying or influencing the formulation of a gene, or adapting the biological dimensions of living cells.

mRNA are snippets of genetic code that advises cells to produce proteins. mRNA COVID-1 9 cares "deliver genetic instructions into your cadres, " thereby triggering your body to produce a fragment of the virus( the spike protein ). So, mRNA inoculations ARE gene care. There's simply no way around this. They fulfill all the definitions of gene therapy and nothing of the interpretations for a inoculation.

Defining 'COVID-1 9'

There's yet one more potential problem with the "COVID-1 9 vaccine" narrative as a whole, which Martin unpacked in a January 25, 2021, interview on the Wise Traditions podcast( above ). 27 In it, he clarifies 😛 TAGEND

"COVID-1 9 is not a disease. It consists of a series of clinical symptoms. It is a beings umbrella of things associated with what used to be associated with influenza and with other febrile diseases.

The problem that we have is that in February[ 2020 ], the World Health Organization was clear in stating that there should not be a conflation between[ SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-1 9 ]. One is a virus, in their definition, and one is a set of clinical symptoms. The impression in February was that SARS-CoV-2 caused COVID-1 9.

The problem with that explanation, and with the expectation, is that the majority of people who test positive exploiting the RT-PCR procedure for testing, for fragments of what is associated with SARS-CoV-2, are not ill at all. The illusion that the virus movements a disease came apart. That's the reason why they developed the term asymptomatic carrier."

In short-lived, SARS-CoV-2 has yet to be definitively proven to be the actual crusade of COVID-1 9. So, a gene regiman that teaches your form to produce a SARS-CoV-2 antigen -- the viral spike protein -- cannot even be touted as a preventative against COVID-1 9, as the two have not been shown to be causally associated.

"They have been willfully lying since the inception of this, " Martin says in the interrogation. "There is not a causal link between these things ... It has never even been close to established.

We have a situation where the impression of the problem is that people say, 'I don't want to get COVID-1 9. ' What they necessitate is they don't miss to get infected with a virus. The problem is those two things are not relevant to each other. A viral illnes hasn't been documented in the majority of "whats called" cases.

There is no basis for that conflation other than the manipulation of the public. That's the first half of the problem. The second half of the problem is that what is being touted as a vaccination ... is not a vaccine. This is gene therapy ...

What is this doing? It's sending a filament of synthetic RNA into the human being and is invoking within the human being, the creation of the S1 spike protein, which is a pathogen ... A vaccine is supposed to trigger immunity. It's not supposed to provoke you to make a toxin ...

It's not somewhat different. It's not the same at all ... It's not a vetoing infection. It's not a proscribing transmitting invention. It's a represents by which your torso is conscripted to realize the toxin that then, allegedly, your body somehow get worked to the handling of, but unlike a vaccine -- which is to trigger the immune response -- this is to trigger the creation of the toxin."

Why the Misrepresentation?

As of the reasons why narcotic fellowships are misrepresenting information and communication technologies, Martin supposes "it's done alone so that they can get themselves under the umbrella of public health laws that exploit vaccination."

Experimental gene therapies do not have monetary obligation shielding from the authority, but pandemic inoculations do, even in the experimental place, as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect. This is indeed a major incentive to make sure this technology is perceived as a inoculation and nothing else.

So, by maintaining the illusion that COVID-1 9 is a state of emergency, when in reality it is not, government leaders are providing cover for these gene regiman business so that they are insulated from any responsibility.

Experimental Gene Therapy Is a Bad Idea

I've written many sections detailing the possible and expected side effects of these gene care "vaccines." If all of this is new to you, consider re-examine "How COVID-1 9 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System, " "Seniors Dying After COVID Vaccine Labeled as Natural Causes" and "Side Effects and Data Gaps Raise Questions on COVID Vaccine."

The take-home message here is that these infusions are not inoculations. They is not avoid illnes, they do not render you immune and they do not prevent communication of the disease. Instead, they modify your genetic coding, turning you into a viral protein factory that has no off-switch. What's happening here is a medical hoax of unprecedented importance, and it really needs to be stopped before it's too late for a majority of people.

If you already got the vaccine and now regret it, you may be able to address your symptoms squandering the same programmes you'd use to treat actual SARS-CoV-2 infection. I discussed these strategies at the end of "Why COVID Vaccine Testing Is a Farce."

Last but not least, if you got the vaccine and are having side effects, please help raise public awareness by reporting it. The Children's Health Defense is calling on all who have suffered a side effect from a COVID-1 9 inoculation to do these three things: 28

If you live in the U.S ., file a report on VAERS

Report the harm on VaxxTracker.com, which is a nongovernmental adverse event tracker( you can file anonymously if you like)

Report the gash on the CHD website

Read more: articles.mercola.com