Dalelorenzo's GDI Blog
18Apr/210

The Ugly Truth About COVID

Nick Hudson, an actuary and private equity investor, co-founded Pandemics~ Data& Analytics( PANDA) in response to the many threats to civil rights and freedoms that have occurred during the COVID-1 9 pandemic response. While media and public health universities have engaged in a campaign of smoke and mirrors -- one that is perpetuating paralyzing suspicion, needlessly, to this day -- data and points don’t lie.

Hudson and his unit at PANDA, which include a data analyst, economist, medical doctors, large-hearted data analyst and public health professionals, are using live data1 and open science to sanction the public to rehearsal freedom of choice and perpetuate free civilizations. 2

Hudson spoke at the inaugural BizNews Investment Conference in March 2021, and his keynote address is above. He interprets the ugly truth about COVID-1 9, which is that the world is being crippled by fear due to a fallaciou narrative. Anyone who challenges that narrative is being labeled as a lunatic, a danger or a danger to society, which is furthering the repression and unjustified fear.

Bringing COVID-1 9 Truth to Light

George Washington famously said, “Truth will ultimately prevail where there are plans carried out in order to bring it to light.”3 With that in sentiment, Hudson envisioned the “seeds of a great tragedy” being embed with the fictitiou COVID-1 9 narrative, and has established it a mission to get the truth out. So, what is the reality about the pandemic? According to Hudson: 4

A virus that presents increased risk to few and inconsequential jeopardy to most hit some regions

Few are susceptible to severe disease

There are several accessible treatments

Asymptomatic people are not major moves of disease

Lockdowns and disguise commissions haven’t acted and instead justification immense harm

The prone were hurt instead of helped

The misinformation has been spewed from the start, including by World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. In a March 3, 2020, media briefing, he stated, “Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-1 9 cases going to die. By comparison, seasonal influenza generally kills far less than 1% of those infected.”5

But according to Hudson, the 3.4% represents contingency fatality rate( CFR ), which is the number of deaths from COVID-1 9 divided by the number of cases of COVID-1 9, while the 1% is illnes fatality rate( IFR ), or the number of deaths divided by all infected individuals.

“By conflating these two separate pitches( CFR and IFR ), ” Hudson said, “Tedros was effectively lying.” Quantitative scientist John Ioannidis, prof of medication at the Stanford Prevention Research Center, calculated the IFR for COVID-1 9 in its examination of 61 seroprevalence studies, which was a median of 0.23%, and 0.05% in people younger than 70.6

Based on this, the IFR for COVID-1 9 be less than that of the flu. And wouldn’t you know it, in a New England Journal of Medicine editorial published March 26, 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci, lead of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases( NIAID ), and collaborators expressed the view that “the overall clinical consequences of Covid-1 9 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.”7

The media have repressed this reality, Hudson mentioned, along with the fact that there’s a 1,000 times gap in fatality among those younger than 19 and those older than 70 -- something that should have been taken into account in the pandemic response.

Is COVID-1 9 Really a' Novel Virus’?

Further inflaming widespread horror is the idea that COVID-1 9 is a “novel virus, ” which realizes it sound like it’s something humans "ve never" encountered before. But is it certainly? According to Hudson 😛 TAGEND

“The reality is that the coronavirus is a very close relative , not even a separate subspecies, a very close relative of the 2003 SARS virus. There are seven related coronaviruses known to cause disease in humen, probably many others, and four members of them is generally circulation.

Annual, world circulation. So the refer of this malady is terribly inconsistent. Now a rose by any identify, SARS. A variance of SARS. It’s not novel.”

One study even found that 81% of parties not exposed to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that motives COVID-1 9, were still able to mount an immune response against it, which “suggests at least some built-in immune protection from SARS-CoV-2 ... ”8

Nonetheless, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO’s technological lead-in for the COVID-1 9 pandemic, stated that “a majority of the world’s population is prone to infection from this virus.”9 This is the firstly of two key elements that, Hudson said, lead to “homosapienophobia” -- the idea that everyone is dangerous until proven healthy.

