Dalelorenzo's GDI Blog
1Apr/210

COVID-19 Vaccines Likened to ‘Software Updates’ for Your Body

I've discussed why COVID-1 9 vaccines are in fact gene regimen and not inoculations in several previous articles, including "COVID-1 9 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines, " "COVID-1 9 'Vaccines' Are Gene Therapy" and "How COVID-1 9 'Vaccines' May Destroy the Lives of Millions."

However, despite being a recognized form of gene care since its inception, inoculation makers are now madly trying to deny that this mRNA technology is gene care. One rationale for this, suggested by David Martin, Ph.D ., 1 are likely to be because as long as they're considered "vaccines, " they will be shielded from obligation.

Experimental gene therapies is not have monetary indebtednes shielding from the government, but pandemic inoculations do, even in the experimental stage, as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect. Another ground might be because they fear parties won't line up for experimental gene care. It has a very different connotation in people's minds( as it should ).

A third possible is that they know full well that you cannot, ethically, mandate gene therapy in the way you can mandate vaccines. Mandatory public health quantify mandates are generally based on the idea that it's acceptable for some individuals to be harmed as long as the measure advantages the collective.

Well, the COVID-1 9 "vaccines" are only designed to lessen symptoms of COVID-1 9. They do not prevent infection or spread, and since the inoculated individual is the only one receiving a potential benefit, "the greater good" argument dies apart.

Who knows, there may be other factors at performance that we've not realized as of yet, but whatever the reason, they genuinely do not demand you to think of these doses as gene care. They require you to accept them as any other conventional vaccine.

mRN-ABased Medicines Designed to Not Irreversibly Alter DNA

Try as they are likely, though, they cannot get rid of mRNA's gene therapy label. For starters, Moderna describes its product as "gene therapy technology" in its SEC filings. On sheet 70, they too supply the following: 2

"Currently, mRNA is considered a gene regiman make by the FDA. Unlike specific gene regimen that irreversibly alter cadre DNA and could act as a source of side effects, mRN-Abased medications are are in place to not irreversibly vary cell DNA; nonetheless, side effects observed in gene care could negatively impact the insight of mRNA medicines despite variations in mechanism."

In other utterances, it's a assemble of gene care, but one that doesn't enter and permanently alter your actual DNA. Instead, the mRNA is still in the cellular fluid where ribosomes predict the code and start the protein per the mRNA's coding.

The difference between vaccine mRNA and your natural mRNA is that your natural mRNA resides in the nucleus of the cadre where your cellular DNA resides -- it can be likened to a overturn reproduction of your DNA -- and exits the nucleus when a protein needs to be made.

This is in stark contrast to mRNA from inoculations, which is synthetic and enrolls the cell from the outside and is not are in place to penetrate the nucleus. Additionally, your own mRNA is rapidly cheapened by enzymes, but the one from the inoculation is protected in a liposome that will protect it from degeneration and keep on producing spike proteins. How long? No one knows because it has never been tested.

Can Vaccine mRNA Reverse-Transcribe Into Genome?

However, some doctors still worry that mRNA doses might be able to reverse-transcribe into your genes and modify your DNA on a permanent basis. One is Dr. Richard Urso, an ophthalmologist, who shared his concerns on a December 2020 occurrence of The Shepard Ambellas Show. 3,4

He claimed the mRNA of retroviruses( which are part of our genome) have been shown to have the ability to transcribe into your DNA, and if it can do that, vaccine mRNA might be able to do this as well. According to Urso, if this turns out to be correct, the upshot of mRNA vaccination might be lifelong COVID-1 9.

A new study by MIT and Harvard scientists demonstrates that some part of the RNA from the coronavirus itself are most likely becoming a permanent fixture in human DNA. This was immediately saw nearly impossible, for the same reasons which are presented to assure us that an RNA vaccine could reach no such stunt.~ Dr. Doug Corrigan

Another skeptic is Dr. Doug Corrigan, who in a March 16, 2021, blog reviewed the findings of recent research5, 6 expres SARS-CoV-2 RNA can reverse-transcribe into the human genome: 7

"In my previous blog, 'Will an RNA Vaccine Permanently Alter My DNA? '8 I laid down by several molecular pathways that would potentially enable the RNA in an mRNA vaccine to be simulated and permanently being incorporated into your DNA.

