Dalelorenzo's GDI Blog

Democrats unveil earmarks revival plan

House Grant Chair Rosa DeLauro( D-Conn .) discovered a long-awaited proposal on Friday to restore earmarks, including major changes aimed at building bipartisan support.

Democrats are rebranding earmarks as “Community Project Funding, “ detailing a plan to tuck cash into annual spend proposals that would benefit specific projects, rather than the current practice of countenancing agencies to decide where the money will ultimately flow. The renovation is an attempt to break from the politically taboo reputation of earmarks as wasteful and reticent “pork-barrel“ spending. It could also furnish positive incentives for members of both parties to support the next major fund administer, since lawmakers could make recognition for the purpose of obtaining funding for their neighborhoods.

“Community Project Funding is a critical reform that will see Congress more responsive to the people, ” DeLauro( D-Conn .) said during the following statement. “Our bipartisan reforms will induce a small number of projects with strong parish foundation, a transparent process where no member’s family can benefit and where programmes are audited to ensure coin was devoted as planned.”

DeLauro said the revamp includes covering the overall amount of money spent on earmarks to 1 percent of discretionary spending and allowing lawmakers to submit no more than 10 activity petitions.

All solicits would be posted online, lawmakers and their immediate families can’t have a financial stake in the requests and funds can’t flow to for-profit recipients, DeLauro said. A federal watchdog will periodically examine a sampling of earmarks, and members must justify any such requests with evidence from their communities.

The Senate is separately working out a plan to restore earmarks.

“I have always believed that members of Congress have a better understanding of their communities than Washington bureaucrats, ” Senate Appropriation Chair Patrick Leahy( D-Vt .) said during the following statement. “We are in good faith negotiations with the House and my Senate colleagues to bring back Congressionally addrest spending in a transparent and responsible way, and those discussions are ongoing. I believe there is bipartisan support to restore the power of the purse to Congress and I am continuing to work toward that goal.”

DeLauro’s announcement comes after House Democrats studied a plan for overhauling earmarks last year but ultimately postponed their own efforts. The overture at the time inspired concern among some of the most electorally endangered rookies, who feared Republican would use earmarks as fodder for remorseless strike ads on the campaign trail.

The issue has so far divided House Republicans, with members of the House Freedom Caucus taking a hard line against delivering back earmarks, while other GOP lawmakers have been open to reform and gaining some spend influence over the Biden administration. The fiscally conservative Republican Study Committee plans to meet next week to debate the issue.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer pledged last week that the return of earmarks would be bipartisan. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has said he would review Democrats’ proposal when it is secreted and speak with his party about it.

"Steny has talked to me. He was just talking to me last Congress. He talked to me this Congress, ” McCarthy said at his news conference on Friday. “If he wants to propose something, I will look at it. But ... it can't be what was around here before. There's got to be accountability.“

Senate Republicans have been slightly more approachable to restoring the special spend plan. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has said he would defer to Sen. Richard Shelby( R-Ala .), the top Republican on the Senate Appropriation Committee.

"I'm not against earmarks, " Shelby said. "I'm against bad, foolish earmarks."

Melanie Zanona contributed to this report.

Read more: politico.com


Trump endorses primary rival challenging Republican impeachment supporter

Former President Donald Trump is weighing in for the first time on behalf of a primary challenger defending one of the 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach him in January.

Trump on Friday afternoon cast his support to Max Miller, a onetime White House aide who launched a campaign against Rep. Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio earlier Friday. Gonzalez, a second-term congressman and onetime professional football musician, said Trump didn’t do enough to quell the Jan. 6 Capitol riot when is in favour of onetime president’s impeachment a week later.

“Current Rep. Anthony Gonzalez should not be representing the people of the 16 th District because he does not represent their interest or their stomach, ” Trump said in a statement. “Max Miller has my Complete and Total Endorsement! ”

Miller, a 32 -year-old Marine reservist, is a Trump loyalist who worked on the onetime president’s 2016 expedition before invited to participate in the White House, first in the office of personnel and later as chairman of betterment. During the 2020 reelection campaign, he sufficed as lieutenant safarus director for presidential business. Miller, who greets from a foremost northeastern Ohio family, recently acquired a home in Rocky River, inside Gonzalez’s district.

Miller has made clear that he plans to turn Gonzalez’s impeachment vote into a centerpiece of his expedition, writing on Twitter that the congressman “betrayed” constituents with his vote.