The idea of universal susceptibility to COVID-1 9 is nonsense, Hudson observed, as was demonstrated early on with the Diamond Princess cruise ship. Among the 3,711 passengers and crew onboard the Diamond Princess, 712( 19.2%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and of these 46.5% were asymptomatic at the time of testing. Of those showing evidences, simply 9.7% required intensive care and 1.3%( nine) died. 10

PANDA data also goes to show that, starting in February 2021, there was not universal susceptibility to the virus. Their data evidenced cumulative COVID-1 9 deaths per million people. In Africa, Southeast Asia and Oceania, the population fatality rate was 112 per million compared against 710 per million in Europe and the Americas.

As for Africa, Southeast Asia and Oceania, Hudson said, “the population fatality rate there virtually isn’t an epidemic. In a typical time, they’d have 10,000 deaths per million from all causes.”

Suspicion Mongering Over Asymptomatic Spread

The second element that enables the doctrine of “everyone being a danger” to continue is the idea of asymptomatic spread driving sicknes. “I was absolutely aghast to find out the poor quality of the science” behind it, Hudson said.

One of the seminal papers involved one woman who were allegedly infected 16 collaborators while she was asymptomatic. 11 The study was widely used to suggest that asymptomatic spread was following, but controversy later ensued over whether the woman was actually asymptomatic when the others were infected or if she was symptomatic and is dealt with for flu-like evidences at the time. 12

In June 2020, Kerkhove also made it very clear that people who have COVID-1 9 without any indications “rarely” move the disease to others. But in a startling about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement simply the working day later. June 9, 2020, Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of WHO’s emergencies platform, rapidly backpedaled Van Kerkhove’s statement, saying the statements were “misinterpreted or perhaps we didn’t use the most elegant names to explain that.”1 3

“It’s utter, emit stupidity, ” Hudson said, adding that Fauci also stated in January 2020, “asymptomatic transmission has never been the operator of eruptions. The move of eruptions is always a symptomatic person.”1 4

A JAMA Network Open study last-minute obtain, in December 2020, that asymptomatic transmission is not a primary operator of infection within households. 15 A study in Nature Communications likewise met "there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive someone to marked close contacts."1 6

Lockdown Madness

The myth of widespread asymptomatic spread is what was used to justify worldwide lockdowns of healthy parties. “Bruce Aylward will go down in biography as a criminal of stupendou prominence, ” Hudson said, referring to Aylward’s role as the head of a WHO team that toured Wuhan, China, and concluded lockdowns were working to stop COVID-1 9 spread. 17

“He takes a delegation to China, depletes a few days, then comes back and says everyone should follow China’s response, the doctrine of universal susceptibility, ” Hudson said. Yet, prior to the COVID-1 9 pandemic official guidelines for pandemic response designs recommend against large-scale quarantine of the healthy.

In fact, WHO wrote that during an flu pandemic, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry and exit screening and border ending are “not recommended in any circumstance.”1 8P TAGEND

Likewise, in 2021 a study published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation determined no significant benefits on COVID-1 9 instance rise in regions employing more restrictive nonpharmaceutical involvements( NPIs) such as mandatory stay-at-home and business close fiats( i.e ., lockdowns ). 19

Data compiled by PANDA too perceived no link between lockdowns and COVID-1 9 deaths per million people. The illnes followed a path of linear nosedive regardless of whether or not lockdowns were imposed.

What isn’t a lie, however, is that lockdowns cause a great deal of evil. Child mortality, privation, starvation and joblessness is on the increase, as are slows in medical treatment and diagnosis, psychological disorders among youth, suicide and deaths of despair.

Education has been interrupted for an estimated 1.6 billion children, Hudson said, and a questionnaire of 2,000 U.S. adults is demonstrated that 1 in 6 Americans started rehabilitation for the first time during 2020. Almost half( 45%) of the survey respondents reconfirmed that the COVID-1 9 pandemic was the driving reason that triggered them to seek a therapist’s help. 20 According to Hudson 😛 TAGEND

“Perhaps the hardest thing for me to swallow about all of this is in undergraduate epidemiology, it is a well-known finding that when you are confronted with a disease with sharp-worded perimeter graduation, as you are with coronavirus , appropriate measures to generally hushes the spread of the disease have the effect, reliably, of switch the disease onu onto the vulnerable, who we should be protecting. They degenerate coronavirus mortality.”