I was absolutely not surprised to find that the majority of beings claimed that this prospect was impossible ... After all, we've been told in no uncertain terms that it would be impossible for the mRNA in a inoculation to become integrated into our DNA, simply because 'RNA doesn't work that way.'

Well, this current research which was exhausted not too long after my original clause demonstrates that yes, surely, 'RNA does work that way' ... Specifically, a new study9, 10 by MIT and Harvard scientists demonstrates that some part of the RNA from the coronavirus itself are most likely becoming a permanent fixture in human DNA.

This was once felt nearly impossible, for the same reasons which are presented to assure us that an RNA vaccine could achieve no such accomplishment. Against the tides of current biological dogma, these researchers found that the genetic segments of this RNA virus are more than likely making their way into our genome.

They also found that the exact pathway that I are set forth in in my original clause is more than likely the pathway being used( retrotransposon, and including a LINE-1 ingredient) for this retro-integration to occur.

And, unlike my previous blog where I hypothesize that such an manifestation would be extremely rare( chiefly because I was attempting to temper beliefs more conservatively because of the absence of empirical proof ), it appears that this integration of viral RNA segments into our DNA is not as rare as I initially hypothesized ...

To be fair, this study didn't show that the RNA from the present vaccines is being integrated into our DNA. However, they did establish, relatively convincingly, that there exists a viable cellular pathway whereby snippets of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA could become being incorporated into our genomic DNA. In my view, more study is needed to both corroborate these sees, and to close some gaps."

A January 2020 Phys.org clause, 11 "Modified RNA Has a Direct Effect on DNA, " also notes that "it has now been discovered that RNA has a direct effect on DNA stability, " and this too may or may not play a role in mRNA therapy for COVID-1 9.

Vaccine Makers Fear Negative Perception of Gene Therapy

Getting back to Moderna's SEC filing, in it, they likewise be recognized that public taste of other types of gene therapy may negatively impact perception of mRNA medications. The trouble, they admit, is that irreversible gene cares have side effects, and knowing this, people might spurn mRNA remedies extremely. The SEC filing goes on to note: 12

"Because no product in which mRNA is the primary active ingredient has been approved, the regulatory pathway for admiration is uncertain. The amount and pattern of the clinical inquiries and preclinical studies needed for the approved by these types of medicines have not been established, is different from those required for gene rehabilitation produces, or may be needed security testing like gene regiman products."

Well, the pandemic enabled them to sneak mRNA gene rehabilitation for the purposes of the proverbial radar so that they don't have to conduct more stringent gene therapy safe testing. Instead, they only sided the global population for the largest testing imaginable, and all without drawback when something goes wrong -- specified it's viewed as a "vaccine, " that is.

mRNA Rehabilitations Classified as Gene Therapy in Europe and US

The SEC filing1 3 for BioNTech( BioNTech's mRNA technology is used in the Pfizer vaccine) is equally clear, territory on sheet 21: "Although we expect to submit BLAs for our mRN-Abased make candidates in the United State, and in the The european institutions, mRNA regimen have been classified as gene therapy medicinal products, other districts may be regarded our mRN-Abased product nominees to be new stimulants, not biologics or gene rehabilitation medicinal products, and involve different marketing applications."

So, in the U.S. and Europe, mRNA regimen, as a group, are classified as "gene therapy medicinal products." The crux now, again, appears to be the idea that mRNA therapy does not motive permanent DNA modifications. On page 35 of the BioNTech SEC filing, they to clarify the alleged discrepancies between other, irreparable, gene regimen and mRNA gene regiman 😛 TAGEND

"There have been few permissions of gene therapy products in the United States and other jurisdictions, and there have been well-reported significant adverse events are connected with their testing and use.

Gene therapy produces have the effects of feeing brand-new DNA and potentially irreversibly deepening the DNA in a cadre. In differ, mRNA is highly unlikely to localize to the nucleus, integrate into cadre DNA, or otherwise make any permanent changes to cell DNA.

Consequently, we expect that our commodity campaigners will have a different possible side effects chart from gene cares because there is a shortage of probabilities are connected with adjusting cadre DNA irreversibly."