Trump has told advisers that he’s intent on unseating the Republicans who backed his impeachment and others in the party he examines as faithless, including Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, whom he has accused of not doing enough to intervene in the state’s 2020 referendum counting. The former president huddled with political consultants at his Mar-a-Lago estate Thursday to discuss his political contrives, including how he plans to weigh in on 2022 races.

Trump has already endorsed several nominees in next year’s referendums, including former White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who is running for head of Arkansas, and Kansas Sen. Jerry Moran.

The former president will be able to drop substantial fund into these scoots. He has established a leadership PAC with tens of millions of dollars that could be spent on ads or doled out to campaigns he corroborates. He has begun laying out plans to start a super PAC, which would be able to invest unlimited amounts of money on advertising.

Miller connects an increasingly long index of onetime Trump aide-de-camps who are either endeavouring part or weighing potential dictations. In addition to Sanders, former envoy to Slovenia Lynda Blanchard has propelled a campaign for Alabama’s open Senate seat. Cliff Sims, another former Trump aide, is seriously considering entering the Alabama race, and former safarus adviser Katrina Pierson is a potential candidate for a special House election in Texas.

Gonzalez has stood by his impeachment vote, saying in a recent appearance on a republican podcast that during the Jan. 6 Capitol uprising, “the president didn’t step up in my opinion in nearly the right way, to stop it.”

“You have to love your country and you have to adhere to your expletive more strongly than you do your work, and I don't know what political demise will play out, ” Gonzalez said. “If my fate is ultimately that I don't get to come back, I will do that at peace.”

Read more: politico.com


House Dem Who Voted Against $1.9 Trillion Stimulus Says Process Should Have Involved Republicans

Congressman Jared Golden( D-ME) criticized the $1.9 trillion stimulus statute that was passed in the House early Saturday morning and used to call more bipartisanship in Washington, a move that comes little than 24 hours after he was one of two Democrats to vote against President Joe Biden's firstly major legislative initiative.

In an interrogation with The Hill on Saturday after the House vote, Golden argued that the $1.9 trillion stimulus wasn’t sufficiently targeted, and suggested that Democrats should have sought GOP support for it. “I like to often remind myself that time because you can do something doesn't mean that you are able to. It doesn't mean that it's in the best interest of the country, ” said Golden.

“I guess I would say that I don't think it was in the best interest of the country. I think that we have ended up with worse public policy as a result, rather than a more targeted bill that would come out of a bipartisan process, ” he said.

The stimulus bill would furnish $200 billion for public schools, $50 billion for COVID-1 9 vaccination rationing, contact retracing, and testing, and expand the weekly unemployment booster checks at $400 -- instead of $ 300 -- until the end of August of 2021. The statute would also provide a $1,400 stimulus fee to individuals who earn less than $75,000 per year, and would afford $350 billion for commonwealths, local governments, and tribal governments.

Among Golden's criticisms were that the statement included funding for priorities that have already been funded through previous legislation, including “billions and billions”of dollars that have “yet to hit their own economies, ” reports The Hill. And by not targeting, advocated Golden, lawmakers were spending money that could have been used for other priorities.

“We need to get more and more targeted as we move forward here so that we have...the resources we need for other critical reforms that the American beings too need us to step up and get done, ” said Golden.

The final House vote was 219 -2 12. One other Democrat, Congressman Kurt Schrader of Oregon, also voted against the invoice. It will likely still be amended in the Senate, partly because Democrat included a provision to increase the minimum wages to $15 per hour that the Senate parliamentarian previously said did not comport with the Senate rules.

Golden was also critical of the Senate passing the bill through the reconciliation process, the most process the rules of which is necessary Democrats to axe the $15 minimum wage hike in the House-passed bill. Under the reconciliation process, the Senate can surpass legislation with a veto-proof simple majority, but the legislation has to follow highly specific and complex powers related to the budget.

While Democrat do have the votes to pass the stimulus invoice without any GOP support if Vice President Kamala Harris performs as a tie-breaker, Democrat can't risk a single defection in the Senate in order to determine that happen.

" I considered that we also have to accept the fact that we are going to have to work with the Republican Party and that is the mandate that was delivered by voters across 50 countries ," Golden told The Hill." And there's only so many times you can do budget reconciliation ."

Golden likewise points out that Democrats having surpassed the stimulus statement without GOP support could turn off Republican lawmakers from working with them in the future." It poisoned the shaft a little bit so to speak ," he said.

Related: Democrat-Controlled House Passes $ 1.9 Trillion Stimulus Bill; Two Dems Vote Against It

The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing republican media companies and counter-cultural shops for information, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.

Read more: dailywire.com