Mask Rhetoric Is Misleading

It’s been touted that face concealments are essential to stopping the spread of COVID-1 9 and trying to save 130,000 lives in the U.S. alone. 21 But in 2019, the The world health organisation analyzed 10 randomized self-restrained trials and concluded, “there was no evidence that facemasks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”2 2

Only one randomized self-restrained trial has been conducted on mask usage and COVID-1 9 transfer, and it located disguises did not statistically significantly reduce the incidence of infection. 23

You may remember that in the early days of the pandemic, face masks were not recommended for the general public. In February 2020, Christine Francis, the expert consultants for illnes avoidance and control at WHO headquarters, was incorporated in a video, holding up a expendable face mask.

She said, “Medical disguises like this one cannot protect against the brand-new coronavirus when abused alone ... WHO only recommends the use of masks in specific cases.”2 4 As of March 31, 2020, WHO was still advising against the use of face masks for parties without manifestations, stating that there is “no evidence” that such concealment utilization prevents COVID-1 9 transmitting. 25

But by June 2020, the rhetoric change over time. Citing “evolving evidence, ” WHO overturned their recommendation and began advising governments to encourage the general public to wear masks where there is widespread transmission and physical distancing is difficult. 26 Yet that very same day, June 5, 2020, WHO published an announcement stating: 27

“At present, "were not receiving" direct suggestion( from studies on COVID-1 9 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy beings in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-1 9. ”

The U.S. Hubs for Disease Control and Prevention did a same about-face on cover-up application, citing research studies of two hair dressers in Missouri, who had allegedly been symptomatic with COVID-1 9 and styled 139 clients’ hair.

None of the clients tested positive for COVID-1 9, which the CDC suggested was because they and the stylists wore cover-ups. 28 Hudson concludes, nonetheless, that the customers were probably young and not suggestible to the virus in the first place.

Another study published in the CDC’s journal Emerging Infectious Diseases territory, “We did not find evidence that surgical-type face disguises are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when threadbare by infected persons( informant hold) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility.”2 9

PANDA data also pictured no differences in transmission in moods with concealment commissions and those without. Still, state officials are now advising you should double or triple up on disguises to compile them work better.

Vaccine Being Sold as a Ticket to Freedom

People who stand to move countless billions out of COVID-1 9 inoculations are now selling them as air tickets to freedom, Hudson moods 😛 TAGEND

“How convenient that we now have a logic that tells us that we need to inoculate 7.8 billion people for an illness that has a convey survival rates of 99.95% for parties under the age of 70. The profiteering here is naked. It is transparent.”

It’s a sad situation when adolescents, who aren’t at high risk, are lining up for vaccines really to get their freedoms back, he contributes. When you supplement in all the other divergences and lies -- PCR assessments that are not capable of diagnosing infectiousness, overstated extinction numbers, restrictions on travel, media hype and arbitrary conventions, like the CDC’s recent change in physical distancing in classrooms from 6 hoofs to 3 feet3 0 -- it’s as though we’re living in an Orwellian reality.

With looming vaccine passports, the loss of personal immunities is at an unprecedented level, while beings are generally “enslaved by fear” -- dread of infection or reinfection, “long COVID, ” resurgence and mutant variants. “The underpinnings of our civilization are under threat, ” Hudson memo, and we have a choice. “We’ve been pushed up against a cliff, will we be pushed off or will we push back? ”

He urges beings to support the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for “focused protection” and locating a middle ground between fastening down an entire economy and simply “letting it rip.” As of April 4, 2021, the declaration has mustered 41,890 signatures from medical practitioner and over 13,796 signatures from medical and public health scientists. 31

In addition, the declaration is open for public signatures and has compiled 764,089 from concerned citizens various regions of the world. The website allows you to read and sign the declaration, refutes many frequently asked questions, shares the social sciences behind the proposals and explains how the declaration was written.

PANDA also published a etiquette for reopening civilization “to provide a road map out of the devastate hertz of lockdowns.”3 2 Hudson repeated Nelson Mandela, who territory firmnes is not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. We all need to strive for courage and foundation awareness campaigns aimed at stopping the pernicious narrative, counteracting dread and protecting future freedom.

Read more: articles.mercola.com

Comments (0) Trackbacks (0)

No comments yet.


Leave a comment

No trackbacks yet.