Hacking the Software of Life

Company executives and scientists familiar with mRNA technology have, for years, been referring to this new technology as gene therapy. The video above aspects a TED Talk by Dr. Tal Zaks, leader medical officer of Moderna, given in 2017, more than two full years before COVID-1 9.

In it, he notes that they only, at that time, already working on a variety of vaccines, including an mRNA vaccine for influenza and individualized cancer vaccines based on the genetic cycle of the patient's tumor, stressing that this vaccine would not act like any previous inoculation ever appointed.

"We've been living this remarkable digital technical change, and I'm here today to tell you that we are actually hacking the software of life, and that it's changing the path we think about prevention and treatment of cancer, " Zaks said.

"In every cadre there's this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short-lived, that moves the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we're all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what the cell will actually do. So, we think of it as an operating arrangement ...

So, if you could change that ... if you could initiate a line of system, or conversion a line of system, it turns out that has profound connections for everything, from the influenza to cancer ...

Imagine if instead of giving[ individual patients] the protein of a virus, we granted them the instructions on how to compile the protein, how their own bodies can make its own vaccine, " he said.

How mRNA Vaccines Work

Zaks further differentiates conventional vaccines and mRNA vaccines by explain that when using a conventional inoculation, you have viral protein floating around outside the cell, whereas the mRNA approach reprograms the cell to create that viral protein inside of itself.

"What's more alarming? " he expects. "A stranger prowling the neighborhood, or somebody who exactly broke into your first floor and jaunted alarm systems? That's what happens with an mRNA inoculation. You've tripped the alarm wire and now the cadre is phoning 911, it's calling the police -- at the same time that it's utter the protein, saying 'That's the bad guy.' That's how an mRNA vaccine works."

Zaks likewise refers to the company's mRNA shots as "information therapy, " which is just another way of saying gene care because mRNA is a carrier of genetic code.( For clarification, code in your natural mRNA coincides your DNA, whereas inoculation mRNA has no equivalence inside your genome since it's coming from the outside. Vaccine mRNA still carries "genetic code, " though, only not anything found in your body before .) As explained on genome.gov: 14

"Messenger RNA( mRNA) is a single-stranded RNA molecule that is complementary to one of the DNA strands of a gene. The mRNA is an RNA version of the gene that needles the cell nucleus and moves to the cytoplasm where proteins are induce.

During protein synthesis, an organelle called a ribosome moves along the mRNA, reads its base cycle, and uses the genetic code to translate each three-base triplet, or codon, into its corresponding amino acid.

mRNA, are one of the different types of RNA the hell is found in the cell. This specific one, like most RNAs, are made in the nucleus and then exported to the cytoplasm where the rendition system, the machine who really shapes proteins, fixes to these mRNA molecules and predicts the system on the mRNA to make a specific protein.

So in general, one gene, the DNA for one gene, can be transcribed into an mRNA molecule that will end up making one specific protein."

mRNA Technology Ushers in Transhumanism

In genuine technocratic, transhumanist Fourth Industrial Revolution fashion, Zaks and other mRNA pushers end the body as your equipment, your genetic code as software and these mRNA insertions as software updates. As noted by Patrick Wood in a recent Technocracy News article: 15

"Pure and simple, this is unvarnished, raw transhumanism ... Scientists believe that they can rewrite the genetic code[ his messages , not mine, for all you out there who still don't guess these mRNA vaccines change the genetic code exactly because some 'fact checker' says they don't ], concluding they can improve on a person's God-given genetic makeup is entering perilous territory ...

These scientists rightfully believe that the human person is nothing more than a machine that can be spoofed into and reordered according to some programmer's teaches ... Who's to say they won't correct one problem and appoint something so bad? "

What Is Transhumanism?

What precisely is transhumanism? Technocracy News describes1 6 it as "a changed doctrine that believes in the use of high technology to convert humen into immortal beings ... Furthermore, they seek to use genetic engineering to create a brand-new captain race of kinds, that are able to molted all of the 'unseemly' characteristics of humans." Britannica defines1 7 it as a 😛 TAGEND

" ... social and theoretical motion devoted to promoting the research and development of robust human-enhancement engineerings. Such engineerings would augment or increase human sensory receipt, emotive ability, or cognitive capability as well as radically improve human health and lengthen human life spans.

Such modifications ensuing from the additive of biological or physical engineerings would be more or less permanent and integrated into the human body."

Great Reset Is a Transhumanist Agenda

Miklos Lukacs de Pereny, investigate prof of science and technology policy at the Peruvian University San Martin de Porres, has given presentations1 8 and interviews1 9 in which he warned that transhumanism are an integral component of the Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution agendas, which are being rolled out at a furious speed under the auspices of the COVID-1 9 pandemic. As reported by Life Site News, November 10, 2020:20

"The COVID-1 9 pandemic was manufactured by the world's elites as part of a are projected to globally betterment 'transhumanism' -- literally, the synthesi of human beings with engineering in an attempt to alter human nature itself and create a superhuman being and an 'earthly paradise, ' distributed according to a Peruvian academic and professional in technology.

This dystopian nightmare scenario is no longer the stuff of science fiction, but an integral part of the proposed post-pandemic 'Great Reset, ' Dr. Miklos Lukacs de Pereny said at a recent summit on COVID-1 9.

Indeed, to the fullest extent that implementing the transhumanist agenda is possible, it requires the absorption of political and financial supremacy in the entrusts of a world-wide society and the dependence of beings on the mood, said Lukacs.

That's accurately the aim of the Great Reset, promoted by German economist Klaus Schwab, CEO and founder of World Economic Forum, along with billionaire 'philanthropists' George Soros and Bill Gates and other owneds, directors, and stockholders of Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Finance who convene at the WEF withdraws at Davos, Switzerland, battled Lukacs.

Transhumanists ... seek to 'relativize the human being' and 'turn it into a putty that can be modified or molded to our preference and our desire and by reject those limits nature or God have placed on us' ...

Indeed, WEF's Schwab has been promoting the Great Reset as a style to 'harness the Fourth Industrial Revolution' ... which, he declared in January 2016, 'will affect the very essence of our human experience.' Schwab described the Fourth Industrial Revolution then as 'a synthesi of technologies that is blurring the lines among the physical, digital and biological spheres' ...

Those technologies include genetic engineering such as CRISPR genetic editing, neural networks( A.I .), robotics, the Internet of Things( IoT ), 3D printing, and quantum computing. 'The Fourth Industrial Revolution is nothing other than the implementation of transhumanism on a global level, ' emphasized Lukacs."

mRNA Technology Is Still Gene Therapy

In "COVID-1 9 'Vaccines' Are Gene Therapy"( hyperlinked above ), I accommodate even more background information demonstrating that mRNA "vaccines" are in fact gene care, and how this technology has been considered and presented as gene therapy in the past.

The fact is, everywhere you look, mRNA technology, mRNA therapy and mRNA remedies -- anything mRNA -- have been, for years, treated as a shape of gene regiman. Take the 2015 paper2 1 "mRNA: Fulfilling the Promise of Gene Therapy" in the magazine Molecular Therapy. In this paper, the authors point out that in vitro-transcribed mRNA has the potential to play a role in gene regiman previously simply foreseen for DNA.

Back in 2009, the paper2 2 "Current Prospects for mRNA Gene Delivery" in the European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics noted that while "replication-deficient viruses have been used most successfully in the field of gene therapy ... mRNA has ... developed as an beautiful and promising alternative in the nonviral gene delivery battleground, " and a 2019 paper2 3 in Frontiers in Oncology discussed the therapeutic prospects of "mRN-Abased gene therapy for glioblastoma."

If they want to call it "temporary gene therapy, " I'm OK with that -- catered they can prove that it is in fact temporary, how long the effects last-place, and that vaccine mRNA cannot reverse-transcribe into the human genome like SARS-CoV-2 RNA apparently can.

But to deny that it's gene therapy absolutely and insist that it's simply an informed way of vaccine technology is simply impossible, as it does not play-act any of terms of reference of an actual vaccine( i.e ., foreclose infection and spread ).

Do You Want to Update Your Software?

Now, if our genetic makeup is to be viewed as "the software of life, " as Zaks introduces it, then should we not have the sole authority to decide for ourselves whether we actually want a "software update, " be it temporary or permanent?

"If we truly live in a free society, wouldn't it stand to reason that we would want to have an industrious debate over how to answer that question? " Wood requests. 24

"Contrary to what some scientists guess, we can not simply machines. We are human beings with forms, spirits and free wills. Anyone who tries to mandate the acceptance of an experimental gene-altering treatment is going against the international Nuremberg Codes, which require informed consent of any experimental treatment."

What to Do if You've Had a Change of Heart

If you already got the vaccine and now regret it, you are allowed to to address your evidences expending the same strategies you'd use to treat actual SARS-CoV-2 infection. I refreshed these strategies at the end of "Why COVID Vaccine Testing Is a Farce."

Last but not least, if you got the vaccine and are having side effects, please help raise public awareness by reporting it. The Children's Health Defense is calling on all who have suffered a side effect from a COVID-1 9 vaccine to do these three things: 25

If "youre living in" the U.S ., file a report on VAERS

Report the harm on VaxxTracker.com, which is a nongovernmental adverse event tracker( you can file anonymously if you like)

Report the injury on the CHD website

Read more: articles.mercola.com

17Mar/210

COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Are Gene Therapy

As calls for obligatory COVID-1 9 vaccination grow various regions of the world, it's becomes increasingly crucial to understand what these insertions actually are. The mRNA "vaccines" created by Moderna and Pfizer are in fact gene cares.

As I'll explain below, there's simply no way around this, and drug manufacturers and public health officials must be made to admit this point. Why? Because it makes all the divergence in the world. You cannot mandate a gene therapy against COVID-1 9 any more than you can force entire populations to undergo gene therapy for a cancer they do not have and may never be at risk for.

Interestingly enough, mainstream media, knowledge checkers and various manufacture front groups hold the gene regiman assert is bogus, even though every single detail about the vaccines screams otherwise. Why are they spreading this disinformation? Why do they not want you to know what these injections actually are?

In short, they know labeling them as "gene therapies" would be like slapping a skull and crossbones label on them. Most parties have enough common sense have discovered that gene therapy is a different ballgame from a regular vaccination, and might be a bad thought, especially for children and younger someones.

mRNA 'Vaccines' Fulfill None of the Criteria for a Vaccine

To start, let's take a look at some basic definitions of words. Harmonizing to the U.S. Cores for Disease Control and Prevention, a inoculation is: 1

"A product that animates a person's immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease."

Immunity, in turn, is defined as:

"Protection from an infectious disease, " meaning that "If "youre ever" immune to an illness, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected."

That's the medical explanation. The legal explanation, in the few cases where it has been detailed, is equally unequivocal:

Iowa code2 -- "Vaccine wants a specially developed antigen dispensed to person or persons for the purpose of providing immunity."

Washington state code3, 4 -- "Vaccine necessitates a been prepared by a killed or attenuated living micro-organism, or fraction thereof ... " The statute too specifies that a vaccine "upon immunization induces exemption that protects us against infection ... "

These clarities, both medical and law, present problems for mRNA "vaccines, " since 😛 TAGEND

mRNA infusions do not impart immunity. Moderna and Pfizer both be recognized that their clinical troubles aren't even looking at immunity. As such they is not fulfill the medical and/ or legal interpretation of a vaccine.

They do not impede transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection. As such they do not fulfill the medical and/ or law explanation of a vaccine.

Dictionaries Attempt to Rewrite Medical Terms

We should not be fooled by attempts to condition the public to accept redefined words. As of February 2019, Merriam-Webster defined5 "vaccine" as "a preparation of killed microbes, living attenuated organisms, or living fully venomous creatures that is administered to produce or artificially increase exemption to a particular disease." By February 26, 2021, the government has informed the definition of "vaccine" to: 6

"A preparation that is administered( as by injection) to stimulate the body's immune response against a particular contagious diseases 😛 TAGEND

a: an antigenic preparation of a often inactivated or attenuated ... pathogenic negotiator( such as a bacterium or virus) or one of its components or makes( such as a protein or toxin)

b: a preparation of genetic fabric( such as a rope of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic essence( such as a fragment of virus spike protein) "

Let's be clear. Merriam-Webster does not dictate medical jargon. It can be used, nonetheless, to confound beings. For now, all medical dictionaries still show the traditional explanation of vaccine, 7 as Merriam-Webster did up until this year. That said, I would not be surprised if modifies are prepare there as well, eventually, if the misrepresentation of COVID-1 9 mRNA inoculations is allowed to stand.

mRNA Therapy Doesn't Satisfy Public Health Measure Directive

There's also the issue of whether a gene regiman is likely to be mandated, and you are able to hinge on it being accepted as a inoculation. The 1905 Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts8 essentially fixed that collective benefit supersedes individual benefit.

Since mRNA rehabilitations do not interpret the immunized party immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective help that annuls individual jeopardy, and therefore cannot be mandated.

Put another way, the decision quarrels( although legal expert diverge on some of the finer detailed description of its interpretation) that it's acceptable for some individuals to be harmed by a public health directive as long as it benefits the collective. Nonetheless, if vaccination is a public health measure meant to protect and benefit the collective, then it would need to accomplish two things 😛 TAGEND

Ensure that the vaccinated person is rendered immune from the disease.

Inhibit transmission of the disease from the vaccinated person to other characters.

We're now back to the original question that mRNA regimen for COVID-1 9 do not accomplish either of these things. Since these gene therapies do not render the person immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective advantage that usurps individual threat.

On the contrary, the only one benefiting from an mRNA "vaccine" is the individual receiving the gene therapy, since all they are designed to do is minimize clinical indications are connected with the S-1 spike protein.

In other utterances, they won't retain you from going sick with SARS-CoV-2; they just expected to minimize your illnes symptoms if or when you do get infected. So, coming inoculated protects no one but yourself. Since you're the only one who will collect a benefit( less severe COVID-1 9 evidences upon illnes ), the justification to accept the risks of the care "for the greater good" of your community is blatantly irrational.

Sell mRNA Therapy as Vaccine Violates Federal Law

Since mRNA "vaccines" do not match the medical and/ or law description of a vaccine, directing to them as inoculations, and commerce them as such, is a deceitful practice that violates9 15 U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 10 the existing legislation that decides advertising of medical practises.

The lack of accomplished human tribulations too keeps these mRNA produces at odds with 15 U.S. Code Section 41. Per this law, 11,12 it is unlawful to advertise "that a product or service can thwart, consider, or medication human malady unless you own skillful and reliable technical manifestation, including, where needed, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the amount claimed are true at the time they are made."

Here's the problem: The primary end point in the COVID-1 9 "vaccine" troubles does not constitute an actual inoculation inquiry end point because, again, vaccine visitation end point have to do with immunity and dissemination reduction. Neither of those was measured.

What's more, key secondary end points in Moderna's trial include prevention of severe COVID-1 9 canker( defined as need for hospitalization) and prevention of illnes by SARS-CoV-2, irrespective of symptoms. 13,14 However, Moderna did not actually measurement charge of infection, stating that it was too "impractical" to do so.

That conveys there's no evidence of this gene therapy having an impact on infection, for better or worse. And, if you have no evidence, you cannot fulfill the U.S. Code requirement that states you must have "competent and reliable scientific attest ... substantiating that the amount claimed are true."

Making materials worse, both Pfizer and Moderna are now eliminating their control radicals by offering the real vaccine to any and all placebo recipients who are interested it. 15 The studies are supposed to go on for a full two years, but by eliminating the domination group, judging the efficiency and jeopardies is going to be near absurd.

What Makes COVID Vaccines Gene Therapy?

Alright. Let's move on to the definition of "gene therapy." As detailed on MedlinePlus.gov's "What Is Gene Therapy" page: 16

"Gene care is an experimental procedure that uses genes to treat or thwart ailment ... Researchers are researching several comings to gene care, including: ... Introducing a brand-new gene into the body to help fight a disease ...

Although gene regiman is a promising treatment alternative for a number of ailments( including inherited disorders, some types of cancer, and sure-fire viral infections ), the technique remains risky and is still under study to make sure that it will be safe and efficient. Gene therapy is currently being tested simply for diseases that have no other cures."

Here, it's importance noting that there are many different treatments that have been shown to be very effective against COVID-1 9, it is therefore certainly does not qualify as an illness that has no cure. It realise sense that gene therapy should be restricted to fatal cancers, as this is the only time that making drastic perils might be warranted. That said, here's how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines gene therapy: 17

"Human gene therapy strives to modify or operate the showing of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cadres for therapeutic abuse. Gene therapy is a technique that revises a person's genes to treat or medication cancer. Gene cares can manipulate by various mechanisms 😛 TAGEND

* Superseding a disease-causing gene with a healthy imitation of the gene

* Inactivating a disease-causing gene that is not functioning properly

* Pioneering a new or modified gene into the body to help treat a disease"

November 17, 2020, the American Society of Gene+ Cell Therapy( ASGCT) announced "COVID-1 9 Vaccine Candidates Show Gene Therapy Is a Viable Strategy, " noting that: 18

"Two COVID-1 9 vaccine experiments, both of which use messenger RNA( or mRNA) engineering to teach the body to fight the virus, have reported efficacy over 90 percent.

These results, announced by Moderna on Nov. 16 and by Pfizer and its partner BioNTech on Nov. 9 ... demonstrate that gene care is a viable strategy for developing vaccines to combat COVID-1 9.

Both vaccine candidates use mRNA to platform a person's cadres to make countless two copies of a fragment of the virus. The fragment then provokes the immune organization to attack if the real virus tries to invade the body."

mRNA Deliver New Genetic Instructions

As explained in the ASGCT's video above, mRNA are molecules that contain genetic teaches for establishing numerous proteins. mRNA "vaccines" deliver a synthetic form of mRNA into your cadres that carry the instruction to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the antigen, that then activates your immune structure to produce antibodies. Then there's Moderna's tribulation website, 19 where they describe their technology thus 😛 TAGEND

"Typical inoculations for viruses are made from a diminished or inactive virus, but mRN-A1 273 is not made from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It is made from messenger ribonucleic battery-acid( mRNA ), a genetic code that tells cells how to clear protein, which assistant the body's immune system make antibodies to fight the virus."

November 18, 2020, Wired magazine made a big deal about COVID-1 9 vaccines being "genetic vaccines, " mention: 20

"The active ingredient inside their shot is mRNA -- portable cords of genetic code that contain the ideas for proteins. Cells use mRNA to get those specs out of hard-bitten DNA storage and into their protein-making mills. The mRNA inside Pfizer and BioNTech's vaccine targets any cadres it contacts to run a coronavirus spike-building program."

Importantly, as reported by David Martin, Ph.D ., 21,22 "Moderna ... describes its concoction not as a inoculation, but as 'gene care technology' in SEC filings. This is because neither Moderna nor Pfizer ... stimulate any affirms about their commodities procreating exemption or frustrating transmission." Additionally, Moderna's SEC filings solely state that "Currently, mRNA is considered a gene rehabilitation make by the FDA, " as well. 23

mRNA Is 'Proven Form of Gene Therapy'

In a February 2021 essay, MIT Technology Review reviewed the history of mRNA technology in general, and Moderna's in particular, stating: 24

"Vaccines were not their focus. At the company's founding in 2010, its leaders imagined they might be able to use RNA to replace the introduced proteins that even up most of the biotech pharmacopoeia, virtually inducing dopes inside the patient's own cadres from an RNA blueprint. 'We were requesting, could we turn a human into a bioreactor? ' says Noubar Afeyan, the company's cofounder ... "

Bloomberg, in August 2020, reported2 5 that the Moderna vaccine would seek to transform your organization into "a vaccine-making machine." The New York Times was more to the level. In May 2020, they reported2 6 that "Researchers at two Harvard-affiliated hospitals are adapting a confirm use of gene therapy to develop a coronavirus vaccine." Read it again -- A established pattern of gene therapy.

So, to summarize: The definition of "genetic" is something relating to genes, and the definition of "therapy" is the medical treatment of a disease. The interpretation of "gene therapy" is the process of modifying or influencing the formulation of a gene, or adapting the biological dimensions of living cells.

mRNA are snippets of genetic code that advises cells to produce proteins. mRNA COVID-1 9 cares "deliver genetic instructions into your cadres, " thereby triggering your body to produce a fragment of the virus( the spike protein ). So, mRNA inoculations ARE gene care. There's simply no way around this. They fulfill all the definitions of gene therapy and nothing of the interpretations for a inoculation.

Defining 'COVID-1 9'

There's yet one more potential problem with the "COVID-1 9 vaccine" narrative as a whole, which Martin unpacked in a January 25, 2021, interview on the Wise Traditions podcast( above ). 27 In it, he clarifies 😛 TAGEND

"COVID-1 9 is not a disease. It consists of a series of clinical symptoms. It is a beings umbrella of things associated with what used to be associated with influenza and with other febrile diseases.

The problem that we have is that in February[ 2020 ], the World Health Organization was clear in stating that there should not be a conflation between[ SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-1 9 ]. One is a virus, in their definition, and one is a set of clinical symptoms. The impression in February was that SARS-CoV-2 caused COVID-1 9.

The problem with that explanation, and with the expectation, is that the majority of people who test positive exploiting the RT-PCR procedure for testing, for fragments of what is associated with SARS-CoV-2, are not ill at all. The illusion that the virus movements a disease came apart. That's the reason why they developed the term asymptomatic carrier."

In short-lived, SARS-CoV-2 has yet to be definitively proven to be the actual crusade of COVID-1 9. So, a gene regiman that teaches your form to produce a SARS-CoV-2 antigen -- the viral spike protein -- cannot even be touted as a preventative against COVID-1 9, as the two have not been shown to be causally associated.

"They have been willfully lying since the inception of this, " Martin says in the interrogation. "There is not a causal link between these things ... It has never even been close to established.

We have a situation where the impression of the problem is that people say, 'I don't want to get COVID-1 9. ' What they necessitate is they don't miss to get infected with a virus. The problem is those two things are not relevant to each other. A viral illnes hasn't been documented in the majority of "whats called" cases.

There is no basis for that conflation other than the manipulation of the public. That's the first half of the problem. The second half of the problem is that what is being touted as a vaccination ... is not a vaccine. This is gene therapy ...

What is this doing? It's sending a filament of synthetic RNA into the human being and is invoking within the human being, the creation of the S1 spike protein, which is a pathogen ... A vaccine is supposed to trigger immunity. It's not supposed to provoke you to make a toxin ...

It's not somewhat different. It's not the same at all ... It's not a vetoing infection. It's not a proscribing transmitting invention. It's a represents by which your torso is conscripted to realize the toxin that then, allegedly, your body somehow get worked to the handling of, but unlike a vaccine -- which is to trigger the immune response -- this is to trigger the creation of the toxin."

Why the Misrepresentation?

As of the reasons why narcotic fellowships are misrepresenting information and communication technologies, Martin supposes "it's done alone so that they can get themselves under the umbrella of public health laws that exploit vaccination."

Experimental gene therapies do not have monetary obligation shielding from the authority, but pandemic inoculations do, even in the experimental place, as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect. This is indeed a major incentive to make sure this technology is perceived as a inoculation and nothing else.

So, by maintaining the illusion that COVID-1 9 is a state of emergency, when in reality it is not, government leaders are providing cover for these gene regiman business so that they are insulated from any responsibility.

Experimental Gene Therapy Is a Bad Idea

I've written many sections detailing the possible and expected side effects of these gene care "vaccines." If all of this is new to you, consider re-examine "How COVID-1 9 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System, " "Seniors Dying After COVID Vaccine Labeled as Natural Causes" and "Side Effects and Data Gaps Raise Questions on COVID Vaccine."

The take-home message here is that these infusions are not inoculations. They is not avoid illnes, they do not render you immune and they do not prevent communication of the disease. Instead, they modify your genetic coding, turning you into a viral protein factory that has no off-switch. What's happening here is a medical hoax of unprecedented importance, and it really needs to be stopped before it's too late for a majority of people.

If you already got the vaccine and now regret it, you may be able to address your symptoms squandering the same programmes you'd use to treat actual SARS-CoV-2 infection. I discussed these strategies at the end of "Why COVID Vaccine Testing Is a Farce."

Last but not least, if you got the vaccine and are having side effects, please help raise public awareness by reporting it. The Children's Health Defense is calling on all who have suffered a side effect from a COVID-1 9 inoculation to do these three things: 28

If you live in the U.S ., file a report on VAERS

Report the harm on VaxxTracker.com, which is a nongovernmental adverse event tracker( you can file anonymously if you like)

Report the gash on the CHD website

Read more: articles.mercola.com