Dalelorenzo's GDI Blog

Mass Protests Can End Vaccine Passports

March 20, 2021, on the 1-year remembrance of the first COVID-1 9 lockdown, beings in more than 40 countries took to the streets to peacefully support against COVID-1 9 lies and inhuman amounts under the banner of “Worldwide Freedom Day.” While synced around the world that special epoch, expressions are more or less ongoing in various areas.

Peaceful Protests Are Ending Vaccine Passport Requirements

In the U.K ., Britons braced a “Unite for Freedom” rally in London, Saturday May 29, 2021, as seen in the short-lived video excerpt above. According to ITV.com, 1 hundreds of no-vaccine-passport demonstrators surged into the Westfield shopping mall in London, while another large multitude gathered in Parliament Square.

They were reportedly cleared from the plaza after about 20 minutes by police, but no one was injured or arrested in this particular instance.

As reported by Reuters2 May 30, 2021, it now looks like the U.K. will be scrapping its plan for vaccine passports as a reporting requirement for vast phenomena, although a government spokesman told Reuters that a final decision has yet to be made and that the COVID-1 9 inoculation certification inspect is now underway. Why the sudden change? Undoubtedly, it’s because Britons have repeatedly taken to the streets in complain of the medical apartheid these passports create.

14 US Commonwealth Have Banned Vaccine Passport Requirements

In the U.S ., there’s too good story. A number of states have enacted laws that proscription inoculation passport requirements in order to prevent the creation of a two-tier society of those with the freedom to live as they satisfy, and others whose souls would be restricted based on vaccination status alone.

As of May 28, 2021, the following entry 14 territories have banned inoculation passports from being involved: 3 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Wyoming.

Utah has issued a partial ban that applies to state government simply. Exclusively two states still further -- Hawaii and New York -- have actually implemented vaccine certification requirements for certain activities.

In Hawaii, only those with proof of vaccination are allowed to travel between provinces without pretravel testing and quarantine regulations, while New York requires you to be injected or have a recent negative COVID-1 9 exam to enter particular sports arena and gigantic operation venues.

Florida Fights to Make Cruise Lines Adhere to Law

In my home state of Florida, one of the best pro-freedom heads in the U.S ., Ron DeSantis, is now fighting the cruise industry over its proposed vaccination passport requirement. 4 The invoice he ratified into principle May 3, 2021,5 proscribes country authority from problem inoculation passports and private jobs from expecting proof of vaccination status to enter or secure services.

As such, sail strings that do business in Florida and want to restrict travel to vaccinated-only are in violation of this new anti-medical apartheid principle. As reported by NBC News: 6

“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention opened the go-ahead Wednesday to begin work toward restarting cruises for the first time in over a year after the massive sends became some of the first superspreader locations for the coronavirus ...

To comply with CDC guidance ... several cruise liners want to require nearly everyone onboard to be fully vaccinated. But that could now be illegal in Florida, the center of the American cruise industry, under a regulation DeSantis signed ... that restricts firms from discriminating against unvaccinated customers.

'In Florida, your personal choice seeing vaccinations will be protected, and no business or government entity will be able to deny you services based on your decision, ’ DeSantis said of the law, which codified ministerial lineups he had already issued.

The dispute may end up in court, as the cruise manufacture argues that the government statute doesn't apply to it thanks to federal principles. In the meantime, fellowships may decide to move ahead with plans to require vaccinations, even if it wants racking up abuses in Florida.”

A Social Ascribe Organization Is the Demise Goal of Vaccine Passports

It’s important to realize that vaccine passports or any other type of certification in and of themselves are not the end goal now. They’re simply a part of a much larger plan to implement a social ascribe organisation, such as that already implemented in China. First, they’d be expanded to cover other required vaccinations.

Ultimately, the vaccine passport will expand to include not just vaccination status but likewise other medical data, basic identification records, financial data and just about anything else that can be digitized and moved. The aspiration purpose is to end sovereignty as we know it, exploiting a social approval arrangement to ensure compliance.

Booster shots against COVID-1 9 discrepancies would logically come first, be accompanied by any number of other vaccinations. The sky’s the limit as far as that’s concerned, and numerous are likely to be gene-based and therefore dangerous in situations of extreme. Already, vaccine creators have announced they’re working on a compounding COVID-flu/ mRNA inoculation, 7 a pneumococcal-COVID/ mRNA booster shot for adults over 65,8 and mRNA/ seasonal influenza inoculations. 9

Ultimately, the inoculation passport will expand to include not just vaccination status but likewise other medical data, basic identification records, fiscal data and just about anything else that can be digitized and moved. It may even extend to include real-time biological data.

The end goal is to end freedom as we know it, use a social recognition plan aimed at ensuring respect. If you disobey or ordinance “out of line” with a dominating dictate, your democracy to travel, bank, browse, get a loan or even leave your residence "couldve been" hugely restricted.

We can see how such a system could operate by looking at the Chinese social approval system1 0 where behavior is electronically checked to assess “trustworthiness” in real-time. Aside from failing to pay taxes on time, score-lowering activities can include such minutia as cheating in an online video game, jaywalking , not inspecting your parents on a frequent-enough basis, smoking in a nonsmoking zone or treading your hound without a leash.

Momentary thoughtlessness can also land you on any one of hundreds of blacklists controlled by a variety of state authorities with their own jurisdictions, and if you end up on one, you’re commonly subject to blacklisting across all of them, at which point you won’t be allowed to do much of anything except work to improve your score. On average, it takes two to 5 year to get off a blacklist, and that’s assuming you comply with all the recommendations put forth. 11

While the Chinese social approval rating is still in its infancy, eventually, the hope is to use it to “search for signalings of potentially harmful behavior before it occurs”1 2 -- in other words, a real-world pre-crime type of situation as illustrated in the movie “Minority Report.” This is what vaccine passports can be achieved through, and there’s every reason to believe that is the plan.

As noted by Naomi Wolf, a former consultant to the Clinton administration, in an interview with Fox News’ Steve Hilton: 13,14

“I’m[ the] CEO of a tech firm, I is aware that these pulpits can do. It is not about the inoculation, it’s not about the virus, it’s about your data ... What parties have to understand is that any other functionality can be loaded onto that scaffold with no problem at all. It can be merged with your Paypal account, with your digital currency.

Microsoft is already talking about merging it with payment plans. Your network can be sucked up. It geolocates you everywhere you go. Your recognition biography can be included. All of your medical and health history can be included ...

It is absolutely so much more than a vaccine pass ... I cannot stress enough that it has the power to turn off your life, or to turn on your life, to let you engage in society or be marginalized.”

It’s All Been Building to This Point

Indeed, recreating China’s social approval structure here in the U.S. is likely easier at this quality than anyone would like to think, and probably wouldn’t take long to implement. Silicon Valley titan Oracle nabbed the contract to be the U.S. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention’s central data repository for all COVID-1 9 vaccine data in the U.S. earlier today in the pandemic.

Oracle likewise administers the database for COVID-1 9 cases and the National Institute for Reaction and Infectious Diseases( NIAID) database for clinical research into COVID-1 9 vaccines and drugs, a program overseen by Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Now consider this: Oracle has for many years also controlled the U.S. national security database, as well as databases for the CIA, Navy Intelligence, Air Force Intelligence and the National Security Agency, plus bank, and a emcee of commercial databases. As reported by The Defender: 15

“’The information about your banks, your checking equilibriums, your saving offset is presented in an Oracle database, ’ Ellison was quoted in the 2004 volume,' The Naked Crowd.’' Your airline reservation is stored in an Oracle database. What diaries you bought on Amazon is stored in an Oracle database. Your profile on Yahoo! is presented in an Oracle database.’”

And, as Ellison admitted in 2002, thousands of databases can easily be integrated into a single national datum -- something he offered to do for free for the U.S. authority all the way back then.

The Defender also recounts an old-time Protection Advanced Research Projects Agency( DARPA) program called Total Information Awareness( TIA ), which sought to collect the medical record, dose drugs, DNA, financial results, wander data and media intake garbs of all Americans. 16

The justification for this vast data collection, according to DARPA, was that “the whole population needed surveillance to prevent not only future terrorist attacks, but bioterrorism and even naturally occurring disease outbreaks.” The program was defunded in 2003 after intense public backlash, “but TIA never actually went away, ” The Defender writes. 17 “Various of its programme of culminated up divvied into a network of military and intelligence programs.”

Here are a few more connections to consider when trying to decide whether a social credit organization is truly in the works, and why a vaccine passport could help a central function.

Oracle Labs, the research arm of Oracle, is partnered with DARPA to create an “optically interconnected supercomputer” -- something that would come in handy if groups together a big social credit organisation that necessitates interconnectivity between thousands of databases.

DARPA is also working on advanced pandemic monitoring and biological menace spotting. 18 In fact, it has an entire division specializing in biological technologies -- the Biological Technologies Office( BTO) -- which developed hydrogel, an implantable type of nanotechnology that gives light-based digital signals through wireless systems. 19

It’s basically a gel-like biosensor that can both record and share biological data. The hydrogel is manufactured by Profusa, which is partnered with the Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation2 0 and backed by Google, the largest data quarrying company in the world.

In 2020, there were rumors that this hydrogel would be part of Moderna’s mRNA delivery system. 21 DARPA, by the way, actually money Moderna extremely. 22 However, it is unclear whether hydrogel actually resolved up being used in Moderna’s or any other COVID-1 9 inoculation. At any frequency, it could be used, if not now, then in the future.

Now, ask yourself, considering all of these various data points that I’ve flooded -- which by no means includes everything -- just how likely is it that their own nationals social recognition arrangement based on digital surveillance, including medical and biological surveillance, is NOT in the works?

Vaccine Passports Spell the End of Freedom

I recently interviewed Wolf about her notebook “The End of America.” The book, published in 2007, was a prescient threat about the most term we now find ourselves in. In it, she laid out the 10 steps toward tyranny that have been followed by virtually every modern-day would-be tyrant.

“They all took the same 10 steps, and they always manipulate. I warned people that when you start to see these 10 stairs, you have to take action, because there is no way to recover once things go too far without a viciou coup or a civil war. We are[ now] at Step 10 ... and once Step 10 fastens in, there is no going back, ” Wolf says.

The 10 steps toward tyranny begins with the invocation of a terrifying internal and/ or external threat. It may be a real threat or an imagined one, but in all cases, it’s a hyped-up threat. From 2001 onward, that threat was terrorism, which was used as the justification for stripping us of our liberties.

The last and final step in the implementation of tyranny, Step 10, involves the creation of a surveillance mood where citizens are under constant surveillance and critique of the government is reclassified as dissent and subversive activity. Vaccine passports are clearly an integral part of that surveillance apparatus, and a precursor to a social approval system.

There simply can be no doubt of that, and if we don’t put a stop to it now, we’ll be locked into not just a national dictatorship but a global one, run by unelected, primarily unknown individuals and Big Tech oligarchs. There will be no one to help anyone else, because all nations is in accordance with the same boat.

Peaceful Protest and Legislative Action Are the Remedy

To avoid the fate that comes next, everyone everywhere needs to recognize the jeopardy and taking any decision. Such war includes peaceful protest and civil disobedience -- simply not complying with mask mandates, social distancing, lockdowns, vaccination or anything else.

We must also fight through legislation. As has already mentioned, 14 U.S. districts have already passed laws banning requirements for vaccine passports, which protects the freedoms of everyone within those states. While that’s a good start, there are dozens more to go, and other countries need to enact such regulations as well. As noted by Wolf in my interrogation with her 😛 TAGEND

“Once[ vaccine passports] are launched ... beings looks just like you and I, Dr. Mercola, will be switched off of culture.' Oops, my inoculation passport is positive. I predict I can't get food shopping for my family.’' I said something critical of biofascism on Dr. Mercola's show, so now my child can't get into school.’

Just as in Israel, where people who are pundits are being surveilled[ and] marginalized from culture, it has turned into a two-tier society. If you choose not to get injected, then you're truly in a marginalized minority in an apartheid state.

The more we know about these vaccines, the scarier it is to have coercion that is social. It's also illegal. In America, we have the Americans with Disabilities Act. It signifies it's illegal to even ask me anything about my medical status. You can't ask me if I'm pregnant. You can't ask me if I'm incapacitated. You can't ask me if I have diabetes or HIV. You cannot ask me anything. By definition, these intrusive measures are unlawful.

We have to use the law to save the law, mostly ... We have to fight before we are living in fascist regime where every move is tracked and we're marginalized from society.”

Read more: articles.mercola.com


The Truth About COVID

I recently had the opportunity to be a guest on Mikhaila Peterson’s “Opposing Views” on the topic of COVID-1 9. Open debate and sharing of information from all sides is so important, extremely now that censorship of certain groups, organisations or types -- in direct violation of Constitutional law -- is rampant.

The other guest boasted was Jeremy Kamil, Ph.D ., an associate professor of microbiology and immunology at LSU Health Shreveport, who has studied the herpes virus for two decades and has a passion for studying how viruses direct. Peterson said she emailed 20 physicians to get views from the conventional medical community on COVID-1 9 -- and Kamil was the only one who agreed to be on the show.

I encourage you to watch the video in full and make up your own mind about what you hear, but as I didn’t get a chance to respond to Kamil’s proclamations instantly, I’d like to do that now, as well as cater a summary of some of the most important take-away targets from the interrogation.

A Trial run for COVID-1 9, a Lab-Engineered Virus

When talking about COVID-1 9, it’s important to start at the start -- not the start of the pandemic but Event 201, which took place in October 2019.

Representatives from the World Economic Forum, the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Johns Hopkins University Population Center, the World Bank, the Chinese government and inoculation producer Johnson& Johnson were among those at the incident, which was organized by Bill Gates and, too coincidentally, simulated a worldwide pandemic triggered by a romance coronavirus. 1,2

Mirroring what is now passing, social media censoring was a prominent strategy used at the happen to protect the dissemination of vaccine propaganda and the narrative adjacent the world occurrence. If you are considering brushing this off as “conspiracy theory, ” you can read about Event 201 for yourself at its official place. 3

Peterson and I discussed a little about Gates, and you may be wondering why I’m bringing him up. It’s part of understanding the immense power and control being wielded by private individuals and the ultimate goal of technocratic tyranny. When the U.S. withdrew fund from the World Health Organization in 2020, Gates became the most difficult funder of the WHO.

The two -- Gates and the WHO -- have been instrumental in pushing for a global vaccination campaign, and Gates has a great deal of coin be used in these vaccines. The WHO is the tool that was used to implement a world-wide shutdown -- a catastrophe -- in 2020, with the final goal being resource movement, financial ruin and societal reformation.

It is also interested that Gates and busines have restricted access to this highly productive vaccine exclusively to countries that can afford it. The patents have not been shared with other countries so they could get this “lifesaving” vaccine, which clearly emphasizes that the primary purpose of this inoculation will not save lives but to draw enormous profits.

Gates isn’t the alone player -- there are many others, including Google and founder and ministerial chairman of the World Economic Forum( WEF) Klaus Schwab, who firstly started flowing the relevant recommendations of The Great Reset. Kamil said he wasn’t familiar with the word, which is something I’d urge him to read up on as he articulates his opinions.

I likewise touched briefly on the tremendou indication suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 is an engineered virus that seeped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology( WIV ), which was conducting gain-of-function research on coronaviruses, money by Dr. Anthony Fauci. 4 It’s a lot to take in, I know, peculiarly if this is the first you’re hearing about it, but as the bits of the dilemma taken together, it becomes obvious what is really going on.

No Flu Cases Because' Masks Are Really Effective’?

When expected about the inscrutable disappearance of flu during the 2020 -2 021 season, Kamil stated it’s because “masks are really effective[ at] suppressing viral transmission.” If that’s the action, then why didn’t COVID-1 9 instances similarly disappear? The next rational question is, were flu cases and deaths simply reallocated as COVID-1 9 extinctions?

Up until around July 2020, the U.S. Middle for Disease Control and Prevention( CDC) counted flu and pneumonia fatalities separately, but then began reporting a combination of pneumonia, flu and COVID extinctions, under a new category listed as "PIC"( Pneumonia, Influenza, COVID ), via their COVIDView webpage. 5

February 12, 2021 -- toward the end of crest flu season in the U.S. -- COVIDView was replaced with the COVID Data Tracker Weekly Review, which no longer appears to mention flu and pneumonia. 6

As for the effectiveness of disguises -- and the absurdities smothering their apply during works like swimming -- there’s a wealth of proof that disguises are ineffective. Exclusively one randomized restrained trouble has been conducted on mask usage and COVID-1 9 dissemination, and it noted disguises did not statistically significantly reduce the incidence of infection. 7

A working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research8 pointed out that nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as lockdowns, quarantines and disguise edicts, have not significantly affected overall virus transmitting paces. 9

Proper Response' Must Be Driven by Case Numbers’

When asked what the “proper” response to the pandemic "wouldve been", Kamil said, “It has to be driven by client numbers.” This sounds good in theory, plied the occurrence amounts you’re locating recommendations on are accurate -- and the resulting recommendations are in line with the severity of the disease and individual risk assessments. But, in the case of COVID-1 9, they most often were not.

What sign is there that the speciman counts were manipulated? PCR exams recommended by the WHO used to be set to 45 hertz thresholds( CTs ), 10 more the scientific consensus has long been that anything over 35 CTs interprets the test useless, 11 as the accuracy will be a measly 3 %, with the other 97% being incorrect positives and artificially driving up contingency numbers.

Then, one hour after Joe Biden’s inauguration as the 46 th president of the United States, January 20, 2021, the WHO -- unexpectedly and out of the blue -- lower the recommended PCR CT, 12 which automatically guaranteed that the number of “cases, ” i.e ., positive PCR test ensues, would sink.

And this isn’t even coming into how the CDC changed how COVID-1 9 is recorded on fatality credentials in March 2020, de-emphasizing preexisting conditions and comorbidities, and mostly announcing all deaths in which the patient had a positive SARS-CoV-2 test a COVID-1 9 death.

'Look to People Who Aren’t Making a Buck Off It’

Another one of Kamil’s stages was to avoid going data from “someone trying to sell you something.” I would agree, simply Kamil use the illustration of someone “selling a health augment online, ” ignoring the fact that the real profiteers in this pandemic are not people selling adds-on online but billionaires who are only get richer.

Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna , now has a net worth of $5.3 billion, 13 to give one example. He affiliated the billionaires club April 2, 2020, when bulletin that phase 2 trials of Moderna’s COVID vaccine were set to begin, driving up its inventory. 14

Meanwhile, Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has already engendered $3.5 billion in income in the first three months of 2021,15 and the company said it expects “durable demand” for the vaccine to continue in coming years, same to flu inoculations. Approximates recommend revenue been able to reach $26 billion for Pfizer’s COVID vaccine by the end of 2021.16

So, following Kamil’s own advice, Pfizer and Moderna would be among those to not rely, located on their produce billions, which is exponentially more than any add-on make is performing. But even putting revenues aside, as I told Peterson, one point that should yield anyone interrupt before trusting a company would be if it has a criminal history of fraud and selling hazardous commodities -- of which both Pfizer and Johnson& Johnson can attest to.

Myth: It’s' Impossible to Die From COVID’ After Vaccination

Kamil made some explanations that I strongly made in accordance with, one of them being that if you get a COVID-1 9 inoculation “it’s virtually 100% impossible for you to die from COVID -- even if you caught like the scariest discrepancies we know of.” This is simply not true. As of April 26, 2021, there have been 9,245 reported cases of COVID-1 9 in fully vaccinated types, including 132 fatalities. 17 This is from the CDC’s own data.

There’s too a jeopardy of fatality from the COVID-1 9 inoculation. According to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System( VAERS ), as of April 23, 2021, there are still 3,544 demises reported following COVID-1 9 vaccination. 18 Past investigations have shown only between 1 and 10% 20 of adverse reactions are ever reported to VAERS, which is a passive, voluntary reporting plan, so the actual number could be much higher.

Kamil likewise was argued that if you’re healthy, it clears no inconsistency in terms of getting sick from COVID-1 9 because “viruses like healthy cells” and “they love a health[ cell] just like a person might, if you're a carnivore, might like a juicy steak.”

This seriously undermines the capability that you have to take control of your health, because, in reality, it’s well known that people who are unhealthy, with underlying provisions, are far more likely to contract and die from COVID-1 9. Your regime of health utterly matters.

Kamil too seems to be seriously misguided about health companies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, stating that it doesn’t “make a dollar more” by authorize a vaccine and describing it as “one of the very best groups, like, as far as protecting your health and watching out for, like, Americans.”

While the FDA itself does not accept corporate fund, it does receive money funneled via a nonprofit organization, which in turn receives coin from other nonprofits funded by private interests. It’s genuinely all a facade because the end result is the same. Those giving the money eventually end up with the ability to pull strings, when necessary. The FDA’s conflicts of interest and failures to act on behalf of Americans’ level of interest are also well noted.

Nervousnes Is the Most Powerful Emotion to Drive Human Behavior

The pandemic has succeeded in generating fear and controlling human behavior, and anything that bars its final solution of vaccination is being censored -- this is a evidence that shouldn’t be overlooked. Vaccine passports are also being offered as part of this solution, as a tool to get your freedom back, but it’s at the toll of -- your freedom.

Imagine a life in which you cannot travel, going to see a sports event, enter your workplace or even a grocery store unless you have the proper credentials. If it sounds like history repeating itself in the most horrific way, you’re not far off. Even open debate is being stillness, and it’s absurd to give informed consent to vaccination if you simply know one area. When you simply have one surface to the story, then that’s propaganda , not real information.

What Should You Do to Stay Healthy Against COVID?

Peterson asked me one very important issue, which was what should people be doing to stay health. One key strategy is to be metabolically adaptable, and my No. 1 recommendation to do so is to remove linoleic acid from your diet.

Omega-6 linoleic acid( LA) is a injurious metabolic deadly that is highly susceptible to oxidation, and as the fat oxidizes, it separates down into harmful subcomponents such as advanced lipid oxidation end products( ALES) and oxidized LA metabolites( OXLAMS ). These ALES and OXLAMS also induce mar. To escape LA, which relates to chronic degenerative infection, it is necessary to to avoid all vegetable oils and eliminate virtually all processed foods and restaurant menus from your diet.

Other strategies to build immunity include optimizing vitamin D. My peer reviewed study, published in the gazette Nutrients in October 2020,21 supports the clear link between vitamin D shortcoming and severe cases of COVID-1 9.

I likewise recommend instructing yourself with nebulized hydrogen peroxide, which can be used not only to improve indications but as a routine maintenance policy to subsistence optimal health. You can listen the rest of the interview in its entirety, including the unique gambles posed by mRNA inoculations, by watching the video above.

Read more: articles.mercola.com


Karnataka govt asks those who took Covishield not to come to vaccination centres before 12 weeks

The Karnataka government on Friday queried those who made the Covishield vaccine not to come to vaccination midsts if they have not accomplished 12 weeks of the first dose, quoting advisory of expert groups.

In a press release, the vaccination duty lead said the second dose of Covishield vaccine should be administered to eligible beneficiaries at 12 to 16 weeks interval after receiving the firstly dose as recommended by the National Technical Advisory Group of Immunization( NTAGI) and National Expert Working group on Vaccine Administration( NEGVAC ).

"Hence, the earlier interval of six to eight weeks of period for Covishield vaccination between 2 quantities is revised to 12 to 16 weeks. Citizens are solicited not to come to vaccination cores if they have not ended 12 weeks after the first dose of Covishield vaccine, " the secrete said.

The release clarified that the revised time interval between two quantities is applicable only to Covishield and not Covaxin.

The State government recently suspended the vaccination of people between the age group of 18 and 44 due to inadequate stock of inoculation in the state.

The government has already targeted an ordering for three crore vaccines and paid fund to the vaccine producers.

However, exclusively seven lakh inoculations have arrived, according to officials.

The government intends to float global tenders to procure two crore vaccines.

Meanwhile, Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister Dr C N Ashwath Narayan recently announced that Covaxin-manufacturing plant of Bharat Biotech will be set up soon in Kolar district, and that the construction work has already begun and the government has invited investors to shape the vaccine in Karnataka.

So far, 1.10 crore parties in Karnataka have been inoculated, but vaccination for people in the age group of 18 -4 4 has been put off due to the shortage of vaccine. The government has told three crore vaccines and has paid coin to the manufacturers but till now still further simply seven lakh vaccines have been received.

The State has reported 41,779 fresh the circumstances and 373 fatalities despite strict restrictions on the movement of parties from April 27 till May 24.

Edited by Megha Reddy

Read more: yourstory.com


View: Can Covid shift our politics?

The dreaded second ripple of the coronavirus has created a national emergency. You’d think it would have united our republic, but India remains terribly divided. A easy trouble of injecting our beings becomes the subject of political football. While aam admi clambers helplessly from hospital to hospital in search of oxygen, a bunked, a ventilator, our registered political party react like prehistoric tribes, defending ballots as though they are clashes for extinction. They don’t even share a common vocabulary to empathise in this Age of Hatred.A strange political drama uncovered in four numbers last week. The background was a sudden realisation that India, the world’s largest producer and trader of vaccines, faced a life-and-death dearth of Covid vaccine. The nation hadn’t contracted in advance , nor offered a price that would have incentivised vaccine makers to build sufficient capacity. It hadn’t learnt from past mistakes.In the first month of Covid, the administration has already curtailed testing to state laboratories. The illnes was spreading, government laboratories couldn’t cope, India was frequently cited for testing outage. Realising its misunderstanding, the government liberalised. It allowed in the private sector and testing took off via numerous competitive works, including dwelling his mission to skilled professionals, is supervised by an excellent app.This lesson was forgotten in the vaccination programme. Early on, the territory "shouldve been" trusted private hospices, inhabitant associations, companies and NGOs to implement a energetic vaccination curriculum via dual pricing- free inoculation for the poorest of the poor at authority hospitals and a market price at private hospitals, where people are willing to pay for healthcare. Vaccine makes would thus have recovered lost profit from supplying to the state.The first act of the drama opened on April 18 when former PM Manmohan Singh wrote a sensible letter to PM Narendra Modi, proposing ways to ramp up the vaccination program. His plan included targeting immediate line-ups backed by funds to vaccine makes; earmarking the importing of inoculations cleared by believable permissions abroad without vowing on Indian contests; and returning the states greater afford and freedom to decide whom to vaccinate.In the second act, Singh’s well-meaning letter elicited an uncharacteristic rant from the Union health minister Harsh Vardhan, who alleged the Congress of contributing to the second Covid brandish by establishing irresponsible hesitancy of the public against the inoculation in some Congress-ruled territory. He said that he believes that while dishonor the vaccines publicly, Congress chairwomen “took their quantities in private, quietly”. Whatever the truth, this was not the place or the way to say it.The third act in the drama was Centre’s striking announcement on April 19 of a major change in the vaccination policy. Given the relentless upsurge in infections, the government intensified its vaccination curriculum; reversing its earlier programme, it liberalised its posture to the private sector, countenancing half the inoculations to be sold at market price, and making greater flexibility to the states. Many of Singh’s suggestions, once under evaluation for weeks, was already in the new strategy.In the fourth ordinance vaccine producers answered immediately, predicting rapid additions in capacity, introducing down dramatically the time to vaccinate India’s population. Rahul Gandhi criticized their own policies for “no free inoculations for 18 -4 5 year olds, middlemen brought in without price controls”. Sonia Gandhi expression it “brazen profiteering from misery”. The programme went off a vigorous debate in the media. The pall came down on the theatre when Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee accused Modi for manufacturing the second Covid billow to triumph the Bengal election.What exercises can we draw from this theatre? Harsh Vardhan is a soft-spoken, likeable subject. His disparaging reply to Singh points to a deeper ailment in the polity. Democracy accepts inconsistencies and difference but under the basic rules of cooperation. Today, there is such violence, hatred among foes, it’s an uncivil war. Mamata’s bizarre remark stimulates smell only if you believe the Bengal election is a battle for extinguishing. Until recently, politicians didn’t think of election routs as permanent; the loser went on to fight the next election.A second instruction: India’s politicians is likely to be subdivided the republic but they remain united in an unwarranted sect in the capacity of the state. They doubt other citizens, private enterprises, private NGOs. Had they relied society and the market, the initial testing and vaccinating programmes would have been more sensible. Instead they trusted the bureaucracy, which has given them down in the second wave. It could have simply co-opted the army, set up mega Covid centres in stadia, and avoided the panic and the misfortune. Congress’s response to the vaccine strategy was, of course, typically statist in its ignorance and disregard for the private sector.Three, those who belief India is no longer free, ought to have witnessed last week’s exuberant debate on the vaccine policy. It is not simply Congress, but analysi came in abundance from economists, policy wonks, and of course, the polemical Indian vanished berserk on social media. These are not signeds of an unfree country.Four, Harsh Vardhan’s unfortunate reply was also defensive. Because BJP has long been the object of condescension by the old society, it hides deep feeling. Congress has been in power so long, it has an instinctive creed in its own superiority. With noblesse pressure, it considers BJP contemptuously as the nouveau riche.The end result is a faultline defined by a lack of reciprocal respect. Eradicating contempt is a bit like save the lives of a flunking wedlock. But when the commonwealth is at stake, it is the people who suffer. And indeed, they are suffering in these shocking Covid hours in an Age of Hatred.Bestselling generator Gurcharan Das is a onetime CEO of Procter& Gamble India.

Read more: economictimes.indiatimes.com


COVID-19 Vaccines Likened to ‘Software Updates’ for Your Body

I've discussed why COVID-1 9 vaccines are in fact gene regimen and not inoculations in several previous articles, including "COVID-1 9 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines, " "COVID-1 9 'Vaccines' Are Gene Therapy" and "How COVID-1 9 'Vaccines' May Destroy the Lives of Millions."

However, despite being a recognized form of gene care since its inception, inoculation makers are now madly trying to deny that this mRNA technology is gene care. One rationale for this, suggested by David Martin, Ph.D ., 1 are likely to be because as long as they're considered "vaccines, " they will be shielded from obligation.

Experimental gene therapies is not have monetary indebtednes shielding from the government, but pandemic inoculations do, even in the experimental stage, as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect. Another ground might be because they fear parties won't line up for experimental gene care. It has a very different connotation in people's minds( as it should ).

A third possible is that they know full well that you cannot, ethically, mandate gene therapy in the way you can mandate vaccines. Mandatory public health quantify mandates are generally based on the idea that it's acceptable for some individuals to be harmed as long as the measure advantages the collective.

Well, the COVID-1 9 "vaccines" are only designed to lessen symptoms of COVID-1 9. They do not prevent infection or spread, and since the inoculated individual is the only one receiving a potential benefit, "the greater good" argument dies apart.

Who knows, there may be other factors at performance that we've not realized as of yet, but whatever the reason, they genuinely do not demand you to think of these doses as gene care. They require you to accept them as any other conventional vaccine.

mRN-ABased Medicines Designed to Not Irreversibly Alter DNA

Try as they are likely, though, they cannot get rid of mRNA's gene therapy label. For starters, Moderna describes its product as "gene therapy technology" in its SEC filings. On sheet 70, they too supply the following: 2

"Currently, mRNA is considered a gene regiman make by the FDA. Unlike specific gene regimen that irreversibly alter cadre DNA and could act as a source of side effects, mRN-Abased medications are are in place to not irreversibly vary cell DNA; nonetheless, side effects observed in gene care could negatively impact the insight of mRNA medicines despite variations in mechanism."

In other utterances, it's a assemble of gene care, but one that doesn't enter and permanently alter your actual DNA. Instead, the mRNA is still in the cellular fluid where ribosomes predict the code and start the protein per the mRNA's coding.

The difference between vaccine mRNA and your natural mRNA is that your natural mRNA resides in the nucleus of the cadre where your cellular DNA resides -- it can be likened to a overturn reproduction of your DNA -- and exits the nucleus when a protein needs to be made.

This is in stark contrast to mRNA from inoculations, which is synthetic and enrolls the cell from the outside and is not are in place to penetrate the nucleus. Additionally, your own mRNA is rapidly cheapened by enzymes, but the one from the inoculation is protected in a liposome that will protect it from degeneration and keep on producing spike proteins. How long? No one knows because it has never been tested.

Can Vaccine mRNA Reverse-Transcribe Into Genome?

However, some doctors still worry that mRNA doses might be able to reverse-transcribe into your genes and modify your DNA on a permanent basis. One is Dr. Richard Urso, an ophthalmologist, who shared his concerns on a December 2020 occurrence of The Shepard Ambellas Show. 3,4

He claimed the mRNA of retroviruses( which are part of our genome) have been shown to have the ability to transcribe into your DNA, and if it can do that, vaccine mRNA might be able to do this as well. According to Urso, if this turns out to be correct, the upshot of mRNA vaccination might be lifelong COVID-1 9.

A new study by MIT and Harvard scientists demonstrates that some part of the RNA from the coronavirus itself are most likely becoming a permanent fixture in human DNA. This was immediately saw nearly impossible, for the same reasons which are presented to assure us that an RNA vaccine could reach no such stunt.~ Dr. Doug Corrigan

Another skeptic is Dr. Doug Corrigan, who in a March 16, 2021, blog reviewed the findings of recent research5, 6 expres SARS-CoV-2 RNA can reverse-transcribe into the human genome: 7

"In my previous blog, 'Will an RNA Vaccine Permanently Alter My DNA? '8 I laid down by several molecular pathways that would potentially enable the RNA in an mRNA vaccine to be simulated and permanently being incorporated into your DNA.

I was absolutely not surprised to find that the majority of beings claimed that this prospect was impossible ... After all, we've been told in no uncertain terms that it would be impossible for the mRNA in a inoculation to become integrated into our DNA, simply because 'RNA doesn't work that way.'

Well, this current research which was exhausted not too long after my original clause demonstrates that yes, surely, 'RNA does work that way' ... Specifically, a new study9, 10 by MIT and Harvard scientists demonstrates that some part of the RNA from the coronavirus itself are most likely becoming a permanent fixture in human DNA.

This was once felt nearly impossible, for the same reasons which are presented to assure us that an RNA vaccine could achieve no such accomplishment. Against the tides of current biological dogma, these researchers found that the genetic segments of this RNA virus are more than likely making their way into our genome.

They also found that the exact pathway that I are set forth in in my original clause is more than likely the pathway being used( retrotransposon, and including a LINE-1 ingredient) for this retro-integration to occur.

And, unlike my previous blog where I hypothesize that such an manifestation would be extremely rare( chiefly because I was attempting to temper beliefs more conservatively because of the absence of empirical proof ), it appears that this integration of viral RNA segments into our DNA is not as rare as I initially hypothesized ...

To be fair, this study didn't show that the RNA from the present vaccines is being integrated into our DNA. However, they did establish, relatively convincingly, that there exists a viable cellular pathway whereby snippets of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA could become being incorporated into our genomic DNA. In my view, more study is needed to both corroborate these sees, and to close some gaps."

A January 2020 Phys.org clause, 11 "Modified RNA Has a Direct Effect on DNA, " also notes that "it has now been discovered that RNA has a direct effect on DNA stability, " and this too may or may not play a role in mRNA therapy for COVID-1 9.

Vaccine Makers Fear Negative Perception of Gene Therapy

Getting back to Moderna's SEC filing, in it, they likewise be recognized that public taste of other types of gene therapy may negatively impact perception of mRNA medications. The trouble, they admit, is that irreversible gene cares have side effects, and knowing this, people might spurn mRNA remedies extremely. The SEC filing goes on to note: 12

"Because no product in which mRNA is the primary active ingredient has been approved, the regulatory pathway for admiration is uncertain. The amount and pattern of the clinical inquiries and preclinical studies needed for the approved by these types of medicines have not been established, is different from those required for gene rehabilitation produces, or may be needed security testing like gene regiman products."

Well, the pandemic enabled them to sneak mRNA gene rehabilitation for the purposes of the proverbial radar so that they don't have to conduct more stringent gene therapy safe testing. Instead, they only sided the global population for the largest testing imaginable, and all without drawback when something goes wrong -- specified it's viewed as a "vaccine, " that is.

mRNA Rehabilitations Classified as Gene Therapy in Europe and US

The SEC filing1 3 for BioNTech( BioNTech's mRNA technology is used in the Pfizer vaccine) is equally clear, territory on sheet 21: "Although we expect to submit BLAs for our mRN-Abased make candidates in the United State, and in the The european institutions, mRNA regimen have been classified as gene therapy medicinal products, other districts may be regarded our mRN-Abased product nominees to be new stimulants, not biologics or gene rehabilitation medicinal products, and involve different marketing applications."

So, in the U.S. and Europe, mRNA regimen, as a group, are classified as "gene therapy medicinal products." The crux now, again, appears to be the idea that mRNA therapy does not motive permanent DNA modifications. On page 35 of the BioNTech SEC filing, they to clarify the alleged discrepancies between other, irreparable, gene regimen and mRNA gene regiman 😛 TAGEND

"There have been few permissions of gene therapy products in the United States and other jurisdictions, and there have been well-reported significant adverse events are connected with their testing and use.

Gene therapy produces have the effects of feeing brand-new DNA and potentially irreversibly deepening the DNA in a cadre. In differ, mRNA is highly unlikely to localize to the nucleus, integrate into cadre DNA, or otherwise make any permanent changes to cell DNA.

Consequently, we expect that our commodity campaigners will have a different possible side effects chart from gene cares because there is a shortage of probabilities are connected with adjusting cadre DNA irreversibly."

Hacking the Software of Life

Company executives and scientists familiar with mRNA technology have, for years, been referring to this new technology as gene therapy. The video above aspects a TED Talk by Dr. Tal Zaks, leader medical officer of Moderna, given in 2017, more than two full years before COVID-1 9.

In it, he notes that they only, at that time, already working on a variety of vaccines, including an mRNA vaccine for influenza and individualized cancer vaccines based on the genetic cycle of the patient's tumor, stressing that this vaccine would not act like any previous inoculation ever appointed.

"We've been living this remarkable digital technical change, and I'm here today to tell you that we are actually hacking the software of life, and that it's changing the path we think about prevention and treatment of cancer, " Zaks said.

"In every cadre there's this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short-lived, that moves the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we're all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what the cell will actually do. So, we think of it as an operating arrangement ...

So, if you could change that ... if you could initiate a line of system, or conversion a line of system, it turns out that has profound connections for everything, from the influenza to cancer ...

Imagine if instead of giving[ individual patients] the protein of a virus, we granted them the instructions on how to compile the protein, how their own bodies can make its own vaccine, " he said.

How mRNA Vaccines Work

Zaks further differentiates conventional vaccines and mRNA vaccines by explain that when using a conventional inoculation, you have viral protein floating around outside the cell, whereas the mRNA approach reprograms the cell to create that viral protein inside of itself.

"What's more alarming? " he expects. "A stranger prowling the neighborhood, or somebody who exactly broke into your first floor and jaunted alarm systems? That's what happens with an mRNA inoculation. You've tripped the alarm wire and now the cadre is phoning 911, it's calling the police -- at the same time that it's utter the protein, saying 'That's the bad guy.' That's how an mRNA vaccine works."

Zaks likewise refers to the company's mRNA shots as "information therapy, " which is just another way of saying gene care because mRNA is a carrier of genetic code.( For clarification, code in your natural mRNA coincides your DNA, whereas inoculation mRNA has no equivalence inside your genome since it's coming from the outside. Vaccine mRNA still carries "genetic code, " though, only not anything found in your body before .) As explained on genome.gov: 14

"Messenger RNA( mRNA) is a single-stranded RNA molecule that is complementary to one of the DNA strands of a gene. The mRNA is an RNA version of the gene that needles the cell nucleus and moves to the cytoplasm where proteins are induce.

During protein synthesis, an organelle called a ribosome moves along the mRNA, reads its base cycle, and uses the genetic code to translate each three-base triplet, or codon, into its corresponding amino acid.

mRNA, are one of the different types of RNA the hell is found in the cell. This specific one, like most RNAs, are made in the nucleus and then exported to the cytoplasm where the rendition system, the machine who really shapes proteins, fixes to these mRNA molecules and predicts the system on the mRNA to make a specific protein.

So in general, one gene, the DNA for one gene, can be transcribed into an mRNA molecule that will end up making one specific protein."

mRNA Technology Ushers in Transhumanism

In genuine technocratic, transhumanist Fourth Industrial Revolution fashion, Zaks and other mRNA pushers end the body as your equipment, your genetic code as software and these mRNA insertions as software updates. As noted by Patrick Wood in a recent Technocracy News article: 15

"Pure and simple, this is unvarnished, raw transhumanism ... Scientists believe that they can rewrite the genetic code[ his messages , not mine, for all you out there who still don't guess these mRNA vaccines change the genetic code exactly because some 'fact checker' says they don't ], concluding they can improve on a person's God-given genetic makeup is entering perilous territory ...

These scientists rightfully believe that the human person is nothing more than a machine that can be spoofed into and reordered according to some programmer's teaches ... Who's to say they won't correct one problem and appoint something so bad? "

What Is Transhumanism?

What precisely is transhumanism? Technocracy News describes1 6 it as "a changed doctrine that believes in the use of high technology to convert humen into immortal beings ... Furthermore, they seek to use genetic engineering to create a brand-new captain race of kinds, that are able to molted all of the 'unseemly' characteristics of humans." Britannica defines1 7 it as a 😛 TAGEND

" ... social and theoretical motion devoted to promoting the research and development of robust human-enhancement engineerings. Such engineerings would augment or increase human sensory receipt, emotive ability, or cognitive capability as well as radically improve human health and lengthen human life spans.

Such modifications ensuing from the additive of biological or physical engineerings would be more or less permanent and integrated into the human body."

Great Reset Is a Transhumanist Agenda

Miklos Lukacs de Pereny, investigate prof of science and technology policy at the Peruvian University San Martin de Porres, has given presentations1 8 and interviews1 9 in which he warned that transhumanism are an integral component of the Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution agendas, which are being rolled out at a furious speed under the auspices of the COVID-1 9 pandemic. As reported by Life Site News, November 10, 2020:20

"The COVID-1 9 pandemic was manufactured by the world's elites as part of a are projected to globally betterment 'transhumanism' -- literally, the synthesi of human beings with engineering in an attempt to alter human nature itself and create a superhuman being and an 'earthly paradise, ' distributed according to a Peruvian academic and professional in technology.

This dystopian nightmare scenario is no longer the stuff of science fiction, but an integral part of the proposed post-pandemic 'Great Reset, ' Dr. Miklos Lukacs de Pereny said at a recent summit on COVID-1 9.

Indeed, to the fullest extent that implementing the transhumanist agenda is possible, it requires the absorption of political and financial supremacy in the entrusts of a world-wide society and the dependence of beings on the mood, said Lukacs.

That's accurately the aim of the Great Reset, promoted by German economist Klaus Schwab, CEO and founder of World Economic Forum, along with billionaire 'philanthropists' George Soros and Bill Gates and other owneds, directors, and stockholders of Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Finance who convene at the WEF withdraws at Davos, Switzerland, battled Lukacs.

Transhumanists ... seek to 'relativize the human being' and 'turn it into a putty that can be modified or molded to our preference and our desire and by reject those limits nature or God have placed on us' ...

Indeed, WEF's Schwab has been promoting the Great Reset as a style to 'harness the Fourth Industrial Revolution' ... which, he declared in January 2016, 'will affect the very essence of our human experience.' Schwab described the Fourth Industrial Revolution then as 'a synthesi of technologies that is blurring the lines among the physical, digital and biological spheres' ...

Those technologies include genetic engineering such as CRISPR genetic editing, neural networks( A.I .), robotics, the Internet of Things( IoT ), 3D printing, and quantum computing. 'The Fourth Industrial Revolution is nothing other than the implementation of transhumanism on a global level, ' emphasized Lukacs."

mRNA Technology Is Still Gene Therapy

In "COVID-1 9 'Vaccines' Are Gene Therapy"( hyperlinked above ), I accommodate even more background information demonstrating that mRNA "vaccines" are in fact gene care, and how this technology has been considered and presented as gene therapy in the past.

The fact is, everywhere you look, mRNA technology, mRNA therapy and mRNA remedies -- anything mRNA -- have been, for years, treated as a shape of gene regiman. Take the 2015 paper2 1 "mRNA: Fulfilling the Promise of Gene Therapy" in the magazine Molecular Therapy. In this paper, the authors point out that in vitro-transcribed mRNA has the potential to play a role in gene regiman previously simply foreseen for DNA.

Back in 2009, the paper2 2 "Current Prospects for mRNA Gene Delivery" in the European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics noted that while "replication-deficient viruses have been used most successfully in the field of gene therapy ... mRNA has ... developed as an beautiful and promising alternative in the nonviral gene delivery battleground, " and a 2019 paper2 3 in Frontiers in Oncology discussed the therapeutic prospects of "mRN-Abased gene therapy for glioblastoma."

If they want to call it "temporary gene therapy, " I'm OK with that -- catered they can prove that it is in fact temporary, how long the effects last-place, and that vaccine mRNA cannot reverse-transcribe into the human genome like SARS-CoV-2 RNA apparently can.

But to deny that it's gene therapy absolutely and insist that it's simply an informed way of vaccine technology is simply impossible, as it does not play-act any of terms of reference of an actual vaccine( i.e ., foreclose infection and spread ).

Do You Want to Update Your Software?

Now, if our genetic makeup is to be viewed as "the software of life, " as Zaks introduces it, then should we not have the sole authority to decide for ourselves whether we actually want a "software update, " be it temporary or permanent?

"If we truly live in a free society, wouldn't it stand to reason that we would want to have an industrious debate over how to answer that question? " Wood requests. 24

"Contrary to what some scientists guess, we can not simply machines. We are human beings with forms, spirits and free wills. Anyone who tries to mandate the acceptance of an experimental gene-altering treatment is going against the international Nuremberg Codes, which require informed consent of any experimental treatment."

What to Do if You've Had a Change of Heart

If you already got the vaccine and now regret it, you are allowed to to address your evidences expending the same strategies you'd use to treat actual SARS-CoV-2 infection. I refreshed these strategies at the end of "Why COVID Vaccine Testing Is a Farce."

Last but not least, if you got the vaccine and are having side effects, please help raise public awareness by reporting it. The Children's Health Defense is calling on all who have suffered a side effect from a COVID-1 9 vaccine to do these three things: 25

If "youre living in" the U.S ., file a report on VAERS

Report the harm on VaxxTracker.com, which is a nongovernmental adverse event tracker( you can file anonymously if you like)

Report the injury on the CHD website

Read more: articles.mercola.com


COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Are Gene Therapy

As calls for obligatory COVID-1 9 vaccination grow various regions of the world, it's becomes increasingly crucial to understand what these insertions actually are. The mRNA "vaccines" created by Moderna and Pfizer are in fact gene cares.

As I'll explain below, there's simply no way around this, and drug manufacturers and public health officials must be made to admit this point. Why? Because it makes all the divergence in the world. You cannot mandate a gene therapy against COVID-1 9 any more than you can force entire populations to undergo gene therapy for a cancer they do not have and may never be at risk for.

Interestingly enough, mainstream media, knowledge checkers and various manufacture front groups hold the gene regiman assert is bogus, even though every single detail about the vaccines screams otherwise. Why are they spreading this disinformation? Why do they not want you to know what these injections actually are?

In short, they know labeling them as "gene therapies" would be like slapping a skull and crossbones label on them. Most parties have enough common sense have discovered that gene therapy is a different ballgame from a regular vaccination, and might be a bad thought, especially for children and younger someones.

mRNA 'Vaccines' Fulfill None of the Criteria for a Vaccine

To start, let's take a look at some basic definitions of words. Harmonizing to the U.S. Cores for Disease Control and Prevention, a inoculation is: 1

"A product that animates a person's immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease."

Immunity, in turn, is defined as:

"Protection from an infectious disease, " meaning that "If "youre ever" immune to an illness, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected."

That's the medical explanation. The legal explanation, in the few cases where it has been detailed, is equally unequivocal:

Iowa code2 -- "Vaccine wants a specially developed antigen dispensed to person or persons for the purpose of providing immunity."

Washington state code3, 4 -- "Vaccine necessitates a been prepared by a killed or attenuated living micro-organism, or fraction thereof ... " The statute too specifies that a vaccine "upon immunization induces exemption that protects us against infection ... "

These clarities, both medical and law, present problems for mRNA "vaccines, " since 😛 TAGEND

mRNA infusions do not impart immunity. Moderna and Pfizer both be recognized that their clinical troubles aren't even looking at immunity. As such they is not fulfill the medical and/ or legal interpretation of a vaccine.

They do not impede transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection. As such they do not fulfill the medical and/ or law explanation of a vaccine.

Dictionaries Attempt to Rewrite Medical Terms

We should not be fooled by attempts to condition the public to accept redefined words. As of February 2019, Merriam-Webster defined5 "vaccine" as "a preparation of killed microbes, living attenuated organisms, or living fully venomous creatures that is administered to produce or artificially increase exemption to a particular disease." By February 26, 2021, the government has informed the definition of "vaccine" to: 6

"A preparation that is administered( as by injection) to stimulate the body's immune response against a particular contagious diseases 😛 TAGEND

a: an antigenic preparation of a often inactivated or attenuated ... pathogenic negotiator( such as a bacterium or virus) or one of its components or makes( such as a protein or toxin)

b: a preparation of genetic fabric( such as a rope of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic essence( such as a fragment of virus spike protein) "

Let's be clear. Merriam-Webster does not dictate medical jargon. It can be used, nonetheless, to confound beings. For now, all medical dictionaries still show the traditional explanation of vaccine, 7 as Merriam-Webster did up until this year. That said, I would not be surprised if modifies are prepare there as well, eventually, if the misrepresentation of COVID-1 9 mRNA inoculations is allowed to stand.

mRNA Therapy Doesn't Satisfy Public Health Measure Directive

There's also the issue of whether a gene regiman is likely to be mandated, and you are able to hinge on it being accepted as a inoculation. The 1905 Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts8 essentially fixed that collective benefit supersedes individual benefit.

Since mRNA rehabilitations do not interpret the immunized party immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective help that annuls individual jeopardy, and therefore cannot be mandated.

Put another way, the decision quarrels( although legal expert diverge on some of the finer detailed description of its interpretation) that it's acceptable for some individuals to be harmed by a public health directive as long as it benefits the collective. Nonetheless, if vaccination is a public health measure meant to protect and benefit the collective, then it would need to accomplish two things 😛 TAGEND

Ensure that the vaccinated person is rendered immune from the disease.

Inhibit transmission of the disease from the vaccinated person to other characters.

We're now back to the original question that mRNA regimen for COVID-1 9 do not accomplish either of these things. Since these gene therapies do not render the person immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective advantage that usurps individual threat.

On the contrary, the only one benefiting from an mRNA "vaccine" is the individual receiving the gene therapy, since all they are designed to do is minimize clinical indications are connected with the S-1 spike protein.

In other utterances, they won't retain you from going sick with SARS-CoV-2; they just expected to minimize your illnes symptoms if or when you do get infected. So, coming inoculated protects no one but yourself. Since you're the only one who will collect a benefit( less severe COVID-1 9 evidences upon illnes ), the justification to accept the risks of the care "for the greater good" of your community is blatantly irrational.

Sell mRNA Therapy as Vaccine Violates Federal Law

Since mRNA "vaccines" do not match the medical and/ or law description of a vaccine, directing to them as inoculations, and commerce them as such, is a deceitful practice that violates9 15 U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 10 the existing legislation that decides advertising of medical practises.

The lack of accomplished human tribulations too keeps these mRNA produces at odds with 15 U.S. Code Section 41. Per this law, 11,12 it is unlawful to advertise "that a product or service can thwart, consider, or medication human malady unless you own skillful and reliable technical manifestation, including, where needed, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the amount claimed are true at the time they are made."

Here's the problem: The primary end point in the COVID-1 9 "vaccine" troubles does not constitute an actual inoculation inquiry end point because, again, vaccine visitation end point have to do with immunity and dissemination reduction. Neither of those was measured.

What's more, key secondary end points in Moderna's trial include prevention of severe COVID-1 9 canker( defined as need for hospitalization) and prevention of illnes by SARS-CoV-2, irrespective of symptoms. 13,14 However, Moderna did not actually measurement charge of infection, stating that it was too "impractical" to do so.

That conveys there's no evidence of this gene therapy having an impact on infection, for better or worse. And, if you have no evidence, you cannot fulfill the U.S. Code requirement that states you must have "competent and reliable scientific attest ... substantiating that the amount claimed are true."

Making materials worse, both Pfizer and Moderna are now eliminating their control radicals by offering the real vaccine to any and all placebo recipients who are interested it. 15 The studies are supposed to go on for a full two years, but by eliminating the domination group, judging the efficiency and jeopardies is going to be near absurd.

What Makes COVID Vaccines Gene Therapy?

Alright. Let's move on to the definition of "gene therapy." As detailed on MedlinePlus.gov's "What Is Gene Therapy" page: 16

"Gene care is an experimental procedure that uses genes to treat or thwart ailment ... Researchers are researching several comings to gene care, including: ... Introducing a brand-new gene into the body to help fight a disease ...

Although gene regiman is a promising treatment alternative for a number of ailments( including inherited disorders, some types of cancer, and sure-fire viral infections ), the technique remains risky and is still under study to make sure that it will be safe and efficient. Gene therapy is currently being tested simply for diseases that have no other cures."

Here, it's importance noting that there are many different treatments that have been shown to be very effective against COVID-1 9, it is therefore certainly does not qualify as an illness that has no cure. It realise sense that gene therapy should be restricted to fatal cancers, as this is the only time that making drastic perils might be warranted. That said, here's how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines gene therapy: 17

"Human gene therapy strives to modify or operate the showing of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cadres for therapeutic abuse. Gene therapy is a technique that revises a person's genes to treat or medication cancer. Gene cares can manipulate by various mechanisms 😛 TAGEND

* Superseding a disease-causing gene with a healthy imitation of the gene

* Inactivating a disease-causing gene that is not functioning properly

* Pioneering a new or modified gene into the body to help treat a disease"

November 17, 2020, the American Society of Gene+ Cell Therapy( ASGCT) announced "COVID-1 9 Vaccine Candidates Show Gene Therapy Is a Viable Strategy, " noting that: 18

"Two COVID-1 9 vaccine experiments, both of which use messenger RNA( or mRNA) engineering to teach the body to fight the virus, have reported efficacy over 90 percent.

These results, announced by Moderna on Nov. 16 and by Pfizer and its partner BioNTech on Nov. 9 ... demonstrate that gene care is a viable strategy for developing vaccines to combat COVID-1 9.

Both vaccine candidates use mRNA to platform a person's cadres to make countless two copies of a fragment of the virus. The fragment then provokes the immune organization to attack if the real virus tries to invade the body."

mRNA Deliver New Genetic Instructions

As explained in the ASGCT's video above, mRNA are molecules that contain genetic teaches for establishing numerous proteins. mRNA "vaccines" deliver a synthetic form of mRNA into your cadres that carry the instruction to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the antigen, that then activates your immune structure to produce antibodies. Then there's Moderna's tribulation website, 19 where they describe their technology thus 😛 TAGEND

"Typical inoculations for viruses are made from a diminished or inactive virus, but mRN-A1 273 is not made from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It is made from messenger ribonucleic battery-acid( mRNA ), a genetic code that tells cells how to clear protein, which assistant the body's immune system make antibodies to fight the virus."

November 18, 2020, Wired magazine made a big deal about COVID-1 9 vaccines being "genetic vaccines, " mention: 20

"The active ingredient inside their shot is mRNA -- portable cords of genetic code that contain the ideas for proteins. Cells use mRNA to get those specs out of hard-bitten DNA storage and into their protein-making mills. The mRNA inside Pfizer and BioNTech's vaccine targets any cadres it contacts to run a coronavirus spike-building program."

Importantly, as reported by David Martin, Ph.D ., 21,22 "Moderna ... describes its concoction not as a inoculation, but as 'gene care technology' in SEC filings. This is because neither Moderna nor Pfizer ... stimulate any affirms about their commodities procreating exemption or frustrating transmission." Additionally, Moderna's SEC filings solely state that "Currently, mRNA is considered a gene rehabilitation make by the FDA, " as well. 23

mRNA Is 'Proven Form of Gene Therapy'

In a February 2021 essay, MIT Technology Review reviewed the history of mRNA technology in general, and Moderna's in particular, stating: 24

"Vaccines were not their focus. At the company's founding in 2010, its leaders imagined they might be able to use RNA to replace the introduced proteins that even up most of the biotech pharmacopoeia, virtually inducing dopes inside the patient's own cadres from an RNA blueprint. 'We were requesting, could we turn a human into a bioreactor? ' says Noubar Afeyan, the company's cofounder ... "

Bloomberg, in August 2020, reported2 5 that the Moderna vaccine would seek to transform your organization into "a vaccine-making machine." The New York Times was more to the level. In May 2020, they reported2 6 that "Researchers at two Harvard-affiliated hospitals are adapting a confirm use of gene therapy to develop a coronavirus vaccine." Read it again -- A established pattern of gene therapy.

So, to summarize: The definition of "genetic" is something relating to genes, and the definition of "therapy" is the medical treatment of a disease. The interpretation of "gene therapy" is the process of modifying or influencing the formulation of a gene, or adapting the biological dimensions of living cells.

mRNA are snippets of genetic code that advises cells to produce proteins. mRNA COVID-1 9 cares "deliver genetic instructions into your cadres, " thereby triggering your body to produce a fragment of the virus( the spike protein ). So, mRNA inoculations ARE gene care. There's simply no way around this. They fulfill all the definitions of gene therapy and nothing of the interpretations for a inoculation.

Defining 'COVID-1 9'

There's yet one more potential problem with the "COVID-1 9 vaccine" narrative as a whole, which Martin unpacked in a January 25, 2021, interview on the Wise Traditions podcast( above ). 27 In it, he clarifies 😛 TAGEND

"COVID-1 9 is not a disease. It consists of a series of clinical symptoms. It is a beings umbrella of things associated with what used to be associated with influenza and with other febrile diseases.

The problem that we have is that in February[ 2020 ], the World Health Organization was clear in stating that there should not be a conflation between[ SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-1 9 ]. One is a virus, in their definition, and one is a set of clinical symptoms. The impression in February was that SARS-CoV-2 caused COVID-1 9.

The problem with that explanation, and with the expectation, is that the majority of people who test positive exploiting the RT-PCR procedure for testing, for fragments of what is associated with SARS-CoV-2, are not ill at all. The illusion that the virus movements a disease came apart. That's the reason why they developed the term asymptomatic carrier."

In short-lived, SARS-CoV-2 has yet to be definitively proven to be the actual crusade of COVID-1 9. So, a gene regiman that teaches your form to produce a SARS-CoV-2 antigen -- the viral spike protein -- cannot even be touted as a preventative against COVID-1 9, as the two have not been shown to be causally associated.

"They have been willfully lying since the inception of this, " Martin says in the interrogation. "There is not a causal link between these things ... It has never even been close to established.

We have a situation where the impression of the problem is that people say, 'I don't want to get COVID-1 9. ' What they necessitate is they don't miss to get infected with a virus. The problem is those two things are not relevant to each other. A viral illnes hasn't been documented in the majority of "whats called" cases.

There is no basis for that conflation other than the manipulation of the public. That's the first half of the problem. The second half of the problem is that what is being touted as a vaccination ... is not a vaccine. This is gene therapy ...

What is this doing? It's sending a filament of synthetic RNA into the human being and is invoking within the human being, the creation of the S1 spike protein, which is a pathogen ... A vaccine is supposed to trigger immunity. It's not supposed to provoke you to make a toxin ...

It's not somewhat different. It's not the same at all ... It's not a vetoing infection. It's not a proscribing transmitting invention. It's a represents by which your torso is conscripted to realize the toxin that then, allegedly, your body somehow get worked to the handling of, but unlike a vaccine -- which is to trigger the immune response -- this is to trigger the creation of the toxin."

Why the Misrepresentation?

As of the reasons why narcotic fellowships are misrepresenting information and communication technologies, Martin supposes "it's done alone so that they can get themselves under the umbrella of public health laws that exploit vaccination."

Experimental gene therapies do not have monetary obligation shielding from the authority, but pandemic inoculations do, even in the experimental place, as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect. This is indeed a major incentive to make sure this technology is perceived as a inoculation and nothing else.

So, by maintaining the illusion that COVID-1 9 is a state of emergency, when in reality it is not, government leaders are providing cover for these gene regiman business so that they are insulated from any responsibility.

Experimental Gene Therapy Is a Bad Idea

I've written many sections detailing the possible and expected side effects of these gene care "vaccines." If all of this is new to you, consider re-examine "How COVID-1 9 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System, " "Seniors Dying After COVID Vaccine Labeled as Natural Causes" and "Side Effects and Data Gaps Raise Questions on COVID Vaccine."

The take-home message here is that these infusions are not inoculations. They is not avoid illnes, they do not render you immune and they do not prevent communication of the disease. Instead, they modify your genetic coding, turning you into a viral protein factory that has no off-switch. What's happening here is a medical hoax of unprecedented importance, and it really needs to be stopped before it's too late for a majority of people.

If you already got the vaccine and now regret it, you may be able to address your symptoms squandering the same programmes you'd use to treat actual SARS-CoV-2 infection. I discussed these strategies at the end of "Why COVID Vaccine Testing Is a Farce."

Last but not least, if you got the vaccine and are having side effects, please help raise public awareness by reporting it. The Children's Health Defense is calling on all who have suffered a side effect from a COVID-1 9 inoculation to do these three things: 28

If you live in the U.S ., file a report on VAERS

Report the harm on VaxxTracker.com, which is a nongovernmental adverse event tracker( you can file anonymously if you like)

Report the gash on the CHD website

Read more: articles.mercola.com


Vaccination and Censorship: The Truth Will Set Us Free

On December 22, 2020, a nonprofit limited company based in Great Britain that calls itself the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH)1,2,3 published a report titled "The Anti-Vaxx Playbook."4

It contains false and misleading information about the Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination, which was sponsored by the 39-year-old U.S. nonprofit educational charity the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), and held online in October 2020. Promotion of the CCDH report resulted in the spreading of fake news and misinformation by mainline media outlets in Great Britain and the U.S.5,6,7,8,9

NVIC's pay-for-view digital conference10 was transparently open to the public and featured presentations by 51 speakers from the U.S. and other countries discussing vaccine science, public health policy and law, informed consent and civil liberties.

Dedicated to "Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century," the conference was made available on February 2, 2021 for free viewing online. Go to NVIC.org11 to access the conference website and watch all of the presentations.

CCDH Misinformation Campaign Designed to Discredit, Destroy NVIC

Influence Watch, which monitors individuals and groups that influence12 public policy, describes CCDH as a "London-based advocacy group that targets accused 'hate groups' and individuals for de-platforming campaigns to remove them from major social media outlets" and "has ties to the left-wing British Labour Party and British left-progressivism."13

The anonymously funded CCDH also has an office in Washington, D.C. and the defamatory publicity campaign created in December 2020 was designed to not only discredit NVIC's four-decade public record of working within the U.S. democratic system to secure vaccine safety and informed consent protections in public health policies and laws, but to destroy our small charity.

The misinformation campaign was spearheaded by the CEO of CCDH, who is a political operative14 personally affiliated with Great Britain's socialist Labour Party.15,16,17

The report deceived readers by describing NVIC's 2020 conference as a meeting "recently held in private over three days," which implied secrecy,18 even though the event was transparently open to the public just like the four previous vaccination conferences NVIC hosted in 1997, 2000, 2002 and 2009.19

One British tabloid read the report and described NVIC's public conference as a "private conference call" where "secret plans" were plotted to "launch the largest ever misinformation campaign about vaccines."20

Last summer, CCDH published their first report alleging that Big Tech companies operating social media platforms make big profits by allowing individuals and organizations criticizing vaccine science, policy and law to message on their platforms,21 and should take stronger action to censor online public conversations about vaccination that do not conform with the "scientific consensus that vaccines are safe."22,23

That July 2020 report was promoted by mainline media outlets in Britain24,25,26,27 and the U.S.28 However, CCDH's report published five months later in December 2020, which created fake news and misinformation about NVIC's conference, contained even more inflammatory rhetoric.

It demonized those who criticize vaccine safety as "malignant actors,"29 and CCDH demanded that companies and governments virtually eliminate individuals or groups publishing information online that fails to align with government and industry narratives about vaccination and public health policy.

In that report, CCDH ordered Big Tech companies and governments to censor and punish dissenters, charging that "anything less than the dismantling of these individuals' profiles, pages and groups and permanent denial of service, now they know what is happening, is willing acquiescence."30

On January 18, 2021, the anonymously funded CCDH once again publicly attacked the National Vaccine Information Center, this time for applying for a U.S. Paycheck Protection Program loan to secure the continued employment of NVIC's 21 workers during massive nationwide unemployment caused by lockdowns.

The British nonprofit company appeared to suggest that the U.S. government should not have been viewpoint-neutral in granting relief loans, but should have applied an ideological litmus test to NVIC's loan request that was made to retain employees during catastrophic economic hardship caused by lockdowns that have affected donations to charities.31

CCDH CEO Imran Ahmed said, "Lending money to these organizations so they can prosper is a sickening use of taxpayer money."32 Once again, mainline media outlets in Britain and the U.S. widely promoted CCDH's allegations.33,34,35,36,37

Six months of orchestrated public attacks on NVIC by CCDH have generated hate mail to our small charity, which was founded and has been led by parents of vaccine-injured children for four decades.38

Strong Freedom of Dissent History in US

I was born into a post-World War II generation in the U.S., a generation known for challenging the status quo and exercising the right to dissent, which is protected under the U.S. Constitution.39

Whether it was advocating for the right to listen to rock 'n' roll and joining antinuclear protests in the 1950s,40,41 or marching in support of civil rights and opposing an undeclared war in Asia in the 1960s,42,43 or women fighting for equal opportunity and pay and consumer activists working for environmental protection and car safety laws in the 1970s,44,45,46,47 or mothers protesting against drunk drivers48 and choosing a drug-free birth and breastfeeding for their babies in the 1980s,49,50 the baby boomer generation has been known for exercising freedom of thought and speech. 

Contentious social, political and health issues of the 20th century sparked heated debates on college campuses,51 where students could still explore, critique and openly search for truth, and in mainline newspapers, magazines and radio and television stations, where point/counterpoint examination of controversial topics was the hallmark of good journalism because public debate is the hallmark of free speech.

The America where I grew up in the mid-20th century was a beacon of hope for people living behind the Iron Curtain52 and in other totalitarian or authoritarian societies,53 where exercise of freedom of thought, speech and conscience and the right to dissent and peacefully assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances had been eliminated, where people had been turned into silent indentured servants working to serve a small ruling class in control of the state.54

Statists, who believe that economic control and planning must be in the hands of a highly centralized government,55 are always afraid of the truth, afraid that people armed with knowledge will act together to challenge control of the state by a powerful and privileged few.

Without Debate, Without Criticism 'No Republic Can Survive'

I was in junior high school when President John F. Kennedy addressed the American Newspaper Publishers Association in 1961. He said:56

"Without debate, without criticism no administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.

And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment — the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution — not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply 'give the public what it wants' — but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion."

He closed with these words:

"So it is to the printing press — to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news — that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help, man will be what he was born to be: free and independent."

That speech given 60 years ago was a ringing endorsement for freedom of the press. Yet, in the 21st century, it is becoming clear that there are political operatives and corporations seeking to censor freedom of thought and speech by citizen journalists publishing analysis and perspective on the worldwide web, an electronic communications network that has been the world's biggest forum for free speech over the past quarter century.57,58

Right to Dissent, Freedom of Speech Under Assault in America

The right to dissent59 and exercise freedom of thought, speech and conscience60 is under assault in America,61 even though these cherished civil liberties are codified into the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution. And civil liberties are under assault internationally in other nations with representative democracies, as well.62

Today, political operatives are pressuring government, media corporations and other institutions to eliminate freedom of speech, especially public conversations about vaccine science, policy and law.63,64,65

Spirited public debate about vaccine safety and mandatory vaccination laws has been going on for more than two centuries.66,67 What is the justification for censoring that public conversation now and punishing those who engage in it with economic and social sanctions?68,69

And if the public conversation about vaccination and health can be censored, what topic will be the next one put on the "no fly" list?70,71

NVIC: Working to Reform Vaccine Policy and Law for Decades

I am a co-founder and president of the highly rated nonprofit educational charity established in 1982 and known today as the National Vaccine Information Center.72,73 Our mission is to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education. NVIC does not make vaccine use recommendations. We advocate for the human and legal right to make informed and voluntary decisions about vaccination without being coerced or punished for the decision made.74

Our not-for-profit charitable organization was established for one reason: We were mothers and fathers of children brain injured by the highly reactive pertussis vaccine in the DPT shot and we wanted a safer pertussis vaccine to replace the one that had hurt our children. That goal was accomplished after 14 years of consumer advocacy when a less reactive acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine was licensed for babies in the U.S. in 1996.75

We also wanted parents to have access to accurate and full information about the risks and complications of both diseases and vaccines before children are vaccinated, so parents and pediatricians could work together to identify those children who are more susceptible to vaccine reactions and protect their health.

That is why we worked with Congress to secure vaccine safety informing, recording, reporting and research provisions in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, a law in which the U.S. government officially acknowledged for the first time that vaccine safety should be made a national priority because federally licensed and recommended and state mandated childhood vaccines can and do cause permanent injuries and even death for some children.76,77,78

We are not all the same. We do not all react the same way to pharmaceutical products,79,80,81 which is why our organization has strongly supported research into genetic, epigenetic, environmental and other risk factors that make some individuals more susceptible to adverse responses to vaccination.82,83

We believe every life is important, and that the lives of those harmed by vaccines and infectious diseases should be equally valued and protected.

We believe that consumer advocacy has and should continue to play an active role in holding pharmaceutical companies and government agencies accountable for vaccine product safety, and we are dedicated to working responsibly within the democratic system of this Constitutional Republic to make health policy and law safer and more effective for everyone.84,85,86

Since 1988, I and other NVIC representatives have served as consumer members of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee, FDA Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines, Vaccine Policy Analysis Collaborative and other federal and state public engagement projects discussing vaccine science, policy and law issues with vaccine developers, federal and state health officials, medical trade and pharmaceutical industry representatives, and members of other nonprofit organizations.87,88,89

My 22 years of service as a consumer member on federal advisory committees and public engagement projects includes four years as a member of the Institute of Medicine Vaccine Safety Forum at the National Academy of Science, where I helped to coordinate public workshops on vaccine science, policy and law issues90 and was an editor for the report on Risk Communication and Vaccination published by the National Academy Press. That report importantly stated:91

"The goal that all parties share regarding vaccine risk communication should be informed decision making. Consent for vaccination is truly 'informed' when the members of the public know the risks and benefits and make voluntary decisions.

The discussion of mandatory vaccination at the workshop suggested that it may interfere with informed consent and may damage trust and deter effective communication, and thus needs to be carefully weighed against its benefits."

We believe the human right to freedom of thought, speech and conscience should be respected, not devalued. As public health regulations and laws are being created during the coronavirus pandemic to restrict or eliminate civil liberties,92 we should be encouraging people to have civil conversations about vaccination, health and autonomy. Americans should be welcomed by legislators to participate in — not be shut out of — the democratic law making process.93

When people feel disenfranchised and believe that those in power do not care about their lives or the lives of their children, that is when trust in government is lost and people let fear, anger and despair control their actions. Empowering people with knowledge and the hope they can help effect meaningful change if they do it in a rational and constructive way has always been one of NVIC's guiding principles.94

Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination Features Principled, Courageous Speakers

I want to thank the generous sponsors and attendees of the Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination: Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century, who helped to make it financially possible for NVIC to host a virtual conference last fall.95

The conference had been scheduled for two years to be held in October 2020 in a hotel in the Washington, D.C. area. When travel and social distancing restrictions were enacted in the spring of 2020, we had to make a choice between canceling the conference or pivoting to a pay-for-view online public conference.

We chose to hold the conference online because we knew that the controversial issues being debated in the public square this year needed a public forum where well-anchored information and perspective could be presented.

We owe a debt of gratitude to the more than two dozen principled and courageous scientists, physicians, holistic health professionals, authors, attorneys, faith leaders, parents of vaccine injured children and civil and human rights activists, who represent diverse areas of expertise and participated in our conference.96

NVIC Will Not Abandon Our Mission

No matter how many political operatives, corporations and institutions threaten and try to discredit NVIC and our work in order to silence us, we will not abandon our 40-year mission dedicated to preventing vaccine injuries and deaths through public education and defending the ethical principle of informed consent. We are moving forward with faith and resolve that we can secure a future for America that protects health and autonomy in the 21st century.

Because we know that if the state can tag, track down and force individuals against their will to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity today, then there will be no limit on which individuals' freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.

Be the one who never has to say you did not do today what you could have done to change tomorrow. It's your health. Your family. Your choice. And our mission continues. No forced vaccination. Not in America.

Read more: articles.mercola